Author: phil

  • FORTRESS

    It won’t be hard to dismiss Fortress as a comic book, trying to disguise itself as a serious action movie.  But sadly, Fortress may be a more accurate prediction of the prison system than people want.  

         Worse, it may be a prediction of what people do want.  If you had the time to watch the recent Escape at Dannemora, you may feel some disturbing similarities between that and Fortress.  

         I worry how many MAGA people feel that prisoners have no right to talk about rehabilitation.  Or any kind of harsh conditions.  That prisons exist to punish criminals, period.  Fortress never mentions rehabilitation.  But it shows you a system where punishment is everything, the only thing.  For me, it also shows you some ominous signs of where our country is heading.

         One ominous warning near the beginning of Fortress.  An announcement to the new prisoners that this place is deep in a barren desert.  Even if you got out, the desert would kill you—fast. The upstate New York location of the real Dannemora is less deadly.  

         True, but tough enough.  Frigid temperatures, wind, snow, isolation.  People prepared for this location…in summer months anyway, stand a fighting chance.  Most escapees don’t.

         More subtle but ominous too.  The movie starts with a highly decorated war veteran and his wife arrested for conceiving a second child.  Never mind that their first child died as an infant.  No laws to protect couples whose baby died that young.  That’s their bad luck, the law is the law.  Crime does not pay, as they hear over and over and over again.   Law and order.   No talk about what is fair.  Don’t whine about fairness.  Don’t do the crime, blah blah you know the rest.

         Another similarity between Fortress and Escape at Dannemora; prisons run by corporations.  I understand; some of the technology in Fortress is still in the future.  John Brennack, the hero in Fortress gets a warning his first night in the prison.  “Don’t dream.”   What could that mean?  

         He dreams of better times, he and his wife making love.  Cut to a guy in a control room with multiple screens watching the action.  Brennack wakes in excruciating pain.  

         People can say, c’mon… that stuff’s way in the future.  But I suspect many felt the same way about AI, not too many years ago.   Or tasers or electronic ankle bracelets years before that. Another obvious question, who monitors the corporations running the prisons?  In Fortress, the corporations’ emphasis is heavy on threats and pain.  Prisoners are intestinated—an internal device inserted in their bodies (you’ll never guess where) to keep them in line.  A quick, easy way to subdue them—with devices to cause intense pain…even kill them when security feels it is necessary. 

         Another movie to use as comparison, Clint Eastwood, Escape from Alcatraz, released 1979, set in 1963.  So many themes in common: A cruel muscle man {the Wolf} intent on raping anyone weaker than him, a vicious warden intent on breaking your spirit, an escape through the guts of the prison infra-structure.

         Okay but what are the main differences?  Frank Morris {Eastwood} is serving a long sentence—for armed robbery.  In Fortress, Brennack and his wife Karen are serving long sentences too.  But their crime; wanting another child; that they will love unconditionally.  Even with the brutality and sick blackmail they face, Brennnack and Karen never lose their compassion in this hell on earth.  it is society that has lost any sense of justice, fairness; and empathy.  Is this where the MAGA people are steering our country?  Ii’s looking that way.  

         Brennack comes in contact with a cross-section of the standard maximum-security prison characters.  Clearly he is a survivor but much more sympathetically sketched out than Frank Morris or Manny (Jon Voigt} in Runaway Train.  Does it matter?

         Yes, and I think this is why.  The prison system shown in Fortress aims to grind everyone, not just the hard-asses, into ground concrete.  Those who raped, killed and tortured twenty five years ago and still enjoy remembering those days; need to stay locked up…of course.  But these are not the only prison inmates,

  • THE AWAKENING

    England, 1921.  A country still in shock from World War I and an influenza epidemic that killed more people than the war.  “A time for ghosts” the opening titles read. A whole industry has sprung up; taking advantage of people’s desperate need to reach those they loved, now dead.  Seances, psychic readings, mediums, the works.

         Florence Cathcart is not a believer in ghosts, and has written a well-respected book stating her views.  One of her activities is exposing the scammers who take advantage of people’s grief.  So many potential victims out there.

         We see her breaking up one seance, and her contempt for the people staging it.  You’re charlatans and more than that, poor charlatans, she tells the people staging the event.  

         As effective as Florence is, she shows no satisfaction at protecting her clients.  One of them is furious; she asks if Florence ever lost a child.  Florence, who never seems at a loss with words, has no quick answers for her.  She seems drained of emotion.

         Soon after, a schoolteacher at a boarding school asks her for help. A boy has died at his school under mysterious circumstances. He knows her reputation as a ghost hunter.  You can’t hunt what doesn’t exist, she answers.  

         “We think it does,” he tells her quietly. He is assertive but she gives him a flat-out no.  Yet we see them soon after in a car headed for the school.  No explanation given; a mystery that will unfold at a slow pace.

         The school is a colorless, bleak place.  Strict discipline but empty of warmth.  Maud Hill, the matron, provides what little kindness we can find.  Maud says she’s read Florence’s book…more than once.  She is definitely an admirer.  Again, we feel the staff’s desperation.  They may or may not believe in ghosts but they are at their wits’ end.  The boys are terrified too.  Almost too scared to answer any questions but direct enough: “Kill it, miss.” 

         Florence has come prepared with equipment; the latest instruments to capture supernatural phenomena—if she finds any..  

        She finds the death of the boy easy to solve.  Not the work of ghosts.  The students and the staff are much grateful to her.  And yet Florence is neither satisfied nor eager to leave.  What is keeping her?   The school is empty of warmth.  Maud Hill, the matron, provides what little kindness we can find.

         Florence has come prepared with equipment; the latest instruments to capture supernatural phenomena—if she finds any to capture.  

        She finds the death of the boy easy to solve.  Not the work of ghosts.  The students and the staff are much grateful to her.  And yet Florence is neither satisfied nor eager to leave.  What is keeping her?   
    The easy explanation—to find what is missing in her life.  She has heard brief references to a boy dying years before at the same location—someone’s home then, not a school.            Something in those questions is drawing her in.  The angry question from the woman on the street—it may be an isolated experience.  But it may pose questions as to what Florence is searching for.  People in her life she treasures.  A mission of some kind that brings her fulfillment.
    The school schedule has reached half-term.  All the boys get a week off with their families.  Except for Tom, whose parents live in India, an impossible trip in just one week.  Tom and Florence talk about her dead fiancé…killed in the war. Florence loved him.  But she sent him a letter saying she had no feelings for him.  He died soon after.  

         A miniature doll’s house in an empty room brings back other memories to Florence.  A man insane with jealousy, ready to kill his wife—he is sure of her unfaithfulness.  Florence and Tom find themselves staring at the doll’s house…inside the house that later became the school. 

         How much is Florence’s imagination, how  much is her memory?  The matron Maud seems to recall a lot of the tale.  “I don’t think there’s a place on Earth where people can understand loneliness better than here,” she said to Florence earlier.  You can’t take her words lightly. She was a servant too when the school was home to a doomed family, then a matron after it became a school.

         Don’t expect many jump scares in The Awakening.  Instead, you will get emotion; you watch a woman searching for answers—a woman who once felt she knew everything she needed to know.  She solved one mystery—people can’t understand any reason for her to stay after that.    The last 30-40 minutes of this movie shoot by quickly.  Stay with it, stay with Florence as the revelations come to her.  These discoveries pack a punch, a mean one. Her story—and Maud’s and Tom’s, will rivet you.  

  • DEATH LINE/RAW MEAT  

    Under its trashy-looking surface, Death Line holds some unexpected treasure for those who pay attention.You’d expect a wide spectrum of opinions from its viewers.  Especially from those lucky enough to catch it without cuts for time or violence.   

         For me, and for a lot more people, one theme couldn’t be missed. While we are living our quiet, ordinary, uneventful lives, a hidden sub-society is living out a miserable existence just out of reach. People neglected, then soon forgotten. But able  to reach out and grab one of us at certain isolated, unexpected moments.

         Anyone who heard about them, saying, Don’t look at us, we declared bankruptcy—these creatures are no longer our responsibility.  Don’t tell us we needed to do anything more for a bunch of cannibal-monsters living underground.  Except maybe request the police to round them up or shoot them dead.   

         Sorry, but we filled out all the legal documents required.  If you have to, we can even show you—they’re all on file.  

         About eighty years before, (so the story goes) people started work on some new subway lines in London.  But a roof collapsed and the people in charge decided to scrap the whole construction..

         But no one took responsibility for the subway workers left underground.  They were simply left to die.  Some rumors that their food was soon gone but they might have enough water to survive a short while…maybe not so short.  At least that was possible. 

         Death Line paints a vivid picture of that nightmare.  Decades later several generations of people had survived.  Did they survive on meat from people they slaughtered in the subway near their hiding places…or were they forced to eat each other?  And what was life like for the people they grabbed, as they waited to die?

         Another, more subtle theme in Death Line—a class system, with the monster-survivors at the lowest step on the ladder.  

         Watch the law enforcement people investigating disappearances in the subway system.  Calhoun, the chief inspector (Donald Pleasence, great as always).  Then Detective Rogers, who is expected to follow Calhoun’s every command and to tolerate his frequent sarcasm.  One step below Rogers, a desk officer who reports to him.

       Near the top, above Calhoun, is an M.1.5 officer investigating the disappearances.  When he runs into the M.1.5 officer, Calhoun bluffs, tells him, this is my jurisdiction, I have every right to be here.

         Maybe for murders of greengrocers and other nonentities, the M.1.5 man tells him.  But the missing person is a fellow M.1.5.  You’re way out of your depth.  “Bye bye.”  Calhoun knows it’s time to stop bluffing.

         At the bottom of the totem pole, the cannibals.  Starting out with a long painful scene of the wretched place where they live.  A constant, intruding sound of water dripping.  Grating inside your head as the camera moves too slowly through rooms…endless agony.  Hold on, I don’t need to see all this, you think.  Let’s go back to the other people, the other locations.  

         Instead, you are trapped, as the camera moves through the ruins where people live and die, virtually alone.  Recently killed, side by side with corpses dead much longer, their eyes empty sockets.  Propped up against walls or piled on top of wooden bunks.  Along with the freshly-killed, maybe even a few not yet dead.

         Then another severest, the most unexpected shock—a deep empathy for the surviving creatures. In the sixty-odd years since Death Line’s release we have sat through an endless parade of zombie movies, endless sub-humans shot, beheaded, maybe ground up into bloody mush.  Here, you see creatures from a different subculture.  They will kill when they have to, but mostly they want to be left alone in peace., 

         But all their attempts at reaching out fall on deaf ears.  They have only learned one phrase of English, “Mind the doors,”  (spoken by subway conductors just before the train doors shut 

         For me, and for a lot more people, one theme couldn’t be missed. While we are living our quiet, ordinary, uneventful lives, a hidden sub-society is living out a miserable existence just out of reach. People neglected, then soon forgotten. But able  to reach out and grab one of us at certain isolated, unexpected moments.

         Anyone who heard about them, saying, Don’t look at us, we declared bankruptcy—they’re no longer our responsibility.  Don’t tell us we needed to do anything more for a bunch of 

    cannibal-monsters living underground.  Except maybe request the police to round them up or shoot them dead.   

         Sorry, but we filled out all the legal documents required.  If you have to, we can even show you—they’re all on file.  

         About eighty years before, (so the story goes) people started work on some new subway lines in London.  But a roof collapsed and the people in charge decided to scrap the whole thing.

         But no one took responsibility for the subway workers left underground.  They were simply left to die.  Some rumors that their food was soon gone but they might have enough water to survive a short while…maybe not so short.  At least that was possible. 

         Death Line paints a vivid picture of that nightmare.  Decades later several generations of people had survived.  Did they survive on meat from people they slaughtered in the subway near their hiding places…or were they forced to eat each other?  And what was life like for the people they grabbed, as they waited to die?

         Another, more subtle theme in Death Line—a class system, with the monster-survivors at the lowest step on the ladder.  

         Watch the law enforcement people investigating disappearances in the subway system.  Calhoun, the chief inspector (Donald Pleasence, great as always).  Then Detective Rogers, who is expected to follow Calhoun’s every command and to tolerate his frequent sarcasm.  One step below Rogers, a desk officer who reports to him.

       Near the top, above Calhoun, is an M.1.5 officer investigating the disappearances.  When he runs into the M.1.5 officer, Calhoun bluffs, tells him, this is my jurisdiction, I have every right to be here.

         Maybe for murders of greengrocers and other nonentities, the M.1.5 man tells him.  But the missing person is a fellow M.1.5.  You’re way out of your depth.  “Bye bye.”  Calhoun knows it’s time to stop bluffing.

         At the bottom of the totem pole, the cannibals.  Starting out with a long painful scene of the wretched place where they live.  A constant, intruding sound of water dripping.  Grating inside your head as the camera moves too slowly through rooms…endless agony.  Hold on, I don’t need to see all this, you think.  Let’s go back to the other people, the other locations.  

         Instead, you are trapped, as the camera moves through the ruins where people live and die, virtually alone.  Recently killed, side by side with corpses dead much longer, their eyes empty sockets.  Propped up against walls or piled on top of wooden bunks.  Along with the freshly-killed, maybe even a few not yet dead.

