Category: Vampires

  • HORRROR OF DRACULA

         Horror of Dracula was an eye-opener when it was first released (in 1957).  In his great book of short reviewsThe Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film, Michael Weldon calls it “The best vampire film ever made.”  I think he’s absolutely right.

         Its studio, Hammer, had a small budget to work with.   Much less freedom to use special effects likethose, for example in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, years later.  Hammer had to leave out several parts of the novel requiring special effects.

       Still the stripped-down plot taken from Bram Stoker’s great 1897 novel is focused and absorbing; scenes and images will stay with you.  Screenwriter Jimmy Sangster and director Terence Fisher got what they wanted.

      They believed that, to tell the story right, their movie needed two elements.   First, to spill blood like never before.   Second, the freedom to show women lusting for Count Dracula.  It meant pushing the censors (even stricter in the United Kingdom than in the USA) to new limits.  Remember, 1957 was still the era of Doris Day/Rock Hudson comedies.

       Horror of Dracula did not share much with the 1931 Universal Studios Dracula.But surprisingly, this was a good thing.   Most of that movie had been based on a Broadway play; the longer it goes on, the more stage-y it feels. The new Count Dracula, Christopher Lee,had never seen the Universal movie.   Instead, he reread the novel–many times, for his inspiration.

    image

    Christopher Lee–Dracula

       The opening scenes succeed in translating much of the
    book’s atmosphere.  The count is polite and speaks good
    English.   You don’t immediately feel anything sinister about him.  But all this is just a mask; you learn real fast that things are wrong here.

       Jonathan Harker has come to Castle Dracula in the disguise of librarian, his real mission to destroy Dracula. The count gives Harker a brief, but warm welcome.  He says little except for his compliments while he looks at photos of Harker’s beautiful fiancée Lucy.

       But you learn how false this mask is.  That night Harker walks downstairs and meets a woman begging him forhelp.  She tells him that Dracula is keeping her prisoner.

       Harker is unsure whether to believe her.  But when he later wanders downstairs, he accepts her word for everything.  Again the same embrace but this time with a savage difference; she turns her mouth to his neck and bares her teeth to bite him.

       What follows is probably the most intense scene in director Fisher’s career.  You see Dracula at the top of the staircase, face in close-up, eyes bright red.  In an instant he is down the stairs, throwing the woman to the floor.  She hisses back at him in pure fury.

    .image

    The savagery behind the polite shell

    .

    The two of them literally snarl at one another, hungry cats fighting over a scrap of food.

        Or maybe; two junkies fighting over just enough dope to get one of them off.  You feel a sense of viciousness, rarely experienced onscreen 70 years ago.  It shows another side of Dracula, one that stays with you.  A truth about him that makes Lucy and Mina’s craving for him more unsettling.    You have already seen his animal side.

    image

    Harker abruptly realizes what he is dealing with 

    Harker is soon dead, a victim of his own bad judgment in trying to
    stake Dracula. But Harker’s work is taken up by a new vampire
    hunter—Dr. Van Helsing.  An insightful, intelligent, imaginative, articulate, courageous man.  Someone who’s able to deal with vampires, but with others too:  Superstitious peasants in Transylvania, terrified of strangers.  Members of the Victorian-era middle class with just enough scientific knowledge to reject anything they believe is superstition. (The movie is set in Germany but its characters seem much more English than German.)

       Worst, a middle class that puts down its women, ignoring both their intellect and their sexuality.  The men, mostly pompous, self-satisfied, know-it-alls.   The women’s lives empty and boring.  It’s no great surprise these women are ready to follow a figure as charismatic as Dracula.

        Van Helsing knows all this and knows he must deal with these things alone.

       As he moves from each closed world to another, Van Helsing must deal with the peasants’ mistrust, and the  Holmwoods’ (Jonathan’s close friends) lack of belief. His job is especially difficult with this family.  Van Helsing needs to respectfully, yet forcefully convince them their rational, scientific outlook is accurate… but limited. Vampires still exist, and modern science is helpless against them.

       Most of all Van Helsing understands vampires; their craving for blood, a craving that inevitably strips away all humanity.  A craving more potent than friendship, love, even the taboos against harming a child.  He knows what Harker did not; how to use the weapons he has.image

    Dr. Van Helsing–great personal courage 

         When the scene shifts from Transylvania to middle-class Germany, Van Helsing has the difficult job of telling Harker’s friends that Jonathan is dead.    With great tact, Van Helsing wins over Mr. Holmwood.

