Category: Monster

  • THE THING (1982)

        Many people know how this movie was overshadowed by the incredibly popular E.T. when it first came out.  It was a box-office bomb for Universal Pictures.  But gradually its reputation spread by word of mouth, until, about twenty-five years later, many people rate it among the best horror movies ever.  I definitely
    would not go that far, but The Thing definitely packs a punch to the gut.

         I remember how disappointed I was with this movie the first time I saw it. I can recall what Ithought was missing in The Thing.  What I wanted to know about was the terrible change from being human to becoming  the ultimate alien monster; do you feel
    horrified, ecstatic, or perhaps a rush roughly like adrenaline but more intense, as you sense your new powers.

        Watching this movie now, I still would lovesome answers to my questions.  But I don’t think the filmmakers had this in mind.  It definitely did not come up during the Commentary included in
    the deluxe DVD with John Carpenter and Kurt Russell. They
    focused squarely on other issues.

        First, how does a group of people not trained for war react when suddenly face to face with an enemy different from anything that people have ever fought?  Second, how do they cope with the
    sudden paranoia when they’re surrounded by people in a closed
    space, and some of them could be already infected by the Thing?

       Questions about exactly how  and when the infected people got infected go unanswered.  Many plot threads are left dangling at the end.   But then again, that’s not what this movie focuses on.

        What you get instead are the desperate strategies these new recruits try to use, when suddenly threatened with a life-form capable of taking over the whole planet.  (In just over three years,
    according to Blair’s computer.)  And the added desperation of knowing that any of the people around them could already have been taken over by this life-force.  This is the focus of The Thing, not any deep philosophical questions.

        The Thing begins in the brightest of daylight with one unanswered question.  Why are these Norwegian researchers risking their own lives, and those of the Americans, to kill a dog?  The Norwegians seem hysterical with panic, but why?  When one of them injures a member of the Americans to get to the dog, he is immediately shot dead.  Zero chance for explanations.

        One of the M.D.’s, Copper, and the helicopter pilot MacCready fly to the Norwegian base to investigate.  The clues they find suggest something horrible but impossible to pin down.  Every
    building burned.  A bloody axe buried in a wooden door.  A man sitting, now frozen, his wrists and throat slashed with a straight razor.  Strangest of all, the body of a distorted man, combined with some other lifeform, frozen in the snow just outside the
    buildings.  The face contorted, seemingly stretched into two distinct halves, facing slightly different directions.

    image

    MacCready finds a Norwegian dead, an apparent suicide…no
    explanation

          MacCready and Copper fly the frozen body back to base.  It is dissected but its internal organs appear normal.

       Each man on the base does his best to resume life as
    usual.  Bennings, the man shot in the leg, hopes that a
    card game will relax his nerves.  A dog, the same one the
    Norwegians tried to kill, brushes against him, making him
    jump.  This dog has been wandering the rooms and passageways
    of the base all day, with everyone’s mind on other things. Bennings asks Clark, the man responsible for the dogs, to put this one in the pen with the others.

        The dog hesitates at first, then enters the pen and lies down, not sure what the others will do.

        You can’t tell how the pack will figure out who’s now the dominant dog.  Whether dominance can be established without a
    fight.  The other dogs make threatening signs.  Can this battle be settled without bloodshed?

        Suddenly this question is shoved aside for all time, as the conflict changes into something worse than most nightmares.  Personally I cannot recall ever having a nightmare as bad as this.

        The dog’s fur and skin rip apart.  From this mass of naked muscle, legs tear themselves free, spider-likelegs, but from a spider as big as the dog.  Unearthly shrieks come from the mass of flesh and contorting legs. Venomous-looking liquid shoots out of somewhere in this formless creature, covering one of the dogs while structures looking like tentacles strangle it.

    image

    The dog–starting to change

    Congratulations.  You’ve just witnessed the best special effects in movie history, the first of several in The Thing.  Someday someone will accomplish more, using CGI, but this is still the champion for right now, over 45 years and counting.

        The camp’s other M.D. Dr. Blair, and MacCready,the chopper pilot, are starting to get the big picture now and it is plenty ugly.  What they are dealing with is an extra-terrestrial form of life with the ability to change\ itself into a perfect replica of another form of life.  It can copy one of the humans as easily as it can one of the
    dogs.  Blair becomes obsessed with cutting off all the Thing’s possible escape routes, shooting the rest of the dogs, and destroying the helicopter, tractor, and the computer system.

        MacCready appears less educated than the others, but he is the most intelligent, resourceful,and courageous.  In addition, he is an excellent detective, taking clues and quickly using them to
    gain insight.  Along with Blair, he is the first to feel the coming wave of paranoia that will soon sweep the others:  Given its capabilities to mold itself, any one of them could be harboring the Thing.

        You can sense the paranoia after Dr. Copper thinks of a way to identify the Thing using refrigerated blood kept for emergencies.  But the crew finds the entire blood supply is gone.  Accusations
    and counter-accusations fly. The intense fear is masked with
    an anger, genuine fury, probably the crew’s best defense against panic.

    image

    MacCready: “Trust’s a hard thing to come by these days.”