         Then another severest, the most unexpected shock—a deep empathy for the surviving creatures. In the sixty-odd years since Death Line’s release we have sat through an endless parade of zombie movies, endless sub-humans shot, beheaded, maybe ground up into bloody mush.  Here, you see creatures from a different subculture.  They will kill when they have to, but mostly they want to be left alone in peace., 

         But all their attempts at reaching out fall on deaf ears.  They have only learned one phrase of English, “Mind the doors,”  (spoken by subway conductors just before the train doors shut ).

    Even the monster in Bride of Frankenstein finds a friend in the blind hermit and learns to speak.  In Death Line, every meeting between the cannibals and the ordinary people (us) is doomed to violence.  This is one reason Death Line packs such a sting, even after order is restored and the situation is returned to normal.

  • Stake Land

    Stake Land is a movie with such power that it’s difficult to put into words what makes it hit so hard.  Its basic premise is far from original; some unforeseen plague has turned most of the population into vampires.  People live in small groups—or alone, without law enforcement—or the military, to protect them.  Basically—it’s everyone for themselves.  

        So far, no one seems to know whether a cure or remedy has been found, or even worked on.  No media is left to give people that news…or any other news.

        Probably the closest movie to Stake Land is the great road movie The Road.  But I don’t want to write a point by point, compare-and-contrast between that and Stake Land.  (So many other movies you can use as comparisons, even the horror/comedy Zombie Land.)   Many others can surely stand on their own.  Many even portray a similar theme—strong father/son relationships growing as the journey continues.

         I expect not everyone will love the dialogue and voice-overs as much as I did.  Especially people who don’t like Westerns—an inspiration for much of it.  The main characters—Mister and Martin, father-figure and foster son, rescue a nun who’s trying hard to hold onto her faith after rape and more violence.  “How many of those things did you kill?” she asks.

         “Not enough.”

         “What about him?  He’s just a boy.”

         “Yeah.  A live one.”  

     Martin’s family are killed only minutes into the movie.  Mister shows him all he can about protecting himself—his number one priority in this savage land.  In an early scene he puts a football helmet and shoulder pads on Martin and shows him how to use a sword.  Martin’s a fast learner.  So many times you sense he is watching Mister—what he says, what he does in order to survive.  Early in the movie their road is blocked—not just a truck but an actual  freight train.  But Mister knows his ticket out—prescription drugs, exchanged for escape. “People just trying to go home,” you hear on the voice-over.  Not exactly lyrical but so poetic at this moment.

         Another time, speakers blaring an Evangelical message from a pick-up truck, then a young woman hanging dead from a tree.  “In desperate times, false gods abound.” 

         But Martin learns from Mister’s generosity too.  They rescue a nun, then a woman in her final month of pregnancy.  No hidden motives on Mister’s part.  Martin can see it—Mister has clearly not lost his faith in humankind.

    Another part of Mister—unhesitating courage.  In one town, Mister talks about heading north.  A man advises against it—rumors of cannibals in the north.  (One of the scariest parts in The Road.)  “Fuck the cannibals”, Mister tells him. 

         The music in Stake Land is nothing sophisticated but works with great effectiveness.  You will find yourself noticing the music various times, as you stare at the wastelands and the dead sprawled out around the roads and the ruined towns the characters pass through.  If I had to sum up what the music conveys, I would mention the sense of loss people are experiencing.  Their wish to recover what they have lost.  Life before was no paradise but people are starving for it.  They want it back…they want it so bad.

        

  • FACE TO FACE

         Many consider Ingmar Bergman the greatest movie director…ever. Writing about a Bergman movie can be intimidating. We don’t want to say it’s great, simply out of respect for his past works. But we hesitate to put one of his movies down—we worry that people will think it went over our head.
    I missed Face to Face when it was first released, then had to wait a long time to find it. But it was more than worth the wait. It may not be Bergman’s best-ever, but definitely belongs among his best. Liv Ullman gives a performance that will knock you flat. I don’t have words to do her justice. Only to say this: sometimes you see a character go through a jarring transition; you say to yourself…what?
    Ullman makes such transitions…over and over; changes at lightning speed.  But all believable. Totally startling, but totally believable. She not only has gained a vision about her character; she finds the means to express it.
    (One warning—I did read some angry comments about prints
    with cuts or prints with bad quality. The DVD print Netflix
    sent me ran 2 hours, 16 minutes, with excellent quality.)

    You watch a woman stare at her reflection. A respected psychiatrist, competent at her job, beautiful, charming, a stylish dresser. But the face staring back at her is a terrified, brutalized little girl, and she cannot look away.

    image

    Jenny—eventually all her safety nets are gone

         Face to Face throws a lot of major themes at you. Maybe too many. I can’t deal with them all without writing way too much.
    I will concentrate on some realistic, down to earth themes. They all go back to this; what makes Jenny reach a crisis where she attempts suicide, then returns to work before dealing with most of her baggage? The first theme may sound like trivial, mundane
    bullshit…but it is not. You can describe it as the price a lot of us pay for saying everything is great…all the many, many times people ask us.
    Jenny, the main character (Ullman) was brought up to speak
    this way…or suffer some major consequences. Ironically, Tomas, the only character with enough motivation, skills, and knowledge to help Jenny, gives people virtually the same answers Jenny does. I’m doing fine. I’m happy wherever I am, blah, blah, blah.
    At times, he shows he is growing past this. And for much
    of their time together, he keeps his promises to her. But
    like Jenny, he is feeling pain of his own…plenty of it. Watching him, I thought of the drawing Sean Maguire (Robin Williams) in Good Will Hunting had sketched and hung on his office wall. A man in a rowboat, waves all around him, hoping he might survive the coming hurricane.

    image

    Tomas—determined to be there for Jenny, but suffering his own pain

    Of course, people will ask, “So Jenny was pressured to say
    ‘I’m fine’ all the time; I know plenty of people who got a
    lot worse abuse than that.” Sounds convincing, but only on the surface. So often, kids like Jenny was, are going through additional tough times:perfectionistic, alcoholic, dysfunctional families desperate to keep secrets. Parents intensely afraid of the
    outside world seeing them as they are. Pressure they feel to keep up the facade is brutal, and even worse for their kids.

    The movie is not detailed about Jenny’s family secrets. Jenny knows her dad was an alcoholic. That he likely molested her before dying when she was nine. Her mom died too, in the same auto accident.
    Her memories are scattered but some were always clear. The
    contempt her mom and grandma had for her father…contempt
    they eventually revealed to him. Then Jenny began to do
    the same. She felt guilty for what she perceived as her
    mean-ness. More so because her father spoke so much about
    needing her love. And confusing too, because often this
    was when he molested her.
    Her grandparents took her in. But they did their share of
    abuse too, though they meant it only as discipline, “tough
    love.” When Jenny got them angriest, they threatened to
    send her to an orphanage. The pressure to show the smiley-face for the world continued…maybe worse. Where does that leave Jenny’s present family—herself, husband Erik (a psychiatrist too) and daughter Anna?
    Erik seems to have grown up in a similar atmosphere. The textbook answer predicts two people striving to be who their families wanted. Barely valuing the people they are. That is how I saw them now.
    Erik has been in the USA, chairing a conference. He flies back to see Jenny after her suicide attempt—then stays
    less than a day. Shocked by her actions, disappointed with
    himself in not realizing her pain, and for not knowing what to say now. Concerned for her, yet not enough to let go of his professional commitments. You feel his sense of being unequal to this situation; he has enough of a heart to feel his own helplessness.

    image

    Anna—a strong need to be reassured; the words Jenny
    rehearsed are not enough

    Jenny’s daughter Anna visits too. So much Jenny wants to tell her…but she has never learned how. Jenny believed that telling her the truth about the suicide attempt was the right decision—I don’t disagree. At first, that honesty brings Anna closer to her. But
    honesty brings demands with it. Anna needs reassurance—much more than Jenny realizes, much more than she knows how to give. Her daughter needs her to say, Don’t ever worry about me doing this again.
    Now it is Jenny who is unequal to the situation. Too many
    years building the mask and fitting it perfectly over her face. The mask is the sum of all our little white lies—-definitely not an evil thing but a force that drains our energy and makes us unable to ask for help. You realize suddenly—how would she know she is allowed to ask?
    For so many people like Jenny, life continues on, mostly
    unexamined. But one sudden, traumatic event can stop them
    in their tracks…waking them to a reality they are unprepared for.
    Another theme—one I have not seen in other Bergman movies.
    How we deal with the psychos wandering loose in the
    world—the ones we hear about on the news…that we pray we
    never run into?
    One more news story from years ago, that always stuck with
    me. A retired suburban lady, walking home, murdered by a
    stranger. The man is caught, quietly explains he never
    meant to hurt anyone…only he was so furious at getting
    lost in her town, not knowing the way out. Nothing personal.
    The judge sentences him to life, tells him he is sorry the
    death penalty is outlawed. The killer praises the judge’s insights. Tells him, your honor, right now, if I could get to where you’re sitting, I’d kill you too.

    image

    Monsters worse than childhood nightmares

    Jenny runs into two men like that—in her own house, just
    recently emptied and put on the market for sale. One tries
    to rape her—clearly she is just a piece of meat to him. No
    surprise; she is flooded with memories of her father’s
    abuse.
    Both men were acquaintances of Maria, an inpatient in
    Jenny’s hospital. The two women had spoken, days before.
    Strictly doctor to patient…at least Jenny thought so. Then
    out of nowhere, Maria stared at her. “Poor Jenny,” she said quietly.
    Could Maria read the future? I can’t judge her psychic powers. But possibly, her own pain gave her perceptions into Jenny. Emotions she guesses Jenny experiences but will not admit…that will someday reach the surface. A whole sea of issues not dealt with. Somehow Maria knew.

    image

    Maria

    But what could her intuition tell her about Jenny? It struck
    me—this list feels endless. So much that Maria sees coming; so many possibilities she fears for Jenny. To mention just one: Jenny has heard some of the horrors that Maria has experienced personally. But from a safe distance—she has not lived them since her childhood.
    Jenny is a good person—cares about her patients—wants the best for them. But in most ways she is a child in a mean world—not prepared for the monsters out there. The two waiting at Jenny’s house are the kind of monsters Maria knows to exist…people she knows herself. And when the monsters’ world collides with Jenny’s more refined, more genteel world, Jenny must learn some painful
    lessons. Generally the older you are, the more painful.

    Jenny sees herself as sexually sophisticated. The way she casually tells Tomas, early on, about having an affair. (With a man “not half as nice” as her husband.) But look beneath the surface; you see a woman still feeling the strong grip of the church where she grew up. A conservative Protestant tradition, almost Fundamentalist in its view of sin and guilt.
    Jenny may be an MD, a psychiatrist. But part of her still
    feels the incest and near-rape were her fault. Those gut
    responses die hard. You might have the psychological
    resources to reason with them…it doesn’t matter. You can’t
    expect insights to cancel out old feelings.
    Her nightmares—familiar to Bergman fans, with medieval
    castles and heartless condemnations from merciless
    judges—underline the beliefs Jenny grew up in. Bad girl—a
    big part of her is still expecting that verdict—she never
    left it behind.
    People may be wondering, “Is this guy going to write about anything besides psychology and relationships? Believe me, I’m
    asking myself too, keeping in mind that these are Jenny’s
    world; the search to help her patients—people with
    problems in their minds.
    Hand in hand with that search are other concerns—how can you be there for the people who need you…without being overwhelmed by the pain they have experienced? Jenny gets some unexpected insights from Tomas, the doctor who treats her. He had met Jenny on a social basis—at a party. You feel him struggling hard to hold onto his surface charm, keep up the social graces. Because his own loneliness is eating him up from the
    inside.
    What would have happened socially between them we will never know; Jenny’s suicide attempt turns their relationship to a professional one—Tomas becomes her doctor. Erland Josephson gives a subtle performance, subdued yet devastating; you watch him striving to maintain his professional self while screaming
    in pain at his loneliness. He says little that is dramatic; knows he will be riding a roller coaster with Jenny until they figure some answers…but he keeps those insights to himself. At some
    quiet moments, he lets out secrets—for example, his
    disappointments in losing a relationship with someone he clearly loved deeply.
    Another time, he talks about his commitment to his patients…in
    almost spiritual terms. He mentions “an invocation for us non-believers”—something that struck me as Zen-like. A wish to be fully present in the moment, to feel completely what is in his patients’ hearts, holding nothing back.

    image

    Finding her way back—a long road ahead

    An intense challenge for any of us who feel the darkness pressing in on us, but allowing him to keep his commitments to the people he is treating
    I am hesitant about preaching what psychiatrists “should” or should not do; I am not qualified. But I started remembering a novel I read about 25 years ago; Mount Misery.
    Dr. Basch, a young psychiatrist and the narrator, finds a mentor, Dr. Malik. Like Tomas, he works at giving his patients his
    best. He says to Dr. Basch: “‘Think these people are fragile? Just try ‘n’ change ‘em.
    “But hey, I know you’re scared. I was too.” His eyes locked in again. I felt a kind of rush, a “click”—he was the first person there who had talked to my fear.”
    Soon after, Malik advises him: “’ Listen up:
    all you gotta do to learn here is to keep your eyes open,
    your fly zipped, your feelings up front, and ask for help.
    Don’t read any bullshit articles. Don’t read, do. See. Feel. Do.”
    Most likely you will feel as I did—that Jenny is going back to work way too soon. Yet the invocation Tomas has spoken may be the first step on a path to becoming real, in dropping the smiling
    mask, in asking for help, in really hearing her patients, in gaining their trust. The “crazy” people probably know, better than the normal ones, when someone is reading from a script, when someone cannot work without a script. Perhaps the answer is there, as I feel Tomas and Dr. Malik are saying, in dropping the script, and in the process, becoming real, being real.