        At this same moment, Van Helsing faces a new crisis.  Lucy, Harker’s fiancée, has been suffering anemia without explanation.  Lucy is a kindhearted but naive woman, over-protected all her life.  Her future already determined: wife and mother in the privileged class.

       Slowly but surely you sense a change in Lucy. As much as any British movie at that time could show, you feel her yearning, then lusting, for an unknown force to possess her. Watch her reaction to the garlic placed at her window for protection (no, it’s not the smell that makes her uneasy.) Watch her lie down in bed and open her nightgown to expose her throat.   Then watch her look of quiet
    expectation as the wind swirls the leaves outside her window.

    image

     Lucy waits for the Count; subtle images yet nearly censored in 1957

        She waits for someone, the opposite of the gracious but utterly bland Jonathan.  Someone with no hesitation about taking what he wants.   The count has left his castle and descended upon a  society with no defense against him.  Gasoline and matches.

       Lucy dies from loss of blood.  She is buried, yet Tania, a servant’s young child, has seen her at night, in the garden.  Van Helsing knows what must be done.

        Already, Lucy has asked Tania to go walking with her.  Without showing any violence, the movie makes it clear; though Lucy has known Tania for years, the girl is nothing to her now.  Only an easy  blood-meal.  You are light-years away here from the little girl in
    Interview with the Vampire.

       Van Helsing, not a pious man, is described by critics as a man with an intimate knowledge of sacred objects as weapons
    in his arsenal.  He uses a cross to stop Lucy in her tracks
    by placing it against her forehead, burning her deeply.  She
    flees back to her crypt.  Tania watches, one small step from
    hysteria.  Her plea, “I want to go home,” only hints at how
    close she is to chaos.

      But Van Helsing stays in control.  “And so you shall,” he tells her, his words symbolizing the calm presence he brings.  Very quietly, very assuredly he asks Tania to wait for him.

       Van Helsing must convince Holmwood that their only way to save Lucy’s soul is to drive a stake through her heart.  (In the novel, they must also cut her head off.)

        Blood gushes, but Van Helsing finishes his work.  Afterwards, his wisdom is clearly shown by the transformed expression on Lucy’s face, the sweetness, the innocence of the old Lucy.

         The violence that Fisher believed he needed to show is essential.  Lucy’s demonic urges must be purged from her to restore her to purity.  To understand, to taste for yourself the transformation from Lucy to vampire, then back to Lucy, you need to see the cancer cut out of her.

         Critics at the time, especially in England, criticized Fisher’s onscreen violence.  He believed that storytellers of magical tales needed to portray the struggle between good and evil graphically.  Suggestion was not enough.  His goal was not the ambiguity Val
    Lewton aimed for, and achieved so well, in Cat People and
    The Seventh Victim.  Instead Fisher strived for something closer to the horror of Germanic folk tales and legends.  The ones before well-meaning people created tamer versions, believing these tales must be made suitable for children.

        Sadly, time and budget limits meant that many of the novel’s characters had to be minimized or left out completely.  Stoker’s theme of a group of brothers and a sister united by common blood against a sinister foe is gone.  Van Helsing must face Dracula alone.

          In every way, he is up to the task. Horror of Dracula becomes a pure action movie after the count begins his flight back to the castle and Transylvania.  And it may be Hammer’s best action movie ever.  A fight to the death between two figures, both larger
    than life.  Peter Cushing, with a style of acting once described as “fussy” proves himself not just scholarly, but tough.

       Hammer’s peak years lasted until about 1962. The studio never could top what they achieved in this movie. Only one vampire movie The Brides of Dracula, even comes close, along with a scattering of others.  Hammer tried to ride the wave of freedom to show more sex, nudity, and violence in the late 60’s but it was too late.  Horror of Dracula remains their best, the real deal, especially when you imagine how it must have felt to people accustomed to Rock Hudson/Doris Day.  Don’t miss this one.

  • THE BRIDES OF DRACULA

          After the great success of. Horror of Dracula, Hammer studios wanted badly to make a sequel.

         However, Christopher Lee, so effective as the count in Horror, refused to star.  Lee was afraid of being typecast forever as Dracula.