         A new blood test is devised, but order is on the verge of crumbling.  Garry, the only man with a key to the blood supply has become a prime suspect.  Other major suspects: Dr. Copper, who often gets access to  blood, and Clark, due to the long stretches of time he spends with the dogs.  Blair, the man with the deepest insights into the Thing’s biology, is kept prisoner after his spree of
    destruction.  Garry is deeply offended about being accused, and refuses to be leader any more.  MacCready, with his courage and decisive nature takes charge; he is all that stands between the crew and chaos.

        The new blood test is given.  Without giving too much away, leave it at this:  All the guesses as to the Thing’s identity (to be fair, all were backed up with some logic) turn out to be dead wrong.  In a few scenes,which match the dog-transformation scene in their power, the Thingis brought out of hiding, in ways that are as imaginative as they are horrific.  To repeat one of the most quoted lines in The Thing, one astonished crew member
    stares at a new lifeform the Thing created, saying “You gotta be fucking kidding.”

        The death toll mounts, but no one can say which of the survivors has become the Thing’s latest replicated form of life.  Scariest of all is MacCready’s idea, probably sound thinking: The Thing will be happy to go to sleep in the intense cold and wait until spring to revive itself. He sees only one answer, and it means sacrificing all who have survived this far, “We’re going to have to warm things up around here.”

        Plenty of plot threads are left hanging What was the deal with the torn-up uniforms?  Who turned on the light in MacCready’s shack?  Whatever happened to Nauls?  Just forget these details for now. This movie finally puts to rest, the man in the monster suit with the zipper down the back.

        Listen to the Commentary, and appreciate how much the technical advances meant to the filmmakers’ sense of creativity.  As much as we all loved E.T. we can now appreciate how alien a form of life from another solar system might be.  Especially a form of life with the intention of re-populating our planet.

        I can’t say enough good things about Rob Bottin’s special effects.  We are all less fortunate for the limited amount of work he has done since, after reportedly burning out to keep up with finishing this movie.  The music by Ennio Morricone (The Good the Bad and the Ugly) is chilling, with two notes, like sinister heartbeats repeating again and again, building the tension.  Kurt
    Russell (MacCready) has never been better.  The rest of the cast, mostly familiar as character actors, are excellent as well.

    The Thing begins with some rather conventional flying-saucer effects.  What comes next is anything but conventional.  Forget the loose ends in the plot.  This is one movie that will grab you and not let go.

  • THE BROOD

         Many of us have heard about “cycles of family violence. “  How this violence is likely to pass down from the abused child to their children when that child becomes a parent.  Maybe you are talking to someone about a painful childhood, and suddenly they stop and say, “I’ve become my father.”

    Or my mother… take your pick, whatever applies.   If you know enough family history, you may even be able to trace the inheritance of abuse from generation to generation, until someone is able to put a stop to it.
    Psychologists call this “the break generation,” the one who
    ends the cycle.  One example was John Lennon, an abandoned
    son himself.  (To be fair to Lennon’s father, he did offer John the chance to live with him and was turned down, when John was a young child.)

    Years later, Lennon chose the life of stay-at -home father while his second son, Sean was growing up.  He also worked hard to make up for the time he had missed with his first son, Julian, after he and Julian’s mother were divorced.

    Most of us have heard stories about physical manifestations—people so ill for example that they fantasize about being crucified, and then develop marks on their hands as though nails had been driven through them.

    The Brood plunges you straight down into a bad dream combining these themes:  The cycle of family violence, and the stories of physical manifestations.  I don’t want to give away too much as to who—or what, the Brood are, except to say that they are child-like beings.  And that certain abused people can use them to strike out at those who hurt them.

    Frank, a divorced father with a young daughter, Candy, believes his ex-wife Nola is abusing Candy, and that he needs to keep Nola away from her.  Frank has plenty of good reasons for his suspicions.  He can see bruises on Candy’s back.  Second, Nola has committed herself into a psychiatric institute, known as Somafree.

    Somafree is run by Dr. Hal Raglan, whose therapy methods are controversial.  Some call him a genius. They rave about his book
    The Shape of Rage concerning childhood abuse. Others, some of Raglan’s former patients, say he has made
    them worse, and are preparing lawsuits against him.

    Frank has seen moments of Raglan at work with patients when he visited Somafree to pick up Candy.  He can see the man’s
    charisma, and his sharp insights.   But Frank can also see a
    man with an ego out of control, taking people to places where they may well be dangerous to others and themselves.  And there is no mistaking the bruising that he sees on Candy. Raglan’s approach is for Nola, like his other patients, to confront her rage toward her parents.  Nola’s mother is an alcoholic who abused her and continues to deny it happened.  She still drinks heavily, even when Candy is with her.  Nola’s father Barton was a weak man who stood by and let the abuse go on.