  • THE MIST

        The first time I saw The Mist, I was floored…period.  Not by the special effects.  Not by the explanations near the end; clearly they were no more than a throwaway.

        What moved me, really scared me, were the changes in the characters as they boarded themselves up in an average supermarket, watching horrific creatures dead set on killing them. Yeah, the people, way more than the monsters.  The people changed in ways that terrified me, though a few became heroes for sure. Equally scary, you ask yourself too, did some of these people change at all, or were they like this to begin with?

        You see at least six well-drawn characters; you closely watch their reactions and their actions at desperate moments.  Some give way to the hopelessness, to their lack of answers about the terror closing in.  Others discover, get in touch with, courage they didn’t know they had.  Still others give in to their fears, especially one fear; do the people trapped with me, hate me/feel only contempt for me?  

        The Mist starts off as a day like so many others in an average Northeast community on the Maine coast.  The night before, a violent storm with high winds. 

       David Drayton is a graphic artist who did not grow up in this town.  Next morning.  He drives into town for groceries, taking his young son Billy and his neighbor Brent, a respected attorney whose car was totaled by another falling tree.  Earlier, they watched a mist moving across the water near their houses.  

             The mist creeps up on the strip mall; no one can see more than a few feet into it.  The first to make it out of the mist screams, “Something in the mist!” his eyes wide. 

        Quickly, some of the tension between townspeople comes to the surface.  Jim, a machinist and handyman, dislikes David from the beginning—and feels David is talking down to him.  Jim won’t take any shit from an out-of-towner who went to college.  

        Brent, David’s neighbor, an Afro-American, is still simmering over a civil suit with people in town.  He senses that people like Jim have been lying in wait for him ever since…and he’s not all wrong.  Jim is tired of keeping his feelings to himself—it shows.  Ironically Brent and Jim have something in common.  They feel David is telling them what to do…trying to push them around.  David’s not military…or a police officer.  No way they’re taking orders from him.

        When night falls, huge insects begin slamming against the front window.  When larger creatures break holes in the glass, the store is invaded; people start dying. 

        Mrs. Carmody, perhaps the most compelling character out of many compelling characters, watches with the same terror as the others.  It’s where she goes with her terror that makes her riveting.  She is known around town for emotional problems she never addressed.  And for her hellfire and damnation outlook, the logical outcome of her belief in a cruel, jealous god.

        If her plan had been to lead a revolution, what happens would not be as scary.  She wasn’t born evil, she is no “bad seed.”

        Mrs. Carmody actually does some lengthy soul-searching; speaks to God.  I saw a lot of similarities between her searching and Hitler’s long search during the years before and after World War I.  Mrs. Carmody’s ideas are almost all based on the bible. 

        You may have expected a serene reaction from Mrs. Carmody when the terror begins; she had expected something like this a long time, god’s final judgment.  But her ego seems to overcome that calm; she intuits she must redeem herself before the destruction is complete.     You watch her sitting on the bathroom floor…quietly waiting for god to speak.  When a woman asks to use the bathroom, Mrs. Carmody is incensed.  Partly that she sees the woman’s offer to help her as mocking her.  But I saw something else.  Mrs. Carmody may have pictured herself walking with god…something like Jesus walking in the desert.  Then suddenly, she sees herself as only a woman in a bathroom.

        But scarier still, people begin flocking to her.  It makes sense.  Monsters are outside, trying to break the window and fly in.  People are desperate for answers…and for somebody to blame.  This woman believes she has answers.

       Another revelation.  Insects the size of hawks invade the store.  One lands on Mrs. Carmody.  She remains still, speaking a long quiet prayer.  Then—it flies off; it draws no blood.  Likely Mrs. Carmody sees it as a sign, that she was chosen to lead her people.

        In 1930’s Germany, many fatally underestimated Hitler.  One intellectual at the time said Hitler had no substance; he was only the noise he made.  We know now how wrong this man was.  

         In The Mist, more than half the people inside the store wind up firmly behind Mrs. Carmody, and her end-of-days prophecies.  Even when she tells the gathering they need to make a sacrifice for god—David’s young son Billy.

        Jim’s (the character who challenged David) changes give you a lot of insight into this woman’s disciples.  Early on, he presents himself as salt of the earth, one of the unheralded guys in the trenches.  He sees David, a graphic artist, as an ivory-tower wuss; someone you can’t count on when things get rough.

        But Jim is stunned into inaction time and again, by tentacles, by huge insects, and most of all by the monster spiders in the pharmacy next door.  He watches David, the college boy, lead the action, put himself in harm’s way again and again.  Jim looks as though his courage has failed him…he is nothing. For a while, he appears unhinged, helpless.  Then he drifts over to Mrs. Carmody’s disciples and finds his courage.  He becomes one of her enforcers.  He has a purpose, a mission now.  No reason to think, to search for rational explanations.  Now he has a leader who can make his decisions for him.

        A year or so after The Mist was released, the USA took a chance.  They elected a black president.  Eight years after that, many people felt that our country needed desperate measures to solve our problems.  Their patience had worn out with leaders saying things were evolving in the right direction.  Then, in 2016 you had a candidate saying things were fucked; that certain people were responsible and it was time we put the searchlights on them.  Sadder still, many of those voters still feel they chose the right candidate for the job.

  • NEVER LET ME GO

         People forced to live lives in shadowy fog.  Their curiosity gnawing at them but their indoctrination still catching hold: don’t ask too many questions.  We will tell you all you need to know…in our own time.  Till then, keep your fucking mouth shut.

         They have gotten messages like that since they were young kids.  That in itself makes it harder to disobey…especially when “disobey” covers so broad a spectrum.  Three main characters: the narrator, Kathy H,  Ruth and Tommy.  More restless than out-and-out rebellious.  Almost resigned to their fate.  But unable to stop questioning their reality—so many unanswered questions.

         Never let me Go takes its time to reveal…just some of the questions.  II’s set in an alternate reality, but so much will feel familiar compared to our own..      

         Many diseases we fear (in our own reality) have been eliminated.  Longevity has increased to well over 100.  But the price of these medical breakthroughs is a steep one.  Young people raised as a sort of sacrificial lamb—donors of organs needed for medical research.  These donations will kill most of them before the age of 30. 

         Ironically, the people in charge have not lied to the young people raised as sacrificial lambs.  The lambs are doing a good job.  Disease numbers are way down, and likely to continue that way.

         But Never let me Go does not deal with statistics.  It wants to focus on the people whose lives are already mapped ou†.  Paying the price for people who can now be cured from diseases which were once killer diseases.

         This movie is based on a novel by Kazuo Ishiguro, writer of the superb The Remains of the Day.  It’s not in the same league as that movie, but that is no condemnation—only a handful are.  

         Many people have Never let me Go listed as one of their all-time  best horror movies.  Does it belong there?  Well it doesn’t have any scenes that make you jump, or pull back from blood being spilled.  And yet things about it will keep gnawing at you…the fate of the main characters being the first.  Yes, they have choices they can make.  But virtually all of their choices lead to the same place in the maze—early death with no escape, no one to hear any appeal you can summon up.

         It starts out like a sensitive-kids-coming-of-age story: vulnerable kids trapped in a quiet but deceptively doomed environment.  A prison they gradually realize has numbed their spirits.  Hailsham, the upscale school where the kids have grown up, does have some unexpected kindnesses.  Sympathetic staff people who sometime listen to students’ concerns.  

         But major questions stay unanswered—who are we, what exactly are we doing here, what is our destination, regardless of whether we are carers or donors. Hailsham pupils are deliberately left in the dark.  

         I mentioned “sensitive kids coming of age story” because this is where the movie spends most of its time….getting to know Kathy, Ruth and Tommy.  We see Kathy—generous to a fault, watching Tommy and Ruth bonding while Kathy stays painfully alone.  We share Kathy and Tommy’s pain when they re-unite after a long separation. Only to learn they will only be allowed weeks together at most.  

         Gradually the theme of sensitive kids growing up is overshadowed by that of their inevitable fate.  The future of the carers is not made as clear as that of the donors.  

         Gradually the donors start to understand—few of them will survive past thirty.  They will miss out on a major part of average people’s lives.  Years that so many of us take for granted, or complain about instead of stopping to appreciate them  

         Falling in love.  Seeing their kids born.  Watching them grow up.  Experiencing our careers develop, grow.  Many of us won’t appreciate those years—we are pre-occupied with buying more things and keeping up with credit card paymentsBut some of us —the fortunate ones, may grow old and eventually treasure those times.

          Think of the many movies showing us how painful is the yearning to live through exactly those years.  Frankenstein, Bride of Frankenstein.   A surprisingly large number.of werewolf stories and even a few vampire tales—the pain of missing out on those times.

    That makes the sting so much more painful. Kathy and Tommy believe they’ve discovered an escape clause; they can find the time to experience their newfound love.  

         They find out the hard truth.  Kathy maintains her good manners and accepts her reality with grace.  Tommy stands in an empty road and screams in agony.  The movie has shown us just enough of their brief happiness together to feel what Tommy feels. 

  • THE PREMONITION

    Note—-Not to be confused with the 2007 movie The Premonition starring Sandra Bullock or a 1972 movie of the same title written and directed by Alan Rudolph

         The small-town Deep South, the mid-’70’s.  A beautiful young woman gets off a bus near a traveling carnival.  A man from the carnival, dressed as a mime/clown, clearly glad to see her.  The woman glad to see him, but she’s got other things on her mind.  “Have you seen her?” she asks him right away.  She asks to borrow his SUV; he says yes.

         The Premonition is a movie about people searching for love, but few of them able to find it.  You watch them and learn; most of them are too fragile, too damaged to give love, despite how much they want to.  They dream of a love that can save them.  Maybe it can but  it is out of reach.

         The mime, Jude, believes he loves this mysterious woman Andrea.  They knew each other in an institution/mental hospital; both are released now.  Andrea is obsessed with starting life again with her daughter Janie, who was taken from her and given for adoption.  After she borrows Jude’s SUV her first drive is to Janie’s school to see if her daughter remembers her.

         You may recall an obscure Stones song, Out of Time. 

    “You don’t know what’s going on/

    You’ve been away for far too long/

    You can’t come back and think you are still there” 

         But the movie does show the other side of the coin: Janie’s adopted parents, Sheri and Miles.  Sheri tends toward the hypersensitive but her love for Janie is strong.  

         Despite losing two previous babies in infancy, Sheri is able to love unwaveringly.  Her husband—an academic— is preoccupied with his job and with other women.  But he is clearly open to new ideas and willing to reach for new solutions to get his daughter back when things later turn desperate.

         And Miles’ faculty colleague Dr. Kingsley has learned how to “think outside the box” in reference to psychic phenomena and how to apply it to unique situations; Andrea may be alive or dead but either way her obsession with Janie threatens the little girl’s life.

         Jude the mime may be the saddest character.  Hopelessly In love with  Andrea but just able to see how fragile is her grasp on reality.  The two of them go to Janie’s house to kidnap her.  But Andrea grabs Janie’s doll, lying right next to Janie.   Andrea continues talking to the doll as if she were a real girl; Something has changed this woman in her hospital commitment; something has been cut out of her.  

         You may recall Wesley in I Walked with a Zombie.  Drunk every day, in love with Jessica, who has lost her mind, most likely her soul, to the high fever that almost killed her.  Jude has a good heart but nearly no capacity to love; watch the scene where he tries to reach out to Janie.  

         Richard Lynch (God Told me to, The Sword and the Sorcerer, Scarecrow) was a much under-rated actor, limited mostly to blackhearted villain or psycho roles.  Jude is much more complex and Lynch makes the most of his part.  This is a quiet subtle movie without much melodrama and violence.  See it anyway.   

  • KURENEKO

         Most of us feel we were brought up upholding certain responsibilities—to forces we’ve been born into.  So many ways to state what these are:

          Defending/Fighting for our country, our community.  

          But we find ourselves bound to another set of vows: 

          Promises to our family, our religion/our spiritual codes.

         Occasionally we experience a stark conflict between the two.  We Just struggle to reach a decision in reconciling this stark conflict.  In Kureneko we find three people trying to find answers between such opposing forces.  

         One sad irony.  Kuroneko is set in Japan, centuries ago.  But it was released in 1968 when such conflicts were tearing our country apart like never before.  The words “Vietnam Era” will bring back brutal memories to many in the baby boomer generation. They faced such conflicts then, splitting their consciousness.

         In the years Kureneko is set, Japanese nobility was in desperate need of someone to protect them, to fight for them.  Warriors called samurai filled that need.  But eventually the samurai’s power grew stronger than the nobilities’. The samurai felt that they were the rulers now—unstoppable.  “It’s a samurai’s world now”, one of them says, without any doubt in his voice.  

         Kureneko sets up its conflict between samurai and a farm family just managing to keep itself alive in wartime.  Near a house, samurai emerging from a forest like a swarm of army ants.  With barely a word, they devour food, then rape and kill a middle aged woman and her daughter in law.  They burn the house to the ground then leave in silence.  

         The two women lie dead in the smoking ruins.  But the silence is broken by the quiet sounds of a cat.  It stops to lick the faces of the dead women.