       Hammer’s answer was to use a misleading title and then state in a prologue that Dracula is dead, but his many disciples live on.  Brides of Dracula is the story of one disciple, Baron Meinster.   You get a sense throughout this movie that Hammer did not want to change a successful formula.  They used the same director,
    Terence Fisher, writer Jimmy Sangster (along with two other
    screenwriters) and the other star of Horror, Peter Cushing, again playing  Dr. Van Helsing.

       What they got was the same intensity, possibly more.  The music tended to be melodramatic, over-the-top at times.  But it adds to the atmosphere.  And you feel a sizzling tension between the vampire, Baron Meinster, and his mother, who has kept him prisoner for years.

    In Brides, you feel right away that the countryside is a dangerous place, especially after sunset. Everywhere is mist, but it has a foul appearance to it, especially where it hangs over ponds and swamps. (In Horror of Dracula, Jonathan Harker notices the silence surrounding Dracula’s castle:  No birds sang.)

       Even at the inn, the atmosphere is tense.  The student-teacher, Marianne feels like an outsider the minute she enters.

       As thunder crashes, the tension increases with the
    arrival of a strange, severe-looking, aristocratic old woman
    dressed all in red and black.  She speaks one word to the old
    couple, “Wine.”  She is the Baroness Meinster, and immediately invites Marianne to share a drink, then to spend the night in her castle.  The landlord and his wife are clearly shaken and abruptly offer Marianne the chance to stay at the inn.  But Marianne has already accepted the baroness’ hospitality.

       You first see the castle in a low-angle shot, showing
    it perched on a mountainsideInside, it is exquisitely decorated, suggesting a great family. fortune.  Yet somehow Marianne still appears to be in danger.  Greta, the baroness’ one servant, gives off suspicious, controlling vibes; you get the impression that
    she will bully anyone who lets her.  For a moment, Marianne
    steps onto her balcony.  From there she can see a man standing outside in another wing of the castle.

       Instead of denying what Marianne saw, or trying to avoid it, the baroness speaks freely about the man, her son.  “My son is ill,” she says.   When Mariann asks if he is ill in his mind, the baroness does not deny it.  She says that he has caused her endless pain.  Once the castle was a place of grand parties and gatherings, but those days are long-gone, because of her son.  You canl hear a mix of great sadness, regret, and bitterness in her words.  She has not seen him or spoken to him in years, she says; he is fully in Greta’s care.

       Marianne goes to sleep then wakes suddenly, her mind on the man she glimpsed before.  She finds her way to his room.  For a long time he does not step out of the shadows.  He asks Marianne to come closer, explaining that he cannot come to her.  It is then that Marianne sees he is held prisoner by a long silver chain.

       The baron says that his mother has kept him chained
    and told people that he is dead; that she is motivated to
    keep the fortune, land, and castle that would be his inheritance.  As Marianne does, you wonder now if the baroness is the insane one, the monster.  Marianne agrees to find the key to the chain.  As Marianne walks from the baroness’ room back to the baron, his mother seems to stalk Marianne, the lighting on the baroness’ face making her look truly evil.  But Marianne is able to throw the baron the key.

       As Marianne finds the baron, his mother condemns her, “You little fool, you don’t know what you’ve done.”

      The baron speaks with quiet assurance, “She can’t harm you
    now.”  Then,” Mother, come here.  Now mother, come along with me.”

       Like Marianne, you can only guess what happens next.   But you get a clear enough idea when Marianne speaks to Greta, now hysterical.  Greta tells her that the countess is dead. “He’s free, the cunning devil… She’s dead and he’s free.”

    image

    Baron Meinster (David Peel)  

    Marianne leaves. Greta, still hysterical, speaks a long while to
    the dead baroness.  She is able to sum up her twenty years with the family into a few minutes of monologue.

       Keep in mind this movie was made in 1960, with many limitations in effect on what movies could not show, not mention, only hint at.  I think any aspiring screenwriter could do a lot worse than to listen to Greta’s words, for the way they hint at family dysfunction, with so many suggestions, implications, so much between the
    lines.  “Twenty years…You encouraged him.  You drank with him and his friends, laughed at their wicked games…brought women to him…”

        Critics have read many suggestions in these words:  Bisexuality, procuring victims after the baron became a vampire, just for starters.  But the more subtle suggestion: an incestuous relationship between mother and son (in all senses of the word).  Whatever the relationship was like once, it degenerated into hatred and a vicious struggle for power, stalemated for years until Marianne’s arrival.  The contempt the Baron feels for his mother is
    obvious in his voice.  Their years of separation have only made the situation uglier.

