Category: Hammer / Classic English

  • FRANKENSTEIN MUST BE DESTROYED

        Frankenstein Must be Destroyed was the next-to-last appearance of Peter Cushing as Baron Frankenstein.  This movie does have its faults. Probably the most serious; you have virtually no reason to sympathize with the baron anymore.  He is almost
    overwhelmingly evil.

    But after an undistinguished first half, things change radically.  The movie takes a devastating detour, turning into a bizarre, tragic love story, as powerful as it is unexpected.  You suddenly find yourself in a different tale.  Not the baron’s anymore, but that of Dr. Brandt and his wife Ella.

    Imagine being light-years away from the person you
    loved most.  Then years later, you are back in the same
    house, close enough to watch them sleep.  Yet you know this
    is as close to them as you can ever get.

    Many reasons for this.  But the strongest
    one: you really aren’t you anymore.  It is a
    startling idea, especially in a movie made in the late
    ‘60’s.

    Much of the story up till then has gone in a
    different direction.  You watch the baron, feeling regret,
    but much more, feeling disgust.   His positive feelings
    have been bled out of him.  He does violence without
    regret.

    As the movie opens, a well-dressed man walks down a street.  Suddenly another figure emerges from the shadows, a scythe in his hand.  In one stroke, he slices off the first man’s head, and calmly places it into a box he brought for this purpose.  This is your re- introduction to the new, savagely embittered Baron  Frankenstein.

    How has he become so cruel, so lacking in feeling?  Without excusing him, the movie gives you an explanation.

    The baron sees himself as a man of vision, someone able to
    see past the limits of the scientific establishment. For years, he has waited, relishing his opportunity to show them his greatness and their small-mindedness.

    But despite his brilliance and imagination, he has seen frustration after frustration.  Is it God, or fate, or luck, or karma or Murphy’s Law?  The baron, a materialist through and through, is only sure it is not God… because God does not exist.   He is
    only sure of his ever-growing fury and ruthlessness, as though he is at war with the Universe.

    Baron Frankenstein tries to start fresh in a new town with a new identity, Mr. Fenner.  (He is careful not to call himself “Doctor.”)     In no time, his beautiful landlady, Anna, and her fiancé, Dr. Karl Holst, have become his blackmail victims.  (Anna’s mother lives in an expensive hospice, and Karl has been stealing cocaine from the medical facility and selling it, to pay for her stay.)

    The Baron does not need their help for a new creation.  He has something more urgent in mind. It turns out that the Baron’s former research colleague, Dr. Brandt is an inmate at the hospital for the insane where Karl works.

    It is Dr. Brandt’s help that the Baron needs. Brandt has made progress where the Baron was unsuccessful. Baron Frankenstein is obsessed with finding out Brandt’s discoveries.

    However the medical staff is sure that Brandt is unreachable.  His devoted wife Ella continues to visit him, never giving up hope that he will recover. He shows no response to her.  To the doctors,
    he alternates between long stretches of total apathy and short bursts of  violence.

    Yet the baron believes he can cure Brandt’s insanity.  He can see only one way to solve this problem. Brandt must literally be kidnapped out of the hospital. With Karl’s help the baron is able
    to do this.  Amazingly, he is also able to cure Brandt’s insanity through surgery.  image

    The surgery transferring Brandt’s brain turns out to be the
    easy part 

    But fate continues to plague Baron Frankenstein.  In getting free, Brandt has suffered a heart attack.  The baron knows Brandt has only days to live. Frankenstein’s solution is grim but simple; he kills a respected surgeon, Dr. Richter, and places Brandt’s brain
    in Richter’s body.

    Again his gift for surgery serves the baron well.  And again fate betrays him; Brandt’s wife sees Frankenstein on the street, and believing she recognizes him, follows him home.

    The baron greets her warmly, and deceives her with a brilliant mix of truth, lies, and omissions.  He admits he is Frankenstein, and explains that kidnapping her husband was necessary  to restore his sanity.  Then he tells her she may see her husband, though she may have trouble recognizing him, covered with bandages.  Doing this allows him not to tell her that her husband’s brain is now in Richter’s body.

    Unable to speak yet, Brandt is able to communicate with hand movements.  In addition, he recognizes his wife’s voice and can tell her this. The baron’s plan is working to perfection.  He convinces Mrs. Brandt that her husband needs rest.   But she is welcome anytime to see him.  The minute she is gone, he turns to
    Karl and says, “Pack.  We’re leaving.”

    Frankenstein, Karl, Anna and Dr. Brandt (in Dr. Richter’s body) find refuge in a deserted estate.  In the next few minutes you start to realize: this is not Frankenstein’s story anymore.  It is Brandt’s story now; his desperate try at returning home, in every sense of the word.