         Soon after, samurai begin to die.  Killed by ghostly women spirits who float, more than walk, in dense forest, asking protection from the samurai…then murdering them, then drinking their blood.  The killings done in the dark woods, occasionally in a small house deep in forest.  The samurai polite, expecting only a short respite from their soldiering for more raping, more murdering.  The last thing the samurai see before dying—a woman’s arm and hand transformed into a cat’s leg and claw.

         The samurai leader calls out for the strongest, bravest hero to stop the murders.  An abrupt shift in tone from the early, subtle scenes; from darkness to something closer to a 1960’s Bible epic.  These scenes feel wider in scope, the sunlight far brighter, the voices much louder, more abrupt.  You can almost hear it translated into modern English, soldiers answering their U.S. Marine commander—“Sir, yes sir!”  Gintoki, the samurai chosen to protect his comrades…carries around the head of his last opponent.  Not the man anyone wants to fuck with.

         Up till now, Kureneko feels like two different movies.  But here begins the third, where the two worlds start to collide: soldiers’ world and supernatural (ghosts’) world.  What will Gintoki’s fate be when he enters the realm of the ghosts?  

         At first, things go the way you expect.  Gintoki on his horse in a dark forest, sees a woman walking ahead of him.  He tells her she is about to enter a dark grove. But he offers his protection.  She accepts; they reach a house and go inside.  

         So far, all the conversations between the women and the samurai have been set-ups—for inevitable killings.  No killing this time.  The two women and the samurai circle each other like feral cats.  The man draws his sword, the women appear to vaporize, then re-appear outside.  The samurai, unable to see them again. 

         And so it begins.  Irony piled upon irony.  Gintoki, a farmer till recently, now an accomplished killer.  Two women, one previously Gintoki’s mother, one previously his wife…now sworn to kill.  

         The women’s lives before, trapped, victims.  Now they have made some mysterious pact with a supernatural  force, empowering them to commit violent revenge against samurai.  

         Yet Gintoki and the female spirits—bound to their past. Struggling to get past their previous roles, yet committed to more killing. 

  • GLORIOUS

    An everyday guy…locked inside a men’s room at a rest stop off a highway.  A voice telling him he is the one who’s imprisoned him.  And who demands a heavy price to set him free.  The main character, Wes is no pushover.  He’s not about to take anyone’s disembodied voice for granted, especially a voice who claims to have god-like powers.  Even someone’s voice who seems able to back up his claims, at least some of them.

         After a while we realize—this story is about Wes’ redemption.  And redemption, any kind, is something most of us can relate to.  It’s a theme that draws us in. 

         From this description, Glorious may sound like a movie working (or maybe not working) on several different levels.  My strategy was this: try to keep myself free, enough to jump back and forth between the levels I saw.  Admittedly not easy with things going so fast.    

         Wes’ girlfriend Brenda died recently.   But her death was not a highway accident, DUI or an incurable illness.  Wes had much to do with it—he broke her heart.  Try as he will to deny it, he hurt Brenda.

         In a movie full of possible symbols, Brenda might represent the faith Wes destroyed.        

         Or, she might represent someone able to sense anyone’s redemption.  This might explain Wes’ agony when we first see him, as he drives, hoping to die.

         You can anticipate a viewer’s impatience, even contempt for a story setting its sights so high.  A big theme is the fate of the universe—will it survive the next 24 hours. The voice says he (the voice) may have the means to save the universe, but only with Wes’ help. But the universe’s fate being determined in a men’s room with a floor covered with puke?  Pretentious?  You bet.  

         You can imagine ratings of 1/2* or 1* out of 5* and I can understand where people could rate Glorious that low.  I could argue—give Glorious serious credit for presenting some profound questions without blinking.  In a men’s bathroom no less.  (I was surprised Glorious received much better reviews than I had expected from imdb and from Rotten Tomatoes.) 

         The question—with things coming at you fast and furious; will you be intrigued enough to stick with this?  

         You may start off expecting some kind of mind games—a duel between Wes and the voice he’s hearing.  A quietly menacing voice slightly reminiscent of HAL, the computer in 2001.

         But this isn’t a movie about sick mind games.  The voice has a name—a long mysterious name with a mnemonic: “ghat.”  Ghat needs something from Wes…Wes needs to understand what he is expected to accomplish and why.  

         And ghat’s messages for Wes: Wes must redeem himself.  But first he must experience the pain he caused Brenda. Another courageous decision in this movie.  Asking you to identify with Brenda’s feeling of betrayal instead of presenting her as a woman with problems: “who loves too much,” or “loves guys who won’t love her back.”

         Wes can’t get around this.  “Her memory has to be worth something,” he reflects.  And it will be the worst pain he ever experienced.  Ghat can talk all he wants about saving the universe but Wes’ ordeal will be equally painful.

         Slowly but surely Glorious pulls us into Wes’ journey towards redemption.  What pain must he endure?  Do we know  him well enough to care?  Can we accept ghat’s word for it—that  Wes’ redemption in Brenda’s suicide  is chained to the fate of the universe?

         Wes can’t get around this.  “Her memory has to be worth something,” he reflects.  And it will be the worst pain he ever experienced.  Ghat can talk all he wants about saving the universe but Wes’ ordeal will be equally painful.

         Slowly but surely Glorious pulls us into Wes’ journey towards redemption.  What pain must he endure?  Do we know him well enough to care?  Can we accept ghat’s word for it—that  Wes’ redemption in Brenda’s suicide  is c. Slowly but surely Glorious pulls us into Wes’ journey towards redemption.  What pain must he endure?  Do we know him well enough to care?  Can we accept ghat’s word for it—that  Wes’ redemption in Brenda’s suicide  is chained to the fate of the universe?

         I can’t answer that question for each of us.  Give yourself a chance to answer.

  •          SLEEPY HOLLOW

         I can’t say enough good things about Sleepy Hollow.  And I only hope I can express how much I loved it…when I first saw it 25 years ago, and again this year.  This movie has something for everyone: horror, detective mystery, a great love story, and Young Adult horror/fantasy..

         It’s loosely (very loosely) based on one of the oldest known works of American fiction, The Legend of Sleepy Hollow (1820)written by Washington Irving.  The best known adaptation till then was a Disney animated feature.  Another adaptation was actually a made-for-TV movie starring Jeff Goldblum and Dick Butkus.  

         Its director Tim Burton was on a hot streak around that time and got a lot of freedom to do as he wanted.  Burton had a vision and was able to capture a lot of that vision.  That included a wonderful cast including the great Johnny Depp, Christina Ricci and several horror movie veterans you will probably recognize.

         Burton used some subtle touches too: the views of the river upstate; like a painting from the Hudson River School, but with all of its primary colors drained away.  The drawing room of the inn where Ichabod meets the town elders. Their faces—grotesque but grotesque in a way you can’t quite put your finger on.  Other things you can’t help but notice, the dark gloomy grey color enveloping the town of Sleepy Hollow.

         Johnny Depp plays Ichabod Crane, a  New York City police constable sent to solve a series of murders in an upstate town…all the victims beheaded by a phantom with a sword.  No clue where the heads wound up. 

    The city police force are glad to get rid of Ichabod.  They despise his preference for “scientific” detective methods, his refusal to torture confessions out of suspects.  The people holding the power in Sleepy Hollow appear willing to tolerate Ichabod—for a short stretch anyway.  They are that desperate to stop the killings. But they don’t hesitate to tell him, you’re long way from home, son. 

         Ichabod arrives just in time for a party at the one big inn in town.  The guests in the midst of a game of pickety-witch; a woman designated “the witch” blindfolded, trying to guess the man who has just kissed her.  She is Katrina Van Tassel, the innkeeper’s daughter.  You can sense the chemistry between Katrina and Ichabod; so thick you can cut it with a knife.  

         But you can feel the distance separating Katrina and Ichabod too.  Sleepy Hollow is a tight-knit community; just a few families closely intertwined…almost inbred.  Anyone else is treated as an outsider and must pass rigorous tests before being accepted.  It won’t be long till you sense the dirty secrets in town history…and Katrina’s family is a part of those secrets. 

         Before the end of the next day, things change—quickly and dramatically.  Ichabod, who believes in scientific methods, not superstition, sees the horseman for himself.  At first, the sight overwhelms him; a supernatural creature he’s always insisted would not, cannot exist.  Immobile in bed, he lies, shaking, while townspeople stare at him, “Well I guess it’s back to the city then,” someone blurts out.   You can understand their impression.  Ichabod can barely ride a horse.  He has a phobia of insects and spiders.  All in all, not a tough guy.

         But Ichabod finds his courage the next day.  He may not believe in witches but he meets one in the flesh.  And he is able to discover some of what he needs to know.  It’s a brilliant scene, combining humor with some visceral terror.  A tightrope-walking feat that scenes like this seldom achieve.   Even some elements of the original Psycho where Lila Crane (Vera Miles) encounters Norman Bates’ terrible mother and his mother’s worst secrets.  

         Humor too—Ichabod is so agitated he uses the word “which” three times in a matter of seconds.  The witch’s whole face is covered with shaggy grey hair.  When he finally sees her face it is a nightmare-ish vision.  But like Norman’s mother the witch supplies a major clue in Ichabod’s search.

         In addition you watch a different sort of clue; Katrina and Ichabod’s growing chemistry.  Riding away from the witch’s cave, Ichabod faces a stranger—face covered by a hood.  To his astonishment he sees Katrina.  What are you doing here, he asks.

         None of the men in town were willing to come here, Katrina says.

         Then I am twice the man, Ichabod says…Subtle but powerful partnership.  And not the last time.

         I don’t want to give away any more of the story line.  The story has way more twists and turns—more than you can keep track of.  Even Ichabod has some childhood memories he wants to forget…but memories he needs to deal with in the here and now. 

         The world where Ichabod finds himself cannot be dealt with entirely with science and reason.  He has to use some methods he had thought to be supernatural, borderline-magic.  Watching him combine the scientific and magical methods, you can see how much he grows.  You’ll want to take that journey with him.

  •                 Kill Baby Kill

        

         Some people have trouble resisting any movie they are told was ever banned.  Even if they know the reason in advance and they doubt it’s  justified.  I admit to being one of those curious people.  My curiosity about Kill Baby Kill got the better of me. Even though I knew the general argument for banning it—the theme of revenge but the avenger being a little girl, ten or younger.  Not long after, this movie would be overshadowed by at least two others: Night the Living Dead and The Exorcist.  Little girls doing some major violenceThen what did the censors find so unacceptable about Kill Baby Kill?

         Melissa, the avenging angel in this movie is actually fairly bland.  No satanic expressions on her face.  No demonic voices.  No dire threats.  (“The sow is mine.”).  But we do know she is seeking revenge…probably she is justified.  And others have died in the neglected, backward village where she lived all her life.

         The movie has more than its share of weaknesses.  Bad dubbing from Italian into English.  Generally shallow characters.  Acting—average at best.  A plot that’s nothing new—apart from Melissa.

         Then what are the movie’s strong points?  (Keep in mind, it has more than its share of admirers.)  Atmosphere—an overall sense of an isolated village with its mysteries well hidden.  Well guarded against strangers.  People determined to keep their secrets to themselves.  An overall sense—sickness, a cancer that needs to be cut out.  But a strong resistance to permitting anyone to do it.

         A physician, Dr. Eswai, arrives in the village on a bright day, in broad daylight.  Still, the coach driver refuses to come close to the main street.  Inside the inn, hostile looks, silence.  As though a stranger can only make life worse for them.  Karl, the burgomeister is the only one in town willing to speak to Dr. Eswai.

         Irena, a village woman has died recently, falling from a balcony onto a row of metal spikes.  Besides Eswai, a government inspector is in town to investigate Irena’s death.  Villagers, the few willing to speak, have suggested to the inspector and to the doctor that the solution lies within the villa Graps—a huge mansion dwarfing the town.  But they warn the outsiders—never go inside…for any reason.  Dr. Eswai suspects the inspector has gone there…and may be already dead.

         An unwavering materialist, Dr. Eswai has no fear of ghosts and avenging spirits.  He walks through an open door into the huge, ominous villa.  The atmosphere he finds inside is one of the movie’s strong points…maybe the strongest. 

    Cobwebs, everywhere he looks, obscuring portraits and mounted animals and birds, straight out of Norman Bates’ office in Psycho.  And the size of each room, dwarfing the doctor, who is a tall man himself.  Hard to believe he will ever find his way out.  A spiral staircase, narrow but seemingly endless.  Bright blue and red colors.  Many believe the blues and reds were an inspiration for the ways Dario Argento colored his masterpiece Suspiria.  I find that hard to dispute; just watch Argento’s movie for yourself.  

         Dr. Eswai is not an exciting character yet he is someone you respect for keeping up his search for Melissa, her reputed curse and a way to finally end it.  He finds a long string of secrets and plot twists inside the villa.  As bland as he may be, you have to admire him for his determination to solve the mysteries.  So many characters have long-buried secrets.  As I stated, you experience the secrets as cancers that need to be cut out.  None of the people are evil people.  But their quests for vengeance have corrupted them.  Both the baroness Graps and Melissa have suffered wrongs that explain their parts in the larger tale you watch unfold.  Try to follow each character carefully and unravel their part in this tragic story.

         In the 70’s, the great success of The Exorcist opened the floodgates for possessed and evil children in horror films.  People now will probably look at Kill Baby Kill as a historical relic—-a symbol of big changes to come.  For better or worse, just read a list of 70’s releases; you can’t miss it.