       Next morning, Marianne is found unconscious on the road by Dr. Van Helsing.  The story now takes a new turn: Van Helsing matching wits with Baron Meinster.  As in Horror of Dracula, Van Helsing is a man of great courage, knowledge, and dedication.  In absolute contrast, Baron Meinster is ruled by his passions.

       But you soon learn that he has an ally; Greta’s devotion to the Meinster’s is unchanged, even after the baron has turned his own mother into a vampire.

      After the baron kills a woman from the village, she is buried in the churchyard.  In a truly chilling scene, the undead woman struggles to get out of her coffin and through the soil above it.  Greta stands above her, and like a sinister midwife, urges her to push herself free.  Even Van Helsing’s eyes open wide.

       As in Horror, Van Helsing is dedicated (some would say, fanatically) to wiping out the plague of vampirism.  Though not a particularly pious man, he sees this struggle as one between absolute good and absolute evil.  He calls staking the dead village woman, “an act of healing.”  When he meets the baroness, now a vampire herself, she asks Van Helsing if he knows who she is. “I know who you were,” he tells her calmly.image

    Van Helsing–again, the only one to offer protection from
    the Undead

    She has become a tragic figure, telling Van Helsing she now must
    do all the wicked things her son tells her to do; there is no
    salvation for her.  Again, Van Helsing tells her salvation is still possible.

    image

    Marianne sees Meinster’s powers–former friend, now a
    vampire 

    In the end, Van Helsing must face the baron, along with Greta and
    two other vampires: the woman from the village, and Gina, another student-teacher at Marianne’s school.  Van Helsing
    shows true courage after Baron Meinster bites his neck, cauterizing the wound with a red-hot iron, then cooling it
    with Holy Water.

       At least one critic has called Brides of Dracula the best movie Hammer ever produced.  I wouldn’t quite go that far, but the
    direction, acting, and especially the screenwriting are all excellent.  As big a Hammer fan as I am, I seldom remember much of their dialogue.

         Here, there are some memorable lines.   Marianne says good night to the baroness, adding, “God bless you.”

        “If only He could,” the Baroness replies.

       David Peel, better known on-stage than in movies, is excellent in a demanding role, requiring (among other things): charm, vengefulness, pleading, gloating, bloodlust, pain, viciousness, even vulnerability.  Terence Fisher’s direction underlines Marianne’s struggle to find the truth behind the family’s masks.  Marianne is trusting, probably too much so, and her ability to judge from intuition is limited. Fisher shows you the anguish in her confused search to find the truth.

       It’s hard to believe now, but at the time, the director Fisher, and Hammer films were widely attacked forthe violence they showed onscreen, the sexual innuendo they hinted at.  Years later, Fisher, and screenwriter Jimmy Sangster’s work was put into clearer perspective, and many critics began to praise them.

        Both Sangster and Fisher wanted to show just how corrupt and foul vampirism was.  Here, the evils of vampirism are often overshadowed by the festering illness of the the Meinster family.  In Brides, you get the feeling this illness must be disinfected, or cut out like a cancer.

    . image

                                       Baron Meinster’s disciples   

    Fisher made a point of showing what that surgery was like, without much subtlety.  He believed that suggestion cannot show this visceral ripping, this tearing out.  Long before TV had er, Fisher and Sangster showed you the operating room, up close and personal.  Ultimately this is what Van Helsing meant when he tells the dead girl’s ( bitten by the Baron) father that unearthing her body and staking her will be “an act of healing.”

  • THE NIGHT STALKER

    A made–for-TV movie on a top-100 horror list.  Hard to believe, for sure. The Night Stalker is peculiar in some other ways too.  At times it is more of a newspaper movie than a horror movie.   Or an expose story about a police cover-up, that happens to have a vampire in it.

           But still it more than holds its own as a horror movie.  Even though, made for TV in the early 70’s,it could only show a limited amount of violence. (Remember, this is years before CSI or
    Law and Order SVU, let alone Criminal Minds.)  An excellent screenplay by the veteran writer Richard Matheson (The Incredible Shrinking Man, The Devil’s Bride, to name just a
    few) is one key.  When the suspense starts to come, you get
    some truly creepy atmosphere.  This is a credit to the
    director, John Llewellyn Moxey who had previously directed a movie in England with even more of a sinister atmosphere,
    Horror Hotel.