    The director David Cronenberg has talked about how personal feelings concerning his painful divorce went into writing and directing The Brood.  The stories are most insightful. But the movie itself is the ultimate proof of those intense emotions, and of his directing skill.

    Years ago, one critic described The Brood as Cronenberg’s one good film.
    At that time, this was arguably a fair criticism.  But since
    then, several other Cronenberg movies have shown this picture was no fluke.  Many people have their own personal favorites he
    directed, mine being perhaps his warmest and most hopeful,
    The Dead Zone.

    Cronenberg has been successful recently with two  mainstream movies, A History of Violence, and Eastern Promises. But years ago, he was known as a cult director with a reputation for the bizarre and the grotesque.  Martin Scorsese actually said he had been frightened about meeting Cronenberg for the first time.  (Cronenberg described Scorsese as someone “who should have known better.”)  In the media, Cronenberg was known as “the king of venereal horror” and worse.

    In these movies, ordinary people’s bodies went through incredible changes, disturbing, at times disgusting. They Came from Within: Human bodies were invaded by strange parasites described then as a cross between a penis and a large turd.  One character lies on his back, watching the outlines of the parasites as they move through his body.  Rabid:  a woman develops a
    hypodermic growth in her armpit that kills the men who embrace
    her.

    In The Brood, Dr. Raglan has been able to get some of his patients to express their anger into physical manifestations: marks on their bodies, or worse, tumors, “lymphosarcoma.”

    But with Nola he has gone much further. She has actually given birth to living creatures—other people at the Institute have mistaken them for children. These creatures, her brood, have a clear sense of who it is that Nola feels angriest with.

    Possibly a child advocate could argue that
    this movie exploits violence against children for the sake of
    horror.  They are definitely entitled to their point of view.

    My opinion:  this movie is much more than
    that.  It’s much more than the bad guys getting what they
    deserve, or a bunch of evil children who kill teenagers after
    the teenagers have sex

    .image

    A glimpse of the brood–in the house where Nola grew up

    The bad parents do get a kind of justice.  But innocent people get hurt too.  Cronenberg’s screenplay is not perfect but it’s good enough to make you care a lot about the main characters. For example, you feel Candy’s pain over and over again.  A sweet little girl who has never hurt anyone.  She is torn between two parents who both love her. She nearly sees her grandmother killed, then is terrorized by the same creature who did the killing.  You don’t realize until much later that she knows who these creatures are. Later they enter her classroom and quietly walk away with her into a snowstorm;  a scene that is poetic in the grimmest kind of way…one of the best moments in any Cronenberg movie.

    image

    Nola’s venomous wishes–made real

    You can criticize the ending as kind of clichéd, possibly a cheap shot.  But the image you are left with is something else—Candy’s sad, hurt expression as she sits in silence.

  • DUST DEVIL

        Dust Devil comes from a long tradition of stories with basic plot elements in common.

       They share these things:  Modern, well-educated people find themselves up against something straight out of an ancient legend/ folk-tale/ mythology.   These people must  overcome their
    disbelief,  then turn to traditional or ancient weapons.  Not contemporary science, which proves to be powerless.

        They must look to someone who knows the old legends…or perhaps, to some native shaman, wise man or magician who is familiar with the magic tradition in the myth.   Only they know what to do next.

        Dracula, The Exorcist, Curse of the Demon, Poltergeist, and The Last Wave all have subplots similar to this.   Remember the
    intimidating medical tests Regan must suffer through, in
    The Exorcist none of them doing her any good.  Modern science has great powers… but not over everything.

        But this formula is no guarantee of success—think of The Sentinel (1977) and Blacula, and lots, lots more.

        You get the broad outline of the
    Dust Devil mythology in voice-over as the movie begins.

        “The desert wind was a man like us; then grew wings and flew like a bird.  He became a hunter, like a hawk, and took refuge in those far corners of the world where magic still lingers.  Having once been a man, he still suffers the passions of a man…”

         How real will this legend feel to you?  That depends on another question.  It depends on how well you can accept the Dust Devil in human form; a man sounding and looking something like a young Clint Eastwood (High Plains Drifter, Pale Rider for example), wearing a long coat decorated with human bones.

      He is photographed in a way that reminds you of Eastwood in Sergio Leone’s films and later, in Eastwood’s own.

    image

    Listening for signs of life in the desert

    You see him first alongside a highway in a desert resembling the inferno–inside the nation of Namibia.  He is pressing his ear against the highway, which seems so empty that he is in no danger.   Soon a car driven by a lonely woman stops; she offers him a.ride.  Then… not much later, the chance to stay at her
    house.  The gardens and house feel like a speck of color in an endless wasteland.  Soon they are in her bed.  The Dust Devil breaks her neck, killing her it seems, in mid-orgasm.

    image

    Lovemaking abruptly cut off by killing

        He stops long enough to light several candles
    in her bedroom.  Then he uses her blood to sketch ritualistic drawings on the walls.  He cuts off several of her fingers then carefully saves them.

    image

    One of the drawings the stranger leaves

        Next, he finds a can of gasoline and sets fire
    to the house.  Much of it burns but definitely
    not all.