  • THE THING (1982)

        Many people know how this movie was overshadowed by the incredibly popular E.T. when it first came out.  It was a box-office bomb for Universal Pictures.  But gradually its reputation spread by word of mouth, until, about twenty-five years later, many people rate it among the best horror movies ever.  I definitely
    would not go that far, but The Thing definitely packs a punch to the gut.

         I remember how disappointed I was with this movie the first time I saw it. I can recall what Ithought was missing in The Thing.  What I wanted to know about was the terrible change from being human to becoming  the ultimate alien monster; do you feel
    horrified, ecstatic, or perhaps a rush roughly like adrenaline but more intense, as you sense your new powers.

        Watching this movie now, I still would lovesome answers to my questions.  But I don’t think the filmmakers had this in mind.  It definitely did not come up during the Commentary included in
    the deluxe DVD with John Carpenter and Kurt Russell. They
    focused squarely on other issues.

        First, how does a group of people not trained for war react when suddenly face to face with an enemy different from anything that people have ever fought?  Second, how do they cope with the
    sudden paranoia when they’re surrounded by people in a closed
    space, and some of them could be already infected by the Thing?

       Questions about exactly how  and when the infected people got infected go unanswered.  Many plot threads are left dangling at the end.   But then again, that’s not what this movie focuses on.

        What you get instead are the desperate strategies these new recruits try to use, when suddenly threatened with a life-form capable of taking over the whole planet.  (In just over three years,
    according to Blair’s computer.)  And the added desperation of knowing that any of the people around them could already have been taken over by this life-force.  This is the focus of The Thing, not any deep philosophical questions.

        The Thing begins in the brightest of daylight with one unanswered question.  Why are these Norwegian researchers risking their own lives, and those of the Americans, to kill a dog?  The Norwegians seem hysterical with panic, but why?  When one of them injures a member of the Americans to get to the dog, he is immediately shot dead.  Zero chance for explanations.

        One of the M.D.’s, Copper, and the helicopter pilot MacCready fly to the Norwegian base to investigate.  The clues they find suggest something horrible but impossible to pin down.  Every
    building burned.  A bloody axe buried in a wooden door.  A man sitting, now frozen, his wrists and throat slashed with a straight razor.  Strangest of all, the body of a distorted man, combined with some other lifeform, frozen in the snow just outside the
    buildings.  The face contorted, seemingly stretched into two distinct halves, facing slightly different directions.

    image

    MacCready finds a Norwegian dead, an apparent suicide…no
    explanation

          MacCready and Copper fly the frozen body back to base.  It is dissected but its internal organs appear normal.

       Each man on the base does his best to resume life as
    usual.  Bennings, the man shot in the leg, hopes that a
    card game will relax his nerves.  A dog, the same one the
    Norwegians tried to kill, brushes against him, making him
    jump.  This dog has been wandering the rooms and passageways
    of the base all day, with everyone’s mind on other things. Bennings asks Clark, the man responsible for the dogs, to put this one in the pen with the others.

        The dog hesitates at first, then enters the pen and lies down, not sure what the others will do.

        You can’t tell how the pack will figure out who’s now the dominant dog.  Whether dominance can be established without a
    fight.  The other dogs make threatening signs.  Can this battle be settled without bloodshed?

        Suddenly this question is shoved aside for all time, as the conflict changes into something worse than most nightmares.  Personally I cannot recall ever having a nightmare as bad as this.

        The dog’s fur and skin rip apart.  From this mass of naked muscle, legs tear themselves free, spider-likelegs, but from a spider as big as the dog.  Unearthly shrieks come from the mass of flesh and contorting legs. Venomous-looking liquid shoots out of somewhere in this formless creature, covering one of the dogs while structures looking like tentacles strangle it.

    image

    The dog–starting to change

    Congratulations.  You’ve just witnessed the best special effects in movie history, the first of several in The Thing.  Someday someone will accomplish more, using CGI, but this is still the champion for right now, over 45 years and counting.

        The camp’s other M.D. Dr. Blair, and MacCready,the chopper pilot, are starting to get the big picture now and it is plenty ugly.  What they are dealing with is an extra-terrestrial form of life with the ability to change\ itself into a perfect replica of another form of life.  It can copy one of the humans as easily as it can one of the
    dogs.  Blair becomes obsessed with cutting off all the Thing’s possible escape routes, shooting the rest of the dogs, and destroying the helicopter, tractor, and the computer system.

        MacCready appears less educated than the others, but he is the most intelligent, resourceful,and courageous.  In addition, he is an excellent detective, taking clues and quickly using them to
    gain insight.  Along with Blair, he is the first to feel the coming wave of paranoia that will soon sweep the others:  Given its capabilities to mold itself, any one of them could be harboring the Thing.

        You can sense the paranoia after Dr. Copper thinks of a way to identify the Thing using refrigerated blood kept for emergencies.  But the crew finds the entire blood supply is gone.  Accusations
    and counter-accusations fly. The intense fear is masked with
    an anger, genuine fury, probably the crew’s best defense against panic.

    image

    MacCready: “Trust’s a hard thing to come by these days.”

         A new blood test is devised, but order is on the verge of crumbling.  Garry, the only man with a key to the blood supply has become a prime suspect.  Other major suspects: Dr. Copper, who often gets access to  blood, and Clark, due to the long stretches of time he spends with the dogs.  Blair, the man with the deepest insights into the Thing’s biology, is kept prisoner after his spree of
    destruction.  Garry is deeply offended about being accused, and refuses to be leader any more.  MacCready, with his courage and decisive nature takes charge; he is all that stands between the crew and chaos.

        The new blood test is given.  Without giving too much away, leave it at this:  All the guesses as to the Thing’s identity (to be fair, all were backed up with some logic) turn out to be dead wrong.  In a few scenes,which match the dog-transformation scene in their power, the Thingis brought out of hiding, in ways that are as imaginative as they are horrific.  To repeat one of the most quoted lines in The Thing, one astonished crew member
    stares at a new lifeform the Thing created, saying “You gotta be fucking kidding.”

        The death toll mounts, but no one can say which of the survivors has become the Thing’s latest replicated form of life.  Scariest of all is MacCready’s idea, probably sound thinking: The Thing will be happy to go to sleep in the intense cold and wait until spring to revive itself. He sees only one answer, and it means sacrificing all who have survived this far, “We’re going to have to warm things up around here.”

        Plenty of plot threads are left hanging What was the deal with the torn-up uniforms?  Who turned on the light in MacCready’s shack?  Whatever happened to Nauls?  Just forget these details for now. This movie finally puts to rest, the man in the monster suit with the zipper down the back.

        Listen to the Commentary, and appreciate how much the technical advances meant to the filmmakers’ sense of creativity.  As much as we all loved E.T. we can now appreciate how alien a form of life from another solar system might be.  Especially a form of life with the intention of re-populating our planet.

        I can’t say enough good things about Rob Bottin’s special effects.  We are all less fortunate for the limited amount of work he has done since, after reportedly burning out to keep up with finishing this movie.  The music by Ennio Morricone (The Good the Bad and the Ugly) is chilling, with two notes, like sinister heartbeats repeating again and again, building the tension.  Kurt
    Russell (MacCready) has never been better.  The rest of the cast, mostly familiar as character actors, are excellent as well.

    The Thing begins with some rather conventional flying-saucer effects.  What comes next is anything but conventional.  Forget the loose ends in the plot.  This is one movie that will grab you and not let go.

  • FRANKENSTEIN MUST BE DESTROYED

        Frankenstein Must be Destroyed was the next-to-last appearance of Peter Cushing as Baron Frankenstein.  This movie does have its faults. Probably the most serious; you have virtually no reason to sympathize with the baron anymore.  He is almost
    overwhelmingly evil.

    But after an undistinguished first half, things change radically.  The movie takes a devastating detour, turning into a bizarre, tragic love story, as powerful as it is unexpected.  You suddenly find yourself in a different tale.  Not the baron’s anymore, but that of Dr. Brandt and his wife Ella.

    Imagine being  light-years away from the person you
    loved most.  Then years later, you are back in the same
    house, close enough to watch them sleep.  Yet you know this
    is as close to them as you can ever get.

    Many reasons for this.  But the strongest
    one: you really aren’t you anymore.  It is a
    startling idea, especially in a movie made in the late
    ‘60’s.

    Much of the story up till then has gone in a
    different direction.  You watch the baron, feeling regret,
    but much more, feeling disgust.   His positive feelings
    have been bled out of him.  He does violence without
    regret.

    As the movie opens, a well-dressed man walks down a street.  Suddenly another figure emerges from the shadows, a scythe in his hand.  In one stroke, he slices off the first man’s head, and calmly places it into a box he brought for this purpose.  This is your re- introduction to the new, savagely embittered Baron  Frankenstein.

    How has he become so cruel, so lacking in feeling?  Without excusing him, the movie gives you an explanation.

    The baron sees himself as a man of vision, someone able to
    see past the limits of the scientific establishment. For years, he has waited, relishing his opportunity to show them his greatness and their small-mindedness.

    But despite his brilliance and imagination, he has seen frustration after frustration.  Is it God, or fate, or luck, or karma or Murphy’s Law?  The baron, a materialist through and through, is only sure it is not God… because God does not exist.   He is
    only sure of his ever-growing fury and ruthlessness, as though he is at war with the Universe.

    Baron Frankenstein tries to start fresh in a new town with a new identity, Mr. Fenner.  (He is careful not to call himself “Doctor.”)     In no time, his beautiful landlady, Anna, and her fiancé, Dr. Karl Holst, have become his blackmail victims.  (Anna’s mother lives in an expensive hospice, and Karl has been stealing cocaine from the medical facility and selling it, to pay for her stay.)

    The Baron does not need their help for a new creation.  He has something more urgent in mind. It turns out that the Baron’s former research colleague, Dr. Brandt is an inmate at the hospital for the insane where Karl works.

    It is Dr. Brandt’s help that the Baron needs. Brandt has made progress where the Baron was unsuccessful. Baron Frankenstein is obsessed with finding out Brandt’s discoveries.

    However the medical staff is sure that Brandt is unreachable.  His devoted wife Ella continues to visit him, never giving up hope that he will recover. He shows no response to her.  To the doctors,
    he alternates between long stretches of total apathy and short bursts of  violence.

    Yet the baron believes he can cure Brandt’s insanity.  He can see only one way to solve this problem. Brandt must literally be kidnapped out of the hospital. With Karl’s help the baron is able
    to do this.  Amazingly, he is also able to cure Brandt’s insanity through surgery.  image

    The surgery transferring Brandt’s brain turns out to be the
    easy part 

    But fate continues to plague Baron Frankenstein.  In getting free, Brandt has suffered a heart attack.  The baron knows Brandt has only days to live. Frankenstein’s solution is grim but simple; he kills a respected surgeon, Dr. Richter, and places Brandt’s brain
    in Richter’s body.

    Again his gift for surgery serves the baron well.  And again fate betrays him; Brandt’s wife sees Frankenstein on the street, and believing she recognizes him, follows him home.

    The baron greets her warmly, and deceives her with a brilliant mix of truth, lies, and omissions.  He admits he is Frankenstein, and explains that kidnapping her husband was necessary  to restore his sanity.  Then he tells her she may see her husband, though she may have trouble recognizing him, covered with bandages.  Doing this allows him not to tell her that her husband’s brain is now in Richter’s body.

    Unable to speak yet, Brandt is able to communicate with hand movements.  In addition, he recognizes his wife’s voice and can tell her this. The baron’s plan is working to perfection.  He convinces Mrs. Brandt that her husband needs rest.   But she is welcome anytime to see him.  The minute she is gone, he turns to
    Karl and says, “Pack.  We’re leaving.”

    Frankenstein, Karl, Anna and Dr. Brandt (in Dr. Richter’s body) find refuge in a deserted estate.  In the next few minutes you start to realize: this is not Frankenstein’s story anymore.  It is Brandt’s story now; his desperate try at returning home, in every sense of the word.

    Perhaps Brandt realizes right away that he and his wife can never regain what they have lost. He has access to all his former consciousness, but the wrong body; the old one is dead.  His wife will only see him as another face, hear him as another voice.

    And if she could ever accept him this way, it is too late now.   She has been shocked, traumatized too many times.  Already she has lived through his plunge into insanity, followed by years in the hospital. Years he was unable to even give her a smile of recognition.  The kidnapping.  Her joy at the baron telling her, her husband has returned and is sane now.  Then both her husband and the baron disappearing.

    And the final stab, the police showing her, her dead husband’s body. A brilliant, resourceful man, Brandt must realize too that Baron Frankenstein will never leave them in peace again.The baron is a force of nature, dead set on finding out Brandt’s conclusions.  At the risk of stretching things a little, Frankenstein reminds me of Hannibal Lecter—he never stops coming at you.

    Brandt escapes from the baron and heads straighthome.  Already he can sense just how poor the odds are
    that he and his wife can start a second life together.  Life
    has hurt her too much for her to accept him.  Second,
    Frankenstein will stop at nothing to get to his (Brandt’s)
    research conclusions. The baron would even kill Ella; her
    life means nothing to him.

    Brandt gets home.  He knows how much he needs to
    do before Frankenstein gets there.  Time is precious beyond belief.  He yearns to speak to Ella after so long.
    Yet he realizes full well how difficult it will be; to explain all that’s happened.  The music is poignant as he stands there a moment, watching her as she sleeps, but afraid to wake her.