         Horror Hotel was set in present times, but in a lonely little town, looking like it had barely changed in years.   The filmmakers realized they needed to use a radically different approach for
    The Night Stalker.  Here, the setting is Las Vegas, with no fog and few lonely places.  It is bright lights, 24 hours a day.  Nothing Gothic about it.  More people working night shifts than day shifts.  Everything about it screaming–Modern.

         But when the reporter Carl Kolchak (Darren McGavin) learns about a possible serial killer, evidence definitely points to a maniac who thinks he is a vampire. Victims drained of their blood.  Killed only during the night.  Soon afterward, a hospital is robbed of its blood supply.  Kolchak, an intelligent, intuitive man, immediately senses a connection.

    You may find it hard to take a reporter as the main character in a
    horror movie, especially someone as full of himself as Kolchak
    is.  He is arrogant, believing himself to be the most insightful guy around.  And he is never shy about letting people know this.  His mouth and his attitude have caused him to lose one job after another.  But he has not changed.

         Yet at the same time, he follows the courage of his convictions.  In addition, he gains some sympathy due to this; He is forced to deal with law enforcement officials who are at least as egotistical as Kolchak is.  And more selfish.  They think like politicians, obsessed with making themselves look good, whatever the cost.   If other people have to get hurt in the process; too bad.  That’s the way it goes.  Kolchak is the last guy they want around,
    someone who is not only in your face, but steps ahead of them.

    image

    Carl Kolchak–his ego is infuriating to people in power

         Kolchak’s lady friend Gail finds him a book on vampire lore, and he educates himself real fast.   What Kolchak finds out about a vampire’s powers is not so different from what the heroes in Bram Stoker’s novel Dracula find.  Kolchak learns the necessary weapons: a crucifix, a wooden stake and a large mallet/hammer.  Stoker’s book mentions the vampire’s sensitivity to daylight.   It emphasizes too something that few or none of the Dracula movies had mentioned—a vampire’s physical strength at night.  Already you have seen the killer taking on a guard dog, a Doberman, and killing it with his hands, with barely a struggle.

    image

    A crowd of police is unable to stop the killer

         Kolchak’s intelligence lets him match the law enforcement people step-for-step, and later gets him a few steps ahead.  The police are stuck at a point Kolchak already got past; they think their suspect is insane, with vampire delusions.  Kolchak has seen enough to believe their man truly is a vampire.  He has already gotten a good look at this man, identified as Janos Skorzeny, said to be over 70 years old.  Yet Skorzeny has fought off several police
    officers and survived nightstick blows to his head.  He has
    also survived numerous gunshots, not just from handguns but from a shotgun as well.  Unless every shot missed him, very
    unlikely.

    image

    Gail believes in Kolchak and has the instincts to point him
    in the right direction

         Your perception of Kolchak changes once he decides to go into Skorzeny’s house alone.  Not every smart-ass narrator would have the nerve for this.  The scenes inside the house don’t grip you as hard as for example, similar scenes in Silence of the Lambs or the original Psycho.   Some, but not a lot of music is heard.  There is little use of editing for shock. Instead of Skorzeny suddenly jumping out and grabbing Kolchak, the movie simply shows him pulling into the driveway.

              Yet these scenes still carry their share of tension.  You already know what Skorzeny is capable of doing, in scenes at the blood bank and in the backyard and pool.  And Kolchak is not experienced in dealing with vampires—he’s no Buffy.

         In addition, Barry Atwater, who plays Skorzeny, creates a sinister, powerful presence.  An actor vaguely familiar from guest shots on a wide variety of TV series and three years on one soap opera, Atwater is up to seizing his big opportunity.  And without saying a single word. His expressions, his  intense hisses and sighs make up for the missing dialogue.

    image

    Barry Atwater as Janos Skorzeny

    As unlikely as it sounds, The Night Stalker may  have influenced Silence of the Lambs.  One small, brutal detail, the vampire keeping a woman captive, tied to a bed, hooked up to a blood bag.  Her face pale as a ghost, she is barely alive, her mouth sealed closed with adhesive tape.  Like Catherine, the Senator’s daughter in Silence, she is on schedule to die.  But not
    until she has served her purpose, for a killer who has no concept
    whatever of her as an individual.  Kolchak wants to save her but knows he must deal with Skorzeny first.  You feel for her and for Kolchak too, in this insane house.  You hope he is ready to deal with all he has gotten himself into, much the same as you feel for Jodie Foster, trapped in the pitch-black of Buffalo Bill’s basement.