       The phone rings for Detective Ben Mukurob.  First he ignores it, thinking it is one of his sad,  frightening dreams.  He has had a lot of those dreams recently.  Except for a large dog sleeping close-by he appears painfully alone.

       Soon after, Ben gets another call, describing the burned house.  Your first impression may be (as mine was) that he is too cynical to care.   But that impression is very wrong.  He takes his job most
    seriously.

        Meanwhile, in the neighboring country of South Africa, Wendie, a home-maker in her twenties is arguing with her husband, Mark.  She makes up her mind to leave him and drives away.

        At the dead woman’s house, Ben speaks to his supervisor.  The boss is sure that this is the work of terrorists.

    image

       Ben–determined to bring in the killer

    Ben is equally sure it is not.  The political situation in Namibia and South Africa had changed recently, stabilizing in some ways.  Terrorists are less common now.

        Dust Devil does something uncommon:  voice-over is used to
    continue telling the unfolding plot.  As Wendie keeps her word about leaving, the narration continues:  “Out of the flatlands she came.  Into the drylands…He had been calling her…drawing her to Bethany…”

        Bethany, the Namibian town is indeed dying: no rain for seven years, its one major industry already shut down.  Wendie, in her car, and the Dust Devil in a train, have both picked Bethany as their next stop.

        More narration: “He sifts the human storm for souls.  He can smell a town waiting to die.”  You feel that Wendie and
    Dust Devil inevitably will meet;  it is only a matter of
    time.

         At the same time Ben talks to the coroner about the victim’s remains.  Neck broken, the drawings on the walls sketched  in her blood, probably mixed with body fat, iron ore, and kaolin (clay).   The coroner, a white woman, tells Ben who is African, that the
    killing is tied in with witchcraft.  She recommends he speak to a sangoma, an expert on witchcraft rituals.

       Ben has an old friend Joe who is a sangoma.   But the detective has turned his back on magic and rituals.  He aims to be more like Sherlock Holmes, or one of the CSI team, staying with rational,
    purely scientific explanations.

        As if it was fated, Wendie and the Dust Devil cross paths.  Wendie gives the stranger a lift, and immediately you feel the mutual attraction. They talk on and off; suddenly Wendie sees him on the road and realizes he is no longer in the car.  Hours later, alone in a motel room she takes a bath.  She makes a sudden
    decision to slit her wrists with a razor then abruptly changes
    her mind.

    image

    Ready and waiting for Wendie

       The Dust Devil can sense her wish to die.  He waits in the motel bedroom.  Wendie knows he is out there.  Next morning, as she prepares to drive away, he is already sitting in the car.

        Their attraction continues to grow.  They stop at another motel, dine in an outdoor café and dance to country and Western music played on loudspeakers.   In the motel room, they have sex.

        But afterward, the Dust Devil talks–more than he ever has before.  “You don’t understand…This wind keeps blowing me on and on…You don’t know who I am…”

        He showers and Wendie looks through his collection of snapshots.  They seem harmless enough. Then she finds severed fingers and knows she is in grave danger.  The Dust Devil tries to comfort her with the truth—“all these people wanted to die…I was only the midwife…”

        But Wendie no longer wishes to die.

         “You picked the wrong one this time, you bastard!” She drives off.

         Ben changes his mind; he talks to his old friend Joe despite his own doubts about magic.  Joe tells Ben that this is the work of a
    shape-shifter.  He adds, “You’ve got to stop thinking like a White man and start thinking like a man instead.”  He pleads with Ben to
    take a carved stick  with him, and keep it close. The stick has the power to bind the Dust Devil, to root him to the ground.

        Ben, with his strong faith in science and logic, has trouble believing this.   “You’ve been watching too many drive-in movies,”  he says, but does let Joe give him the stick, before leaving for
    Bethany.

          Wendie wanders out into a seemingly endless desert, followed by the Dust Devil, Ben, and Mark. All but Mark catch up to each other in a ghost town, every building with floors covered ankle-high in sand.

         Dust Devil deserves praise for originality in several  elements.   The music by Simon Boswell takes on many forms.  At times it feels reminiscent of Ennio Morricone’s work in Sergio Leone movies like The Good, the Bad and the Ugly and Once Upon a Time in the West.  Other times it is like a vocal chorus without words, as if the Earth itself is humming.  The photography is
    outstanding, showing the desert  barren, endless, devoid
    of color, a place where death is never far away and life is
    precious.  Check out the shot in the desert with the Dust Devil sitting absolutely still on a rock outcropping, and thirty feet higher up, vultures waiting calmly.

        Zakes Mokae, so good in movies like A Dry White Season and
    The Serpent and the Rainbow, is excellent a  the haunted Ben, and John Matshikiza equally good in the tricky role of Joe.  (He is also effective as the narrator.)  Robert Burke (Rescue Me,Munich) strikes most of the right notes as the Dust Devil.  To
    avoid leaving out anyone, the entire cast does the job.