    The best he can do is leave her a note, hope she reads it next morning, and speak to her then.

    Next day he is there when she wakes. Ella reacts with even more pain than Brandt expected. Perhaps he never realized that after his disappearance, his wife was told he was dead.

    He can only try to explain (in another man’s voice) all that has taken place.  He quickly realizes that she cannot take all this in.  Life has already dealt her one too many grim surprises.

    He speaks to her from behind a screen, afraid of the added shock of her seeing him.  When Ella finally does,  she faints.  She regains consciousness but the couple is past the point of ever communicating:

    “Don’t touch me.”

    “I wouldn’t harm you, Ella.  I’m your husband.”

    “You’re not anything….human.”

    Veteran director, Terence Fisher described this movie as the love story he had wanted to create. He ultimately succeeded… although of course it is a tragic one.  Ella is faithful to her husband’s memory for years, while his mind was imprisoned.  And when he finally can return, he can’t reach Ella.

    Give credit too, to a powerful script from Bert Batt, an assistant director who was never able to sell another screenplay.  And to Fisher, for a unique, powerful love story, taking place under bizarre circumstances.

    Peter Cushing as always, is excellent as the baron.  Maxine Audley is effective too, in the difficult role of Ella Brandt.  And Freddie Jones, so powerful as the cruel carnival owner in The Elephant Man, has probably never been better as the tormented
    Brandt/Richter.

  • HORRROR OF DRACULA

         Horror of Dracula was an eye-opener when it was first released (in 1957).  In his great book of short reviewsThe Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film, Michael Weldon calls it “The best vampire film ever made.”  I think he’s absolutely right.

         Its studio, Hammer, had a small budget to work with.   Much less freedom to use special effects likethose, for example in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, years later.  Hammer had to leave out several parts of the novel requiring special effects.

       Still the stripped-down plot taken from Bram Stoker’s great 1897 novel is focused and absorbing; scenes and images will stay with you.  Screenwriter Jimmy Sangster and director Terence Fisher got what they wanted.

      They believed that, to tell the story right, their movie needed two elements.   First, to spill blood like never before.   Second, the freedom to show women lusting for Count Dracula.  It meant pushing the censors (even stricter in the United Kingdom than in the USA) to new limits.  Remember, 1957 was still the era of Doris Day/Rock Hudson comedies.

       Horror of Dracula did not share much with the 1931 Universal Studios Dracula.But surprisingly, this was a good thing.   Most of that movie had been based on a Broadway play; the longer it goes on, the more stage-y it feels. The new Count Dracula, Christopher Lee,had never seen the Universal movie.   Instead, he reread the novel–many times, for his inspiration.

    image

    Christopher Lee–Dracula

       The opening scenes succeed in translating much of the
    book’s atmosphere.  The count is polite and speaks good
    English.   You don’t immediately feel anything sinister about him.  But all this is just a mask; you learn real fast that things are wrong here.

       Jonathan Harker has come to Castle Dracula in the disguise of librarian, his real mission to destroy Dracula. The count gives Harker a brief, but warm welcome.  He says little except for his compliments while he looks at photos of Harker’s beautiful fiancée Lucy.

       But you learn how false this mask is.  That night Harker walks downstairs and meets a woman begging him forhelp.  She tells him that Dracula is keeping her prisoner.

       Harker is unsure whether to believe her.  But when he later wanders downstairs, he accepts her word for everything.  Again the same embrace but this time with a savage difference; she turns her mouth to his neck and bares her teeth to bite him.

       What follows is probably the most intense scene in director Fisher’s career.  You see Dracula at the top of the staircase, face in close-up, eyes bright red.  In an instant he is down the stairs, throwing the woman to the floor.  She hisses back at him in pure fury.

    .image

    The savagery behind the polite shell

    .

    The two of them literally snarl at one another, hungry cats fighting over a scrap of food.

        Or maybe; two junkies fighting over just enough dope to get one of them off.  You feel a sense of viciousness, rarely experienced onscreen 70 years ago.  It shows another side of Dracula, one that stays with you.  A truth about him that makes Lucy and Mina’s craving for him more unsettling.    You have already seen his animal side.

    image

    Harker abruptly realizes what he is dealing with 

    Harker is soon dead, a victim of his own bad judgment in trying to
    stake Dracula. But Harker’s work is taken up by a new vampire
    hunter—Dr. Van Helsing.  An insightful, intelligent, imaginative, articulate, courageous man.  Someone who’s able to deal with vampires, but with others too:  Superstitious peasants in Transylvania, terrified of strangers.  Members of the Victorian-era middle class with just enough scientific knowledge to reject anything they believe is superstition. (The movie is set in Germany but its characters seem much more English than German.)

       Worst, a middle class that puts down its women, ignoring both their intellect and their sexuality.  The men, mostly pompous, self-satisfied, know-it-alls.   The women’s lives empty and boring.  It’s no great surprise these women are ready to follow a figure as charismatic as Dracula.

        Van Helsing knows all this and knows he must deal with these things alone.

       As he moves from each closed world to another, Van Helsing must deal with the peasants’ mistrust, and the  Holmwoods’ (Jonathan’s close friends) lack of belief. His job is especially difficult with this family.  Van Helsing needs to respectfully, yet forcefully convince them their rational, scientific outlook is accurate… but limited. Vampires still exist, and modern science is helpless against them.

       Most of all Van Helsing understands vampires; their craving for blood, a craving that inevitably strips away all humanity.  A craving more potent than friendship, love, even the taboos against harming a child.  He knows what Harker did not; how to use the weapons he has.image

    Dr. Van Helsing–great personal courage 

         When the scene shifts from Transylvania to middle-class Germany, Van Helsing has the difficult job of telling Harker’s friends that Jonathan is dead.    With great tact, Van Helsing wins over Mr. Holmwood.

        At this same moment, Van Helsing faces a new crisis.  Lucy, Harker’s fiancée, has been suffering anemia without explanation.  Lucy is a kindhearted but naive woman, over-protected all her life.  Her future already determined: wife and mother in the privileged class.

       Slowly but surely you sense a change in Lucy. As much as any British movie at that time could show, you feel her yearning, then lusting, for an unknown force to possess her. Watch her reaction to the garlic placed at her window for protection (no, it’s not the smell that makes her uneasy.) Watch her lie down in bed and open her nightgown to expose her throat.   Then watch her look of quiet
    expectation as the wind swirls the leaves outside her window.

    image

     Lucy waits for the Count; subtle images yet nearly censored in 1957

        She waits for someone, the opposite of the gracious but utterly bland Jonathan.  Someone with no hesitation about taking what he wants.   The count has left his castle and descended upon a  society with no defense against him.  Gasoline and matches.

       Lucy dies from loss of blood.  She is buried, yet Tania, a servant’s young child, has seen her at night, in the garden.  Van Helsing knows what must be done.

        Already, Lucy has asked Tania to go walking with her.  Without showing any violence, the movie makes it clear; though Lucy has known Tania for years, the girl is nothing to her now.  Only an easy  blood-meal.  You are light-years away here from the little girl in
    Interview with the Vampire.

       Van Helsing, not a pious man, is described by critics as a man with an intimate knowledge of sacred objects as weapons
    in his arsenal.  He uses a cross to stop Lucy in her tracks
    by placing it against her forehead, burning her deeply.  She
    flees back to her crypt.  Tania watches, one small step from
    hysteria.  Her plea, “I want to go home,” only hints at how
    close she is to chaos.

      But Van Helsing stays in control.  “And so you shall,” he tells her, his words symbolizing the calm presence he brings.  Very quietly, very assuredly he asks Tania to wait for him.

       Van Helsing must convince Holmwood that their only way to save Lucy’s soul is to drive a stake through her heart.  (In the novel, they must also cut her head off.)

        Blood gushes, but Van Helsing finishes his work.  Afterwards, his wisdom is clearly shown by the transformed expression on Lucy’s face, the sweetness, the innocence of the old Lucy.

         The violence that Fisher believed he needed to show is essential.  Lucy’s demonic urges must be purged from her to restore her to purity.  To understand, to taste for yourself the transformation from Lucy to vampire, then back to Lucy, you need to see the cancer cut out of her.

         Critics at the time, especially in England, criticized Fisher’s onscreen violence.  He believed that storytellers of magical tales needed to portray the struggle between good and evil graphically.  Suggestion was not enough.  His goal was not the ambiguity Val
    Lewton aimed for, and achieved so well, in Cat People and
    The Seventh Victim.  Instead Fisher strived for something closer to the horror of Germanic folk tales and legends.  The ones before well-meaning people created tamer versions, believing these tales must be made suitable for children.

        Sadly, time and budget limits meant that many of the novel’s characters had to be minimized or left out completely.  Stoker’s theme of a group of brothers and a sister united by common blood against a sinister foe is gone.  Van Helsing must face Dracula alone.

          In every way, he is up to the task. Horror of Dracula becomes a pure action movie after the count begins his flight back to the castle and Transylvania.  And it may be Hammer’s best action movie ever.  A fight to the death between two figures, both larger
    than life.  Peter Cushing, with a style of acting once described as “fussy” proves himself not just scholarly, but tough.

       Hammer’s peak years lasted until about 1962. The studio never could top what they achieved in this movie. Only one vampire movie The Brides of Dracula, even comes close, along with a scattering of others.  Hammer tried to ride the wave of freedom to show more sex, nudity, and violence in the late 60’s but it was too late.  Horror of Dracula remains their best, the real deal, especially when you imagine how it must have felt to people accustomed to Rock Hudson/Doris Day.  Don’t miss this one.

  • THE WOMAN IN BLACK

       The fury of a mother believing her son was stolen from her…later, left to die.  Her endless search for justice—or maybe endless vengeance… going way past an-eye-for-an-eye.

    A young father dealing with the loss of his wife in childbirth.  He struggles to crawl out of the place he has escaped to…he knows his son needs him.   But the pain of feeling is nearly unbearable.   Now he is threatened with losing his job—his work record has been poor since her death. He knows he and his boy stand on the edge of disaster.The last thing the young man needs is to enter this woman’s world—yet he has no choice, if he wants to save his
    job.  The house where this woman hanged herself needs to be
    sold, and his law firm demands he settle the paperwork. “This is your final warning,” is how the head of the fir
    puts it.

    The man, Arthur Kipps (Daniel Radcliffe, veteran of the Harry Potter series) comes to a town haunted by unending tragedy.  All Arthur wants is to take care of legal business but he is unwelcome.   He cannot understand the reasons all at once.  Everyone in town wants him to gather the papers he needs—and get out—now.

    But Arthur can’t do what is necessary without staying a while and investigating a house no one wants any part of.  Everyone in town fears that the vengeful woman’s spirit haunts this house.  If her spirit is disturbed in any way, the town will suffer more tragedy; they already have suffered deeply.

    Arthur needs to spend time there, with only a small dog for company.  Some of these stretches will feel like your standard generic haunted-house movie: the mysterious noises, the ghostly figures emerging in silence, the white faces of dead children standing motionless in the rain, the creepy wind-up toys banging cymbals or shakingtheir tambourines at the most suspenseful moments.

    image

    Arthur–no choice but to deal with the house and its legacy

    Yet Arthur’s character takes this story in some new directions.  His personal tragedy (the death of his beautiful young wife) gives him courage.  Whatever spirits and ghosts he runs into, they can’t do much more to him than life already has.  The house hasn’t got much that can really scare him—he has a job to do, and he is already numb.  You don’t expect him to run screaming out of this house unless it’s something really serious.

    image

    Personal tragedy has left him with little else to fear

    The irony is that people in town are exactly right—any time the lady has a reason to appear, children will die. And anyone who sees her (Arthur the most likely)—spreads death like a contagious disease.  Her presence at the house is unmistakable—Arthur sees her again and again.  Just glimpses, but enough.  The first child Arthur sees face to face in town dies that day; she drinks lye before anyone has a chance to save her.

    Everyone is positive this girl won’t be the last to die—Arthur has seen the woman,and this makes him a sure messenger of death.

    image

    image

    Three more children, swept up in Jennet’s spell

    You learn that the vengeful woman in black, Jennet, lost her son to her sister, Alice Drablow.  Her son Nathaniel never got the sweet, loving cards Jennet sent him—Alice hid them.  Alice even got legal papers signed to keep Jennet from visiting.  Later on, Jennet came to believe that Alice left Nathaniel to die when their coach sank into mud on the causeway between the house and the mainland.

    You watch the movie, and wait to see who in town conspired with Alice the most.  On whom the vengeance needed to strike the hardest.  And ironically the answer is no one—there are no more dirty secrets.  At least none that the movie tells you.  The
    Woman in Black’s plot actually reminds me less of an English ghost story than those of recent Japanese horror movies
    such as The Grudge or The Ring—where an avenging spirit will hurt anyone it comes across, guilty or innocent.  All it wants to do is lash out—at everyone and anyone.

    Arthur doesn’t understand all of this yet.  He knows that Jennet’s spirit has found no rest…and how the deaths of children in town took place.  All of them appeared to be under a deep spell.  They suddenly stopped whatever they were doing, and walked out of windows, or walked into the sea.  The second girl Arthur saw dies by setting herself on fire. What he does believe in is justice, and
    bringing the deaths to an end.

    He is searching for a way to make everything right.  His wife’s death could have affected him in radically different ways.  He could have become uncaring…believing the Universe is uncaring; why should he care about anyone.