         One more unique feature in regards to The Night Stalker.  It was the inspiration for a brief TV series, also starring Darren McGavin.

  • LET THE RIGHT ONE IN

        Once in a while, you watch a movie that is so good
    you doubt you can do it justice in a review.  Let the Right One
    In is that good.    The video box quotes a review
    calling it the best vampire movie ever.

        I‘ll take a pass on agreeing or disagreeing, only
    because it’s more than vampires.  What else is it?  It’s
    hard to know where to stop.  First, a movie about
    adolescence, a time of change that can be brutal.  Many of us
    feel the scarring the rest of our lives. 

        Not all of us will make it at all.  We may
    never escape the violence around us and inside us.  Do we
    slip away into a fantasy world because reality is unbearable?
     Do we decide to join the bullies, to hurt the people who
    were kind to us?  A lucky few find a way to stay out of the
    mean-ness and violence.  Others seek desperately for a drug
    or an obsession as their way out.

        Let the Right One In was made in
    Sweden but it’s no art film.  It’s got a gritty reality you
    will feel no matter where in the industrialized world you come
    from.  

        The movie’s director describes the story’s adults as
    being nearby, but unable to get the big picture.  They have
    enough problems of their own.   Divorce, alcoholism, unhappy
    marriages, putting food on the table.  Their kids need a lot
    more than their families can give.

        The movie starts out as a painful look at two of the
    outcasts, the victims.  One is Oskar, the target of bullying
    at school.   The other is Eli, a strange girl who moves in
    next door, who helps Oskar fight back. But Eli can never be one of
    the in-crowd; for a million different reasons.   Most
    important—she is exactly what she appears… a vampire.

        Your first look at Oskar is a quiet but agonizing
    moment.  Snow falls steadily on a dark night.  He
    replays a kid’s voice from school.  “Squeal like a pig,” the
    kid tells Oskar.  Anyone who remembers  
    Deliverance will flash back instantly to that
    moment, the ultimate bullying.  But you can figure out
    Oskar’s life easily enough, with or without that memory.  He
    looks down from his window, a knife in his hand, all vulnerability
    and sadness.

    .image

    Oskar–a bully’s victim, with all the desperation that comes
    with that

       Both Oskar and Eli are searching for love.  They
    slowly begin to look for love in each other.
     Victims/outcasts will never find this an easy path.
     You may find it too hard to deal with the violence inside
    you…or the loneliness.  You may never be able to get in touch
    with your gentle side.  You may find it too hard to listen to
    the other person—or empathize if you can listen.  You are
    bound to say things you will soon regret.  

        But the fortunate ones get past this, and form a
    true bond.  So much happens in this movie, but this is its
    heart—two people finding the path to form a bond.

        Oskar and Eli are characters you can’t forget.
     We have all known people like Oskar.  But Eli feels
    real too, a different kind of outcast.  To be with her, to
    stay with her, Oskar has to grow.  As the expression goes, he
    needs to find things in himself he didn’t know he had.

     image

    Eli–as much the outsider as Oskar is

         Your first looks at Eli show her loneliness,
    her vulnerability.  Wearing no winter jacket on a sub-
    freezing night, snow all around.  “I can’t be friends with
    you,” she tells Oskar before he can say a word.  Wanting to
    say she’s sorry in advance.

        One reason Eli is unforgettable; her emotions are so
    easy to recognize, to identify with.  But she is something
    more.  And this is another big theme in the movie.
     Years ago there was a Donovan song called
    The Universal Soldier.  Eli is something
    else, The Universal Outsider.  And more; the savior you never
    expected to be your savior.  

        You didn’t expect them to be the one to redeem
    you…for many reasons.  Maybe sexual orientation, like Dil in
    another great movie, The Crying Game.  Maybe
    their ethnic group.   Maybe they’re a whore.   Or older
    or younger, different education level, different social
    class/caste.  Eli could be any of them.  Oskar’s road is
    not that different from Fergus’, the IRA soldier in
    The Crying Game.  And Eli takes a lot of the
    chances that Dil took, in trusting anyone.