        You may find still more influences that I missed out on, that have been borrowed by Dust Devil.

     Having said that, I still find this movie highly original and unusual.  I can’t recommend this one enough.

  • ALIENS

         I don’t write about many big-budget Hollywood blockbusters. But writing about Aliens feels like a privilege—like describing someone you feel honored to know. It has all of this: solid story, great characters, action, atmosphere. And several subtle under-texts I hope I can do justice to. Most obvious: the opportunity Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) gets to love a child again. First I
    need to confess I’m not a big fan of the original Alien. (Aliens was the first sequel to this original.) I remember being blown away by the first half of Alien, then sitting there watching the rest go downhill.
    I realize most viewers will not agree.  (Alien shows up on so
    many Best Horror/Best Sci-fi Lists). And viewers don’t really
    care about my complaints with Alien. The last thing I want
    to do is write a point by point comparison between the two
    movies.

    Ironically, I do want to give credit to the original for those elements in Aliens that carried over from the first movie…and there are plenty. It would be unfair to ignore those contributions.

    One of the original’s strengths was the memorable Ripley, the only survivor. The rest of the crew was savagely slaughtered. After Ripley’s escape she was left floating out in space—a long while.
       Aliens brings her back, and seeks to develop her character in much more detail. That is a lot to ask but the screenwriting (James Cameron) and acting (Sigourney Weaver and many others) are up to it. Alien showed us a character who inspired us—tough, courageous, loyal, creative…someone who refused to freak out under brutally trying circumstances.
         Aliens shows Ripley’s strengths as well. But in addition it fills in a much more complete character—everything I mentioned before, but someone who can’t leave her past experiences behind. Every time she sleeps, more nightmares about what she survived.

    image

    Birthing a mass killer; another in an unending series of
    nightmares

    And the 57 years she spent floating in space afterwards cost her dearly—the chance to know her daughter. A child when Ripley left. She died two years before Ripley was found. Ripley promised to be home for her birthday.
    Now, no way she can make up for her time away. She has simply
    missed out on her daughter’s whole life.

    image

    Ripley’s only attachments, 57 years later — Jones the cat, and
    corporate PR person Burke (Paul Reiser)

    Now we get a chance to know Ripley’s vulnerable side. A simple description —someone suffering post-traumatic stress syndrome. Her first goal—simply put her life back together. No rewards for destroying the alien—the corporation she worked for does not believe an alien even existed. They revoke Ripley’s license to work in space.

    She can live with that judgment; she never expected justice. What makes her furious is that the corporate people insist that everything is fine on that planet; the one where the alien was discovered, LV-426. They explain that colonists have settled there with no problems. What is there to investigate, the corporate executive asks her.
    Many sequels face a tough task—simply to convince you that the hero would return to the same place, to a similar situation they faced in the original. Cameron’s great screenplay does a
    believable job answering this question. Ripley is told that the
    corporation recently lost touch with the colonists on LV-426. They suspect the worst, and are sending in a team of Marines. They would like Ripley to accompany the Marines—as an “advisor.”
    At first, your reaction is the expected one—She would be crazy to go anywheres near there. But I think a lot of us can understand—even identify with, Ripley’s reasons. Most of all, she cares about the colonists who settled there. She knows what it was like to meet up with one of these creatures. Anything she can do to help, she is ready to do.

       And she wants to see the aliens destroyed…period. After experiencing the kind of killing just one can do, she wants to see the marines go in, like high-tech exterminators. Plenty of reasons—she not only saw the mature-stage alien kill friends, but watched the developing life-form killing others.

    (You may be fortunate enough to see a scene cut from the original release, but shown later on, making it even clearer. Ripley finds Dallas, a man who was possibly her lover, dying slowly from an alien parasite.)
    In Ripley’s nightmares she dies in agony—and releases another
    savage killer loose on the universe. She hopes she can put the
    dreams behind her. And getting her license back to work in space
    again; that is part of the deal.

    Ripley and the corporate negotiator Burke are the only non-marines aboard. The soldiers accept them only grudgingly. Nothing personal; you see the close-knit bond within this unit—they have learned together, grown together, bonded as a result. The officer in charge, Lieutenant Gorman, is a bit of an outsider too—most of his experience came from simulations…he is far from battle-tested.

    image

    .Marines; a close-knit group

    Arriving at the planet seems uneventful but bad omens are
    definitely there. Not a single human. Small spots of dissolved
    metal. Evidence of destruction—and worse—signs that one wing of the building was secured…as if it served as the colonists’ last
    stand.
    Then motion-sensors detect someone—who changes Ripley’s life. A young girl with\ tangled hair, a dirty face, seemingly unable to speak. She runs for shelter in a closed space behind a store-room—bites a marine who tries to pull her out. They choose Ripley to talk to her—she crawls through a narrow passage to do this, no hesitation.
    Ripley can sense this is the girl’s sanctuary—invading here is the
    ultimate threat. In addition, a fan spins overhead—a potential
    distraction, able to ruin many people’s concentration. Hard to
    maintain any serenity here.
    Through all this, Ripley does what she planned; grabs this child,
    but then holds her gently, tells her again and again, it’s okay. No words in reply, just scared, angry whimpering. Outside, the Lieutenant tries to question her, but his patience is long gone. Ripley hands her a cup of hot chocolate. Liquid sloshes onto her face. Ripley wipes it off. Her words so gentle:

    “That good, huh? Uh oh, I made a clean spot, guess I’ll have to do the rest. That’s a pretty little girl under there.” The girl stays silent but signs of humanity subtly returning to her face.  She finally speaks—tells Ripley her name is Newt; her brother, father and mother are dead—“Can I go now?” Instead of trying to take charge (and pushing her away instantly) by saying, “No you can’t.“ Ripley simply says she thinks Newt will be safer if she stays. Wonderful instincts.

    But Newt’s words are chilling—more so because she stays quiet…no need to shout to make her point. It won’t make any
    difference, she says.

    image

    Ripley makes the effort to bond with the lone survivor, Newt

    Just about the same time, a marine detects lifeforms in one building—the marines assemble a team to search and destroy. The lieutenant, Ripley, and Burke remain in the vehicle—watch helplessly from the relative safety inside. (Alien used this device,
    with great effectiveness.)
    Not that the marine training—or the sergeant in command, is
    incompetent, but one error after another spells sure disaster.
    Ripley realizes the grunts are walking just above a cooling
    system—stray fire could puncture it and destroy the whole
    installation. High power weapons can’t be fired; the grunts must
    use flame-throwers and other short-range fire—fight the creatures at close range.

    And the place is crawling with them. The lieutenant watches as the team is slaughtered— tries to come up with strategy on the fly—finds himself freezing up. It’s simply all going too fast for him—not simulation anymore.

    image

    Well-trained, well-armed, intelligent—Yet still walking straight
    into disaster

    Ripley tells him to pull the team out—then takes the wheel of the
    vehicle, and drives into the carnage to pull out the survivors. The lieutenant tries to grab it back, almost wrecking the vehicle. She reaches the few left—smashes her way outside. An alien lands on the windshield, breaks through it, reaches out for her. Ripley brakes, throwing it off, then runs it over. Corporal Hicks shouts at her that they are safe now; she is grinding the axle, close to destroying it.
    No contempt in his shouting; he knows she is sky-high on
    adrenaline. Hicks is a blend of quiet calm, and ability to think
    and make decisions in a split-second; she may remind you of the
    presence Audie Murphy brought with him, back in the 1950’s.
    Only three Marines who went inside get out alive. Prospects for
    survival feel like they’ve gone from poor to—even worse. Yet with
    all that, positive relationships still develop. Ripley’s courage
    under fire impressed Hicks. His ability to find his gentle side
    when he can afford to, and his tough side other times—both draw
    Ripley to him. Promise me you’ll kill me if the aliens ever get
    through, she asks.
         “Both of us,” Hicks tells her. He introduces her to a close friend—his high-power weapon. Hicks is a good teacher and Ripley a good
    student. She is fast to learn the basics.

    image

    Hicks; A corporal—now highest in the chain of command

    Meanwhile, Ripley bonds with Newt—not an easy task. At first, only traumatic memories link them—past violence and unending bad dreams. Sleeping is an ordeal for both. Newt tells Ripley her mother used to tell her there were no monsters…”but there are.”
    Again, Ripley knows better than to condescend to Newt—and ruin her credibility in an instant. “Yes. There are,” Ripley tells her. Not all of it clicks like Hollywood dialogue. Ripley tells Newt that her doll Casey doesn’t have bad dreams.

    “She’s made out of plastic,” Newt tells her. No snappy comebacks from Ripley. But she has the sense to know—you don’t always need them. She does promise Newt always to be there for her, gives her a locator device that Hicks had given to her.

    The story still has surprising twists and turns left. I wanted to mention some under-texts giving it more power. Okay… Like the original team of marines, Ripley eventually has no choice but to fight an alien at close range. Without the luxury of any gun. Either that or leave Newt behind as food for alien larva. You know what choice Ripley makes.

    image

    Absolutely committed to keeping her promises

    Cameron’s script is effective in creating vivid characters. But
    Cameron also shows good judgment—(generally) keeping elements thought up by writers of the original. Alien was not the
    first movie to use the concept of parasites in its story. But it probably took more time and energy on this concept than any movie before—carefully giving you a series of nasty glimpses…watching the alien grow from one stage to the next.