    Or his pain could have made him determined to do the best he can, whenever he can, even when he is tempted to slide back into not caring, to escape his own pain.  Watch him put a tiny bird back into its nest while he explores the creepiest room in the house.   Then a crow screams, making him jump.  It lands on a bed.  But Arthur means to do the right thing and let it escape—and he makes sure he does.

    Eventually he decides he must re-unite the woman’s spirit with the body of her dead son…even though he must risk his life pulling the child’s body free from the thick black mud surrounding the causeway.  Many of us who have experienced sorrow will later make a similar decision–we need to do the right thing.

    The film-makers tried to find a middle ground between the quiet, subtle, almost mannered approach of The Innocents, or The Others, and the loud, slam-shocks and close-ups of Drag Me to Hell or Se7en.
    The shocks do tend to be loud in volume, but with hardly any blood, let alone body parts getting chopped off.  Their goal
    was not gore. But they did not want a stuffy period piece either.
    This is no Masterpiece Theater.

    One of the few movies I remember close to this one was the much underrated 1979 film The Changeling, with George C. Scott.  Like
    Arthur, John Russell (Scott’s character) is grieving family deaths, and like Arthur, he has no intentions of confronting any ghosts.  But his exploring an old house frees a spirit looking for justice over a past wrong.

    That story was probably a more traditional one—revenge is visited on the guilty—and only on the guilty. Too many of the concrete facts are left out in The Woman in Black. You are never told for sure, but it appears that Jennet never had the chance to revenge herself on her sister.  In some way, Alice was able to escape Jennet’s reach, her hatred.

    Jennet’s spirit became the proverbial bottomless pit—no amount of vengeance could ever satisfy her.

    Many say there are no new stories to tell…and they have some convincing arguments.  But there are not many stories like this one; a spirit of pure hatred, face to face with a character who has almost gone past fear.  An individual struggling to find meaning in the death of someone they loved deeply. You don’t get a twist ending, at least not the kind you have grown to expect the last twenty years or so.  Instead, this story brings you to a conclusion that clearly shows you what each individual carries with them.  Many American Buddhists are taught some variation on the following: Don’t look at the notion of karma as simply, We all get what we deserve.  There’s a lot more to it.  You can look at
    the ending as plain and simple…or something more subtle, that you need to think more about.  I really don’t want to give anything more away, to risk ruining it.  See it, judge for yourself.

  • WHITE ZOMBIE

          There are some movies that bring out a wide range of opinions.  Lots of people really like them.  Lots really hate them.  Plenty of people are scattered in-between.

       White Zombie is one of those movies. There are plenty of reasons.  Not all the acting is good. Some is plain bad, especially that of the hero and heroine.  White Zombie was made just after the silent-film era ended.  Like many early talkies, some of its acting feels awkward, dated.  In addition, this movie was made on a low budget, and this hurts it at certain points.  (One major flub was accidentally left in; look closely when Silver, Beaumont’s servant is thrown into the water near the end.)  You also find humor, possibly too much humor, especially one running gag that wears out pretty fast.

    Then why do other people like it so much? First, its atmosphere  is often genuinely creepy.  Again and again, you get a feeling that characters are in way over their heads, trying to deal with forces
    they are ignorant of.  Forces they are unable to fight, even if they understood them better.

    Beaumont, the sleazy rich man may remind you a little of Mickey Mouse in The Sorcerer’s Apprentice.  He has played with magic and now the magic is pulling him under, drowning him.

    Bela Lugosi’s character, Murder Legendre is the zombie-maker that Beaumont has paid to turn the woman he loves into a zombie.  Legendre is more than idle talk, way more.  He has the powers he claims to have.  Soon Beaumont is realizing the terrible price of dealing with Legendre.

    Lugosi’s best known character, Count Dracula was pure evil, with no redeeming features.  But for many years now, he has become a rather clichéd character. He has some of the vampire’s traditional powers, but you don’t  see him use these powers much.

    Legendre is also pure evil, but more than Dracula, he is someone capable of doing real damage.  Along with Beaumont, you get to see his evil potential.  Legendre and the Sayer of the Law in The Island of Lost Souls are probably Lugosi’s all-time best roles.
    image

    Murder Legendre–perhaps Lugosi’s best role

    The story seems pretty straight-forward…at first.  The beautiful Madeline has come to Haiti to marry Neil, after a long engagement.  Beaumont, the rich. man Madeline meets on her way there, has fallen wildly in love with her.  To turn Madeline into a zombie and keep her his captive, Beaumont has made a deal with Murder Legendre.  Beaumont hopes that he can make the zombie-Madeline fall in love with him.

    It is up to Neil along with an old missionary, Bruner to get Madeline away from Beaumont.  Bruner is the only character who knows enough about voodoo to match Legendre’s powers.

    Why else does White Zombie work?  It deals for example with this frightening question:

    What might it feel like to experience your human qualities, the capabilities you take for granted, begin to  slip away from you?  To turn powerless, or into a zombie, unable to think?  Except for some of David Cronenberg’s imaginative films (for example,
    The Fly, The Brood, Videodrome, Naked Lunch),   It’s a question that not enough horror movies ever deal with. The Thing (1982) which probably included the best special effects to that point, never really goes there.

         White Zombie is able to open this frightening door a little.  This is a scene with Legendre and Beaumont and you don’t want to be in Beaumont’s place. Legendre is reminding Beaumont of the day they made the deal for Madeline’s soul.  At that moment Beaumont had refused to shake Legendre’s hand. (Beaumont is the kind of arrogant aristocrat who hires others to do his dirty work.) Now, Beaumont’s hand has turned useless.  You see him
    vainly trying to prod or twist or flex some life back into it.

    Nothing works.  Beaumont can no longer speak, but he is still able to hear.  Legendre reminds him of his past insult.  He tells Beaumont that he, Legendre, has turned men into zombies before, but Beaumont is the first to know what was happening to them.   Then he adds, “We understand each other better now.”

    Beaumont makes a small, pathetic try at touching Legendre’s hand with his own.  Legendre pats the useless hand, then walks away while Beaumont continues to struggle. And like him, you sit there letting your imagination do its worst.

    In addition, a lot of White Zombie’s power comes from its taking place in a Third-World country in which an ancient folk tradition, voodoo, is as strong as organized religion.  Of the American and European characters, only Bruner has the knowledge to deal with voodoo.  He tells Neil straight out that the authorities in this country are too intimidated by magic to come to their aid.

    And here is where the movie gets into questions of political correctness and racism.  It can’t avoid them, when you think about it.

    You can say “Well… this is the 1930’s and these characters are typical of that (pre-Civil Rights Era) time. They are probably scared as hell to be the minority race—White.”   One of Neil’s comments is particularly racist; “Alive…in the hands of Natives?  Better dead than that.”

    But I think if we are honest with ourselves, some of that feeling still exists in white people now.  For example, you feel a big relief when Neil, Madeline, and the coach driver are finally off the road and safe on Mr. Beaumont’s property.  (Keep in mind, the driver who is Afro-American, is more afraid than they are.)

    image

    For me, the Black-White issues are definitely part of the ominous quality you feel.  But if you are not White, you can still find things to be scared about.  The zombies who stay with Legendre, ready at any time to do his bidding are all White men.  But they are slaves.  Their power to function, think, and feel has been torn out, obliterated out of them by Legendre. They are no better off than the zombies at Legendre’s mill, whose entire existence comes down to turning the creaking wheel in that same endless circle, hour after hour after hour. In an understated way this is one of the creepiest moments in the movie.

    image

    The mill

    Keep in mind too, that White Zombie was made during the worst of the Great Depression.  In those.days, mandatory overtime was a lot more than a temporary inconvenience.  Nobody knew yet if the Depression had bottomed out or how much longer it could go on.  Conditions today are not as tough.  But most of us (whatever our race and ethnic background) know, or at least know of, someone older, unable to retire, forced to work at Wal-Mart, or some supermarket or mega-pharmacy. White Zombie taps into those fears too.  For many people in the early 1930’s, jobs not much better than in Legendre’s sugar mill were all that stood between them and homeless life.  Those were the only choices left.

    Before the Depression hit, supernatural themes in American movies were rare.  In those movies, characters would stay in haunted houses and see ghosts, for example. But almost without
    exception the magic and the ghosts turned out to be fakery at
    the end.  Explanations turned out to be rational and realistic.

    Here, things feel bleak and out of control.  Legendre’s hands hold a candle wrapped in Madeline’s scarf, and he squeezes the candle into the shape he wants.  At the same moment Madeline starts to
    give a corny, conventional wedding toast, then suddenly looks into her glass and says “I see…Death.”  She collapses and appears to die.  Intense stuff for a mainstream American movie.

    image

    Madeline

    Some of the music is effective too.  The funeral chant as the
    movie opens is another reminder that you are now in an alien
    land.   Much later Neil finally reaches the castle where Madeline is a prisoner.

    You sense their souls reaching out, trying somehow to contact the other.  The hymn Listen to the Lambs, hummed, with no musical accompaniment, is eerie and dramatic at this moment.

    Pick a night when you’re feeling patient and open to. suggestion, the darker and quieter the better.

    Forget about some of the bad acting and dialogue, and concentrate on the atmosphere.  White Zombie may very well
    surprise you.

  • THE BROOD

         Many of us have heard about “cycles of family violence. “  How this violence is likely to pass down from the abused child to their children when that child becomes a parent.  Maybe you are talking to someone about a painful childhood, and suddenly they stop and say, “I’ve become my father.”

    Or my mother… take your pick, whatever applies.   If you know enough family history, you may even be able to trace the inheritance of abuse from generation to generation, until someone is able to put a stop to it.
    Psychologists call this “the break generation,” the one who
    ends the cycle.  One example was John Lennon, an abandoned
    son himself.  (To be fair to Lennon’s father, he did offer John the chance to live with him and was turned down, when John was a young child.)

    Years later, Lennon chose the life of stay-at -home father while his second son, Sean was growing up.  He also worked hard to make up for the time he had missed with his first son, Julian, after he and Julian’s mother were divorced.

    Most of us have heard stories about physical manifestations—people so ill for example that they fantasize about being crucified, and then develop marks on their hands as though nails had been driven through them.

    The Brood plunges you straight down into a bad dream combining these themes:  The cycle of family violence, and the stories of physical manifestations.  I don’t want to give away too much as to who—or what, the Brood are, except to say that they are child-like beings.  And that certain abused people can use them to strike out at those who hurt them.

    Frank, a divorced father with a young daughter, Candy, believes his ex-wife Nola is abusing Candy, and that he needs to keep Nola away from her.  Frank has plenty of good reasons for his suspicions.  He can see bruises on Candy’s back.  Second, Nola has committed herself into a psychiatric institute, known as Somafree.

    Somafree is run by Dr. Hal Raglan, whose therapy methods are controversial.  Some call him a genius. They rave about his book
    The Shape of Rage concerning childhood abuse. Others, some of Raglan’s former patients, say he has made
    them worse, and are preparing lawsuits against him.

    Frank has seen moments of Raglan at work with patients when he visited Somafree to pick up Candy.  He can see the man’s
    charisma, and his sharp insights.   But Frank can also see a
    man with an ego out of control, taking people to places where they may well be dangerous to others and themselves.  And there is no mistaking the bruising that he sees on Candy. Raglan’s approach is for Nola, like his other patients, to confront her rage toward her parents.  Nola’s mother is an alcoholic who abused her and continues to deny it happened.  She still drinks heavily, even when Candy is with her.  Nola’s father Barton was a weak man who stood by and let the abuse go on.

    The director David Cronenberg has talked about how personal feelings concerning his painful divorce went into writing and directing The Brood.  The stories are most insightful. But the movie itself is the ultimate proof of those intense emotions, and of his directing skill.

    Years ago, one critic described The Brood as Cronenberg’s one good film.
    At that time, this was arguably a fair criticism.  But since
    then, several other Cronenberg movies have shown this picture was no fluke.  Many people have their own personal favorites he
    directed, mine being perhaps his warmest and most hopeful,
    The Dead Zone.

    Cronenberg has been successful recently with two  mainstream movies, A History of Violence, and Eastern Promises. But years ago, he was known as a cult director with a reputation for the bizarre and the grotesque.  Martin Scorsese actually said he had been frightened about meeting Cronenberg for the first time.  (Cronenberg described Scorsese as someone “who should have known better.”)  In the media, Cronenberg was known as “the king of venereal horror” and worse.

    In these movies, ordinary people’s bodies went through incredible changes, disturbing, at times disgusting. They Came from Within: Human bodies were invaded by strange parasites described then as a cross between a penis and a large turd.  One character lies on his back, watching the outlines of the parasites as they move through his body.  Rabid:  a woman develops a
    hypodermic growth in her armpit that kills the men who embrace
    her.

    In The Brood, Dr. Raglan has been able to get some of his patients to express their anger into physical manifestations: marks on their bodies, or worse, tumors, “lymphosarcoma.”

    But with Nola he has gone much further. She has actually given birth to living creatures—other people at the Institute have mistaken them for children. These creatures, her brood, have a clear sense of who it is that Nola feels angriest with.

    Possibly a child advocate could argue that
    this movie exploits violence against children for the sake of
    horror.  They are definitely entitled to their point of view.