         Oskar’s first reaction to Eli is worse than
    ambivalent.  “You smell funny,” he tells her.  Watch her
    face; she tries not to cry.   You may be reminded of Fergus,
    when he first finds out Dil’s secret—he vomits.  

        Seated on the jungle gym, Eli looks down on Oskar.
     No big surprise; so does everyone else.  But he takes a
    chance with this strange girl, handing her his Rubik’s cube.

        Next morning, Oskar finds the Rubik’s cube in front
    of his house, its mystery solved.  He smiles cautiously,
    probably for the first time in the movie.  In his lonely
    classroom, he holds it, like a magic charm.  How many of us
    know that feeling, of finally finding a symbol of protection… or
    wish we did?

        Oskar finds her in the same place that night.
     “Do I smell better?” she asks him anxiously.  She tells
    him she is 12, but doesn’t know her birthday.  Oskar presses
    her on this question but all she will tell him is that she has
    never gotten any presents.  

        He offers her the Rubik’s; her first-ever present.
     She shows him how she solved it.  His gaze at her is
    longing.

        The next day, Oskar takes awkward steps to change
    himself.  But definitely a start.  Outside school, the
    bully, Conny waits.  His two friends step out of the shadows;
    one looks at least as scared as Oskar.  One more kid paying a
    high price to fit in.  Another reminder how easily one kid
    can turn on another.

        But for the first time, Oskar stands up to Conny.
      His expression shows he’s ready to deal with the pain he
    knows is coming.  Conny uses a branch to whip Oskar’s leg;
    one friend slashes his face.  They tell him, you better not
    tell.

        At home, Oskar continues being courageous, lying to
    his mother about his face.  When he sees Eli later, she’s the
    one to reach out.  She tells him, next time they hit you, hit
    back…hard.  She says she will help him if he is in real
    danger….”if I can.”

        We can identify with Eli; torn between wanting to
    reveal our secrets, and the fear of the consequences when we do.
     They go to the movies.   Another big step.   Eli
    asks, “Would you still like me if I wasn’t a girl?”  More
    mysteries, more doubts.  But one big difference; Oskar lets
    the question drop.  He is glad just to be with her.  
     

        But this movie won’t let you romanticize its story
    for long.  You’re seeing another story unfold—the story of
    Eli’s ‘father.’  You never learn how he first met Eli, how
    they decided to stay together.  My gut reaction; he wanted to
    escape his loneliness; he hoped Eli could fill the emptiness in
    his life.  He was willing to pay the price to be with her.
     

        And he has paid—big time.  He stalks the woods
    around the apartment complex.  If he can find someone alone,
    he kills them, hangs them upside-down, drains their blood, then
    disposes of the body.  Endless chances for things to go
    wrong.   And the times he returns home with no blood, Eli
    screams at him in frustration.  The movie refuses to let you
    forget how much Eli needs.  

        The strain is wearing him down.   Everything
    about him smells of desperation, even his lifeless hair.
     Again, the movie is honest with you.  It gives you a
    clear picture– what it costs to stay with Eli… already you sense
    Oskar will have to pick up where father has left off.  

         Days later.  You knew it was inevitable,
    but you still feel the impact when Eli’s father is trapped by
    reality… checkmated.  

        Not his fault.   But his attempt to kill a boy
    inside Oskar’s school goes wrong.  

        No way out.  He has planned for this; destroy
    as much of his face as he can with corrosive liquid, and cover any
    links to Eli.  And Eli is prepared too.  She visits his
    hospital room where he clings to life…then removes his breathing
    tube and drains his blood. 

        The movie takes a lot of chances; and big ones.
     The next time Eli is with Oskar, she asks if she can get
    into bed with him.  Oskar can feel how cold she is.

       Yet it is not a scene about sex.  They are miles
    away from being ready.   Instead the question is simply, can
    they be boyfriend and girlfriend?  The dialogue is risky.
     You may find it embarrassing, even ludicrous… or deeply
    touching.  But one thing is clear; these are people forced to
    be honest.  They can’t put on a “cool” façade…and they know
    it.

       “Do I have a chance with you?” Oskar asks her.  