    image

    The facehugger

    First a lifeform with legs that wrap around a face, then shoves a tube down into your gut. An exterior skeleton falls away, but something remains alive inside you. Growing into an eel-like creature with sharp teeth that uses them to tear its way out. This lifeform grows into a fully mature alien.
         Aliens keeps most of this. One surprise; we find that the first stage (the “face hugger”) can move freely when outside its egg. One of these comes after Ripley and Newt with a vengeance. The rest of the crew is unaware of danger…unable to hear the two as they scream—another ironic reference to the original. Last—I need to mention this; highly unusual in the mid-80’s, especially in a mainstream Hollywood production. I apologize for not giving credit for this insight; I just can’t remember who wrote this, where I read it.
    The writer mentioned Ripley’s sudden realization that one alien is a female—and a mother…like herself. She looks this alien in the
    face just a second, before annihilating a roomful of offspring—a momentary look of apology…one mother to another. I didn’t catch this the first time I watched Aliens; watching again, I am still not sure I see it. But forget me a minute; my job is point things out that others may appreciate; I wouldn’t want to leave out this point. Decide for yourself if you notice it.

    image

    Woman, samurai, mother

  • THE EXORCIST

         The Exorcist was a courageous movie for its time and place— the United States in the early 1970’s.  Even though William Peter Blatty’s novel had been a best-seller, producing this movie and getting it distributed were far from easy.

       The Exorcist was not a typical 70’s film; it was not afraid to paint its picture in bold colors, showing good and evil as two distinct forces… forces fated to battle face to face.

    Ironically, this was a major reason for its box office success.  America was in need of hopefulness.  The Exorcist left you feeling that courage and faith might be rewarded, not tossed into the garbage.  Along with Jaws and Alien, The Exorcist was a major force in pushing horror movies into the mainstream.

    The early 70’s was still a time of much angry social/political finger-pointing.  But this movie was not afraid to make its statement; that  some issues were simpler than conservative vs. liberal, pro-choice
    vs. pro-life.  In doing this, it raised your hopes of finding heroes willing to go to war with evil, not to watch passively.

    The evil in The Exorcist is not suggested; it is shown, more graphically than anything up till that time.   The movie broke new ground in its violence and sexuality.  No movie before it had dared to
    combine religious and sexual imagery like this one did, not even
    Ken Russell’s The Devils, which had received an X rating two years before.

    The Exorcist’s plot is not complicated—it deals with Pazuzu, an Asian demon, thousands of years old.  It asks you to imagine:  What if this ancient evil somehow possessed a young girl in present-day
    America?  And what if the girl’s mother (not Catholic, or even religious herself) was to choose Roman Catholic priests to
    drive out this demon?

    One major challenge facing the novel and the movie:
    how do you portray absolute good and absolute evil?  How
    would they speak?  What actions would they take?  The novel (and the screenplay, which followed the novel closely) had to make the dialogue and the action specific.
    In other words, this is how absolute evil and good would function in a real situation.  You would expect that each individual’s image of good and evil’s actions is highly personal.

    Let me give one crude, but memorable example. During the exorcism, the demon (through Regan’s voice) makes some
    vulgar sexual references to Merrin’s (the title character)
    mother.  To a sheltered, provincial person, these remarks
    might seem unspeakably vile, almost unbearable to hear.  To a
    tough, big-city kid, the same remarks sound no worse than
    something heard in their neighborhood playground.  Thoroughly
    not shocking.  But this is an exception, a rare example of bad judgment in the writing.

    Why is it this little girl, Regan McNeil, whom the demon chooses to possess?   Regan seems to be a random choice.  She is a special girl but not that special; most of us have been fortunate enough to
    know one child like her.

    Regan is not a saint.  But she is a sweet girl, clearly finding joy and hope in everyday life, even though her parents are separating, and her father seems unwilling to stay part of her life.

    image

    The daughter Chris can not forget; no saint but radiating an
    unmistakable sweetness

    Chris, Regan’s mom, is no saint either. But her importance in this movie cannot be overstated. Watch it again, concentrate on Chris, and you’ll see what I’m talking about.

    She is the good mother we all wanted, someone able to give unconditional love, and hang in for her child under the ugliest of circumstances.  That in itself is plenty.

    image

    Chris; not a larger-than-life figure, but the good mother we
    all wanted

    Most people are quite familiar with The Exorcist’s plot, from reading the best-selling novel, seeing the movie, or word of mouth.
    Everyone seemed to be talking about it, from legal secretaries to ministers in your neighborhood church.   The climactic exorcism scenes have passed into American folklore, lampooned on Saturday Night Live and the Scary Movie series by such well-known actors as Richard Pryor, James Woods, and God knows who else.

    A little more of the plot.  An American girl, about 11, experiences severe psychological problems with no explanation.  Along with out-of-control behavior come mysterious noises, then her bed shaking violently.  Her mother, Chris is like many of us.   She respects religion in general but rarely finds it meaningful in day-to-day life. Science, medical science, is where she looks for her
    answers to Regan’s condition.

    The tests Regan undergoes are painful and invasive.  But they do not help her in any way.

    image

    Many felt the pain Regan undergoes (and the limitations of
    modern Western medicine it underlines) scared them more than
    anything later

    And you watch a subtle change in this gentle girl’s response to the medical people, first defensive, then out-and-out hostile.  To a sensitive mother, Regan seems to be getting swallowed up– and silenced, by another force. You can easily overlook this insight, in the tidal wave of special effects to come.