    My opinion:  this movie is much more than
    that.  It’s much more than the bad guys getting what they
    deserve, or a bunch of evil children who kill teenagers after
    the teenagers have sex

    .image

    A glimpse of the brood–in the house where Nola grew up

    The bad parents do get a kind of justice.  But innocent people get hurt too.  Cronenberg’s screenplay is not perfect but it’s good enough to make you care a lot about the main characters. For example, you feel Candy’s pain over and over again.  A sweet little girl who has never hurt anyone.  She is torn between two parents who both love her. She nearly sees her grandmother killed, then is terrorized by the same creature who did the killing.  You don’t realize until much later that she knows who these creatures are. Later they enter her classroom and quietly walk away with her into a snowstorm;  a scene that is poetic in the grimmest kind of way…one of the best moments in any Cronenberg movie.

    image

    Nola’s venomous wishes–made real

    You can criticize the ending as kind of clichéd, possibly a cheap shot.  But the image you are left with is something else—Candy’s sad, hurt expression as she sits in silence.

  • 28 DAYS LATER

        It would be easy for zombie- movie fans to take this film lightly.   To call it a combined rip-off of the Night of the Living Dead/Dawn of the Dead/Day of the Dead series, the under-appreciated early 70’s movie The Crazies, Stephen King’s The Stand, and lots more you will probably remember.  Technically it isn’t even about zombies, but people infected with a virus.

        But writer Alex Garland and director Danny Boyle have taken some familiar elements and given them a freshness, an originality, even a vision, that is uniquely their own.  They have come up with a plot that is simple but tight, and well-drawn characters. They also give you several subtle reminders as to how precious our stressed-out, early 21st century life can be, as aggravating as it feels day-to-day.

         This movie could have taken a paranoid viewpoint, with mega-corporations uniting to enslave the world with disease.  Instead you see a series of careless errors that come together to set off bigger and bigger explosions.  First, scientists create a virus called Rage.  Then they test it on chimpanzees which are locked in cruel confinement (tiny glass tanks).  The Rage virus turns the chimpanzees into killing machines ready to go off at any time.

        Then, animal rights activists liberate them.

        The activists really want to do the right thing.  Given the amount of abuse done to apes in the name of science, these activists refuse to believe a researcher who tells them they are making a terrible mistake.  They react to this man like he is “the boy who cried wolf.”  Only this time it’s no bullshit.  With their idealistic
    animals-rights agenda, they are literally letting a plague loose
    on the world.  Not only do the infected chimps attack the first human they get their hands on, but in a matter of seconds you can see that she has been infected too,  just from the look in her eyes.

        Ignorance, coupled with foolishly dangerous, misguided science has resulted in a situation far worse than a conspiracy-theory believer could dream up.

        The movie’s hero, Jim, had been hospitalized for injuries from a traffic accident.  He awakes to silence that feels deafening .  Silence so thick you could cut it with a knife.  Outside the hospital,  he can see the usual pigeons and gulls but otherwise the city is lifeless; all is still, unmoving.  No people to be seen anywhere.  Familiar sights, the Tower of London, the Houses of Parliament, but everywhere the same deathly silence.

    image

    A bizarre dream–London without people

         Jim is not normally a man of action.  For a long time he wanders, not sure how to react. Ironically, the first living human he sees is a complete lunatic, a minister in his own church, a place you might
    well expect to serve as some sort of sanctuary. Jim pulls out of his apathy long enough to bash the minister with a bag full of metal cans.  This allows him to stay alive.

        After more wandering, a group of maniacs spot him.  Jim runs but you wonder how much further he can get.  At that moment he meets the first normal people he has seen, Selena and Mark.  They rescue Jim by setting the maniacs on fire.

    image

    Jim–One mistake can be fatal

          Jim can see that neither Selena nor Mark has been a soldier or police officer, but they have quickly learned how to survive in this new world. Selena quickly tells Jim there has been a plague, but not to ask too many questions;   “Staying alive is as good as
    it gets.”  The rules she and Mark follow are simple: never go anywhere alone, and never go out at night, unless absolutely necessary.  You soon learn one more valuable rule—if anyone you know catches the disease, you kill them with no hesitation.

        Selena and Mark go with Jim for a last visit to his house.  Because it’s too late to walk back to a safe place before dark, they sleep there till the next day.  While Jim watches videos of his dead mother and father, a man enters through a window.  Clearly infected.  Mark and Jim are soon covered with blood while they subdue him.  Suddenly Selena kills Mark.  She tells Jim she knew right away that Mark was infected, by the expression on his face.  She is quick to add,  “ I’d do the same to you.”

    image

    One bite is all it takes

     Eventually, Jim and Selena find two more survivors living in a high-rise building, Frank and his daughter Hannah.  Holed up in this apartment, they hear a radio message promising help and safety, at a location near the city of Manchester.  After some hesitating,
    they decide to drive there.

    image

    Exposed and vulnerable

         Even though each attack by an Infected (as Selena calls them) is gruesome and thick with spattered blood, you are shown one reminder after another of how life was, how precious.  A life you probably take for granted, waking up each day and telling yourself something to the effect of—Same shit, different day.

        Only after this holocaust can people see the small touches of happiness they once had.  Jim’s family in the video, his mum’s book of recipes.  The goldfish in Frank’s apartment, trying to survive in just a few inches of water.  Some beautifully shot scenes of horses running wild in the countryside outside Manchester.   Jim
    feeling the breeze through the car windows.  Selena and Hannah playing cards in the back seat.

        They find the city of Manchester burning, but. also find the people who had been broadcasting salvation.    These people are
    army personnel and at first they seem decent enough.  Major
    West, the officer in charge, appears to have the trust of his
    soldiers.  He shows his practical side (keeping an Infected man chained, to see how long he will take to starve to death).  Also a touch of the philosopher: People were killing people before the
    plague hit, he says, and basically nothing has changed.

        But Major West is nowhere as sincere as he seems.  His radio message promised “salvation” but he is far from any cure for the virus.  He tries to justify the lie by saying he had no choice, that his men were on the brink of despair and suicide.  “I promised them women,” he explains.  “Women mean a future.”

        But for the soldiers, a future starting a new extended family is not a goal.  What they want are sex slaves, pure and simple.  They are ready to kill anyone standing in the way, whether it’s another soldier or Jim.

        For the first time, everything depends on Jim. (Frank was accidentally infected, and shot dead by two of the soldiers.)  To save Selena and Hannah, he must outwit more than a half-dozen armed soldiers, none of them exactly filled with compassion.  Without spoiling the ending, I will say this:  The next time Selena sees Jim, she is shocked to find (almost too late) that he is not one of the Infected.

        I enjoyed this movie the first time I saw it and it appears to get better each time I see it again. Selena and Jim’s parts are both written well and acted well.  (Naomie Harris is Selena; Cillian Murphy is Jim, both real good.)  Selena’s changes at many crucial moments from pure survival instinct back to a yearning to get close to people is touching.  Watch her face just after the wild horses have passed. She says to Jim, “I was wrong about saying: ‘staying alive is as good as it gets.’”

        You see the gradual changes in Jim.  At first he seems almost clueless, hoping he can avoid taking action,  not knowing how to take action.  You see a huge change in Jim when he realizes what
    the situation at the army camp really is.  Christopher Eccleston who has had plenty of experience playing men in pain  (Jude, A Price above Rubies, Let Him Have It) is all too believable as Major West .

          Those in positions of authority turn out to be as desperate (probably more desperate) than those people who came to them for salvation.  The Major appears to be saying to Jim: giving these women to my soldiers is the best I can do, under the circumstances.

         I could go on and on about a number of other characters and actors, but I’ll leave it at this: No one strikes a false note in this movie.

         The screenwriting and the directing are also excellent, though there are so many tilted shots you feel at times like you’re back watching the Batman TV show of the 60’s.  The digital photography which worked so effectively in Saving Private Ryan works well here too.
    And as horrible as the scenes with Infected attacking are, so
    many moments are just as effective in their still beauty. Not many movies are able to make you jump out of your seat at one moment, then silence you with stillness at another.

  • DEAD SILENCE

        Dead Silence sets its aim high, especially for a recent movie.  The filmmakers clearly wanted to tell an original story, not something re-hashed from bits and pieces of other plots.  They wanted the characters to be more than obnoxious people having lame conversations and casual sex before dying.
    Dead Silence also tried to blend a rather subtle, ghostly, haunted house atmosphere with a scattering of violence severe enough to give the movie an R rating, and an optional Unrated version.

        This is asking a lot—making a blend like that.  But Dead Silence achieves many of its goals. It wasn’t a big box-office hit, although it didn’t bomb either.  Still, this lack of success is saddening,
    considering how many uninspired sequels…and even Parts #3-4’s to various routine stuff are being made recently.

        What are some of the major goals that Dead Silence succeeds at?  Let’s go through some.  Story.  Characters.  The swings in
    atmosphere mentioned previously.  Then the acting. Ryan Kwanten, the Australian actor playing the hero Jamie, never overdoes it.  Yet his love for his wife and his unwavering search to bring her killer to justice give him courage which shows in all his scenes.  In just a few minutes near the beginning of Dead Silence, you get a sense of two people (Jamie and wife Lisa) who have truly bonded.

    image

    Miles away, many years later, the curse still reaches Jamie and Lisa

         After her death, Jamie is willing to go straight into Hell for answers, whatever his journey may bring.  (A good example: the scene where the clown says to him, “Come closer…”)

         Jamie and his wife Lisa had found a dummy delivered to their apartment.  No return address. Thinking nothing of it, Jamie goes downstairs for take-out food.  When he gets back, Lisa is dead.   And suddenly Jamie is convinced the dummy killed her.

        Dummies started showing up in movies at least as far back as Dead of Night (1945), possibly earlier than that.  Even Anthony Hopkins, more than 30 years before taking on Dr. Hannibal Lecter, made a movie with a dummy, Magic.  Fortunately, Dead Silence is not a slow build-upleading to a dummy gradually taking over someone’s mind, with one person after another telling that same character, “Oh… you’re just letting your imagination get the best of you…”

        Jamie returns to his home town, Raven’s Fair, a small, quiet, isolated place.  Years ago it was prosperous, now it is rundown for the most part.  He already has a good idea of what and who he is looking for.  As a kid, he and his friends had heard stories and scary rhymes about a lady named Mary Shaw.  Jamie believes there is a connection between her and the dummy that killed his wife.

        Mary Shaw, a resident of Raven’s Fair, had disappeared years before, but she had been famous in the town for her dummies and dolls.

         For years now, Jamie had been out of touch with anyone in the town.  He never got along with his father, had no idea that his father had remarried. (Bob Gunton, so powerful in The Shawshank Redemption as the corrupt warden, is effective as
    the father.)  His new wife, much younger than Jamie’s dad, hardly mentions Jamie’s grief, and generally seems a little too friendly to him.

        Mary Shaw’s memory still holds a power in this town, especially for the undertaker and his wife.  As frightened as the undertaker is, his wife is much worse—talking to herself, or to someone else only she can see… hiding from time to time in the crawlspace and basement.

       A New York City detective (Donnie Wahlberg) has followed Jamie to Raven’s Fair.  He doesn’t have enough evidence to arrest him yet but he is sure Jamie committed the murder.  He also doesn’t want Jamie to bury the dummy. (Something  the undertaker’s wife tells Jamie he must do.)

    image

    Jamie–Lisa’s death makes him follow the clues, even if he
    must die to do it

         At last, the undertaker is willing to reveal what he knows about Mary Shaw.  His story is similar to what Jamie remembers hearing as a boy.  Mary lived alone with her dolls and dummies, and was a skilled ventriloquist. Occasionally she did an act at a stately theater located on a lake.

        But there is more.  The undertaker still has intense memories of the last show that Mary did.  He was a sensitive young boy then, very polite, very respectful.

        But another boy at that show was the opposite—rude and disrespectful.  This boy criticized Mary’s skill (he yelled out he saw her lips move while she did her act).  Not long after, the same boy disappeared and was never seen again.  Then several others from Raven’s Fair disappeared too.  Shortly after, Mary  disappeared.  Later, you learn that it wasn’t the boy’s rudeness so much that angered Mary.  It was his suggesting that her dummy Billy wasn’t real.

         Some of the plotting seems a little far-fetched.  You generally didn’t see that much rudeness in small-town America at that time, except where people had big class differences.  Another thing; after all these disappearances in Raven’s Fair, wouldn’t the FBI or at least the state police be called in?

        But as unlikely as you would expect, two scenes here are the strongest in the movie.  First the undertaker’s memories of going down to his father’s workroom to get another look at the dead Mary (his father was also an undertaker). Second, the old photos of Mary’s victims seated grotesquely next to each other, their mouths mutilated.

        The undertaker is afraid to help Jamie more than this.  Jamie goes to what is left of the theater where Mary did her last show, and to Mary’s home near-by.  Here he finds some of her  sketchbooks, featuring designs for more realistic dummies (very creepy, although the pages look way too clean, considering  their age).  Jamie’s father also fills in some of the story from years ago.   The rude kid at the show was Michael Ashen,  Jamie’s great-uncle.
    Jamie’s family and their friends killed Mary Shaw.

      image

    Mary and one of her children 

       Plenty more plot twists and turns are still to come.  But
    perhaps the most frightening scene is only a brief suggestion;
    that Michael was not killed right away, but slowly turned into a
    doll by Mary.

       Again, it is sad that Dead Silence did not do better in theaters (I need to check out how the video has done).  Meanwhile, the same director’s Saw, a much cruder, less imaginative movie, has already been followed by one sequel after the next.  I found it original, but not much more than that.  I’m thinking I need to watch it again, and then figure out if I missed something.