        It takes Eli a while to realize he is talking about
    going steady.  When she at last understands, Eli says
    straight-out, “Oskar, I’m not a girl.”

        A long silence.  Finally Oskar says it doesn’t
    matter.  “Then you have a chance with me,” Eli tells him.
     Under the blanket she is naked, but completely covered.
     Oskar continues to face the opposite direction, never
    turning to look at her.  But she takes his hand.

        Again, an unorthodox, courageous scene and dialogue.
     Unexpected, almost unimaginable in the age of MTV.  Yet
    surprisingly believable.

         Oskar’s life has definitely taken a turn for
    the better.  He stands up to Conny and for the first time is
    left alone.  In Eli he sees the girlfriend he dreamed of, but
    never expected to find.  He has new-found self- respect.

        Much of this is due to Oskar taking the risk;
    trusting an outsider.  Yet he doesn’t know Eli as well as he
    thinks.  The years have taught her how to keep secrets.

        Oskar’s too caught up in himself to understand how
    much Eli’s life has changed.  She is vulnerable without the
    guardian who kept her supplied with blood… and paid rent.
     And more than that, the circle is closing.  Eli has
    already killed a man in the apartment complex.  The dead
    man’s best friend, Lokke, is not about to stop looking for the
    killer.   

        Desperate for blood, Eli bites Lokke’s wife
    Virginia, and almost kills her.  Virginia lies near death at
    the hospital.   Her husband decides he must become a
    vigilante; find her attacker.

         Oskar spends more time with Eli.   He
    notices more than one strange clue, odd coincidences.  As
    difficult as it is to believe Eli is a vampire, Oskar finds the
    evidence increasing.  No other explanation makes sense.
     

        The scene where Oskar brings his suspicion into the
    open will leave you breathless; you can picture how differently it
    could have turned out.  You see another big theme in the
    movie firsthand.

    image Oskar’s suspicions about Eli confirmed

        The theme of identifying with the oppressor.  
    In this case, the kid who got bullied, becoming a bully himself.
     Eli stands at Oskar’s door.  She says he must ask her
    in before she can enter.  Oskar stands motionless, silent.
     As if the power he holds over her is suddenly a drug.
     He makes a slight head-movement; trying out some new
    tough-guy body language.  Like… yeah, come in if you want,
    bitch.

        Eli takes a few steps inside.  Blood slowly
    begins to flow—from her eyes, her ears, even her scalp.

        Oskar gets it.  “You can come in!”  He
    hugs her.

        You feel the conflicts, the self-doubt.  Bitter
    words, the kind that end relationships.  Eli tells him she is
    the same as he is.   She throws it in his face– how he was,
    when they first met.

        “I don’t kill people,” Oskar answers her.  

        “No, but you’d like to…be me a little.”

        He once was happy being with her.  Empathizing
    with her is not as easy.  They stand there, at the edge of
    the cliff.  One possible road—end it now, turn their backs.
     Or… keep trying to trust each other.  They survive this
    hard test.  

        But they face worse tests down the road.  More
    surprises are left to come.

        On a less serious note, many who haven’t seen the
    movie want to know–Is it scary?

        My answer; yes, but what makes it frightening does
    not have much to do with vampires.  The filmmakers wanted
    their story to play out as realistically as possible: the
    struggles at school, family problems at home, and being close
    friends with a vampire.  They did not want the look and feel
    of the movie to change when Eli uses her powers.  The idea is
    to basically leave you alone, to watch the characters, the story,
    the themes.

        One more scene is worth a description.  Oskar
    free and easy, alone with Eli.  Happy to have found a girl of
    his own, and more, a girl who knows exactly who he is and still
    wants him.  He hopes to do what romantic teenagers do—each of
    them will cut their fingers, then press them together.

        Of course this fantasy is doomed.  Eli’s
    craving is impossible to miss once Oskar cuts his finger.
     She tells him to get away from her—now. 

        Like a junkie, she attacks the first stranger she
    sees; a woman with a husband walking just behind her.  An
    unlucky choice.

        Not a feel-good romantic movie.  Love carries a
    heavy price.  Eli and Oskar are barely past their childhoods,
    and faced with a daily struggle to survive.  You see
    crystal-clear how hard the road is.  What gives this movie
    its power, its resonance, is just how badly you want them to make
    it.