    But Chris never misses this crucial thread.  She has a devastating sense of the real Regan being pulled into a pit.  Yet she knows that Regan’s gentle, sweet spirit can never be destroyed.image

    Regan–Her essence buried by outside forces

    A lot has been written about the special effects in The Exorcist, the hideous changes in Regan’s face and voice.  Most found them brutally terrifying.  More than a few found them laughable.

    Many intellectuals stuck to the old argument that showing something scary is never as frightening as suggesting it… leaving it to each individual to conjure up what is most frightening to them.

    But for many people (including myself), seeing the transformation onscreen was another story.   I think my reaction ( absolute terror) at watching Regan change was a typical one.  The make-up job on Linda Blair (Regan) and her dubbed voice, by veteran actress Mercedes McCambridge won well-deserved praise.

    Watching The Exorcist again for the first time in many years, what struck me was this: I could remember what Regan did in her possessed state, but not the timing.  Who else was there.  That some of the worst brutality and viciousness are experienced first, experienced alone by Chris.  The slap that leaves her face bruised for weeks.   Regan’s masturbation with the cross.  Regan pushing Chris’ face against her crotch. Her head turning to reveal an expression of hatred, of contempt for her mother.

    The masturbation is riveting partly because, as many critics said, it takes two totally separate entities, the sacred and the beastly, and smashes them together.  Those critics are absolutely right.

    But there is a second part to it.   Taking two such extremes and forcing them together this way, is to say to you in plain terms that every value judgment you make is meaningless. That it’s all a hopeless, pathetic joke.

    Hitler, Stalin, Charles Manson…they’re just like Gandhi, Lincoln, or Nelson Mandela.

    Chris survives the test.  Listen to the way she tells Father Damien, “You tell me that thing upstairs is my daughter.”

    Chris has looked deep into the heart of pure despair.  Yet she still holds onto her love and faith.

    As Regan and Chris’s story unfolds, another struggle is going on.  This is Father Damien Karras’s story. Father Damien is a priest and psychiatrist with the massive responsibility of counseling other priests at Georgetown University.   The endless demands and his growing guilt about his mother’s poverty and illness are taking a toll.

    His last visit to his mother is an eye-opener. She lives alone in an alien, threatening city landscape.  She has never made the leap from a Greek way of life to an American lifestyle and that isolates her even more.  The less she asks of her son, the more he feels her unspoken demands.  Money would not cure her problems but it could ease some of her sorrows.  And Father Damien has none to spare from his priest’s salary.

    And the vocation he has sacrificed for, no longer seems worth the sacrifice.  On the subway, Father Damien walks away from a beggar and his own lack of compassion saddens him.  Soon afterwards Damien’s mother dies in a pitiful city hospital; he cannot justify the hardships she was forced to live through.

    Ironically it is a medical doctor who gives Chris the idea of getting an exorcism for Regan.  Without showing you each intermediate stage, the story gives you an understanding of how a skeptic like Chris could take this path.

    Chris finally meets Father Damien to ask for help.  It is a quiet but monumental scene; you feel that both people have found what they needed.

    You learn much less about the man selected to conduct
    the exorcism, Father Merrin.  He had performed an exorcism
    years before and nearly died in the process.  He is also an
    archaeologist in the Middle East.  During his last visit, he
    has a premonition when he finds a small likeness of Pazuzu, then
    later finds himself standing face to face with a statue of the
    demon.

    The moment the two priests enter the house, you can
    feel the tension flooding, wave upon wave.   Father Merrin
    (Max von Sydow) is a combat-tested soldier with an unwavering
    attitude.  Father Damien has more direct connections to Regan.   From talking to Chris, he has gained a vision of the child and her goodness.

    Drawing the demon out is a more personal struggle for
    Damien than it is for Merrin.  Damien has more weaknesses and
    doubts; the demon means to attack these vulnerable spots.
    Regan and Father Merrin have already been pushed to their physical limits and are close to death from the strain.  Both could
    pay a heavy price for driving away the demon.

    image

    brutal mind-fuck aimed at Father Damien; the demon manifests as Damien’s’ mother

    image

    Father Merrin–ready to risk his life for Regan’s soul

    The screenplay gets rid of some of the novel’s hokey, borderline-macho lines from Father Damien when he challenges the demon.  A definite improvement.  The exorcism’s aftermath leaves you with a cautious optimism.

    No light beaming down from Heaven or angels appearing.   But a subtle peace on a human level. Watch the expression on Regan’s face as she kisses Father Dyer’s collar (Father Karras’ close friend).  It is a moment you will remember.

    This movie is a lot more than blood and the split-pea jokes that so many brought up at the time.   Faith is a highly individual part of each of us; not easy to change.  But this movie may restore our faith in finding heroes who keep their word, who risk everything to fight for something they believe in.