    Perhaps Brandt realizes right away that he and his wife can never regain what they have lost. He has access to all his former consciousness, but the wrong body; the old one is dead.  His wife will only see him as another face, hear him as another voice.

    And if she could ever accept him this way, it is too late now.   She has been shocked, traumatized too many times.  Already she has lived through his plunge into insanity, followed by years in the hospital. Years he was unable to even give her a smile of recognition.  The kidnapping.  Her joy at the baron telling her, her husband has returned and is sane now.  Then both her husband and the baron disappearing.

    And the final stab, the police showing her, her dead husband’s body. A brilliant, resourceful man, Brandt must realize too that Baron Frankenstein will never leave them in peace again.The baron is a force of nature, dead set on finding out Brandt’s conclusions.  At the risk of stretching things a little, Frankenstein reminds me of Hannibal Lecter—he never stops coming at you.

    Brandt escapes from the baron and heads straighthome.  Already he can sense just how poor the odds are
    that he and his wife can start a second life together.  Life
    has hurt her too much for her to accept him.  Second,
    Frankenstein will stop at nothing to get to his (Brandt’s)
    research conclusions. The baron would even kill Ella; her
    life means nothing to him.

    Brandt gets home.  He knows how much he needs to
    do before Frankenstein gets there.  Time is precious beyond belief.  He yearns to speak to Ella after so long.
    Yet he realizes full well how difficult it will be; to explain all that’s happened.  The music is poignant as he stands there a moment, watching her as she sleeps, but afraid to wake her.

    The best he can do is leave her a note, hope she reads it next morning, and speak to her then.

    Next day he is there when she wakes. Ella reacts with even more pain than Brandt expected. Perhaps he never realized that after his disappearance, his wife was told he was dead.

    He can only try to explain (in another man’s voice) all that has taken place.  He quickly realizes that she cannot take all this in.  Life has already dealt her one too many grim surprises.

    He speaks to her from behind a screen, afraid of the added shock of her seeing him.  When Ella finally does,  she faints.  She regains consciousness but the couple is past the point of ever communicating:

    “Don’t touch me.”

    “I wouldn’t harm you, Ella.  I’m your husband.”

    “You’re not anything….human.”

    Veteran director, Terence Fisher described this movie as the love story he had wanted to create. He ultimately succeeded… although of course it is a tragic one.  Ella is faithful to her husband’s memory for years, while his mind was imprisoned.  And when he finally can return, he can’t reach Ella.

    Give credit too, to a powerful script from Bert Batt, an assistant director who was never able to sell another screenplay.  And to Fisher, for a unique, powerful love story, taking place under bizarre circumstances.

    Peter Cushing as always, is excellent as the baron.  Maxine Audley is effective too, in the difficult role of Ella Brandt.  And Freddie Jones, so powerful as the cruel carnival owner in The Elephant Man, has probably never been better as the tormented
    Brandt/Richter.

  • HORRROR OF DRACULA

         Horror of Dracula was an eye-opener when it was first released (in 1957).  In his great book of short reviewsThe Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film, Michael Weldon calls it “The best vampire film ever made.”  I think he’s absolutely right.

         Its studio, Hammer, had a small budget to work with.   Much less freedom to use special effects likethose, for example in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, years later.  Hammer had to leave out several parts of the novel requiring special effects.

       Still the stripped-down plot taken from Bram Stoker’s great 1897 novel is focused and absorbing; scenes and images will stay with you.  Screenwriter Jimmy Sangster and director Terence Fisher got what they wanted.

      They believed that, to tell the story right, their movie needed two elements.   First, to spill blood like never before.   Second, the freedom to show women lusting for Count Dracula.  It meant pushing the censors (even stricter in the United Kingdom than in the USA) to new limits.  Remember, 1957 was still the era of Doris Day/Rock Hudson comedies.

       Horror of Dracula did not share much with the 1931 Universal Studios Dracula.But surprisingly, this was a good thing.   Most of that movie had been based on a Broadway play; the longer it goes on, the more stage-y it feels. The new Count Dracula, Christopher Lee,had never seen the Universal movie.   Instead, he reread the novel–many times, for his inspiration.

    image

    Christopher Lee–Dracula

       The opening scenes succeed in translating much of the
    book’s atmosphere.  The count is polite and speaks good
    English.   You don’t immediately feel anything sinister about him.  But all this is just a mask; you learn real fast that things are wrong here.

       Jonathan Harker has come to Castle Dracula in the disguise of librarian, his real mission to destroy Dracula. The count gives Harker a brief, but warm welcome.  He says little except for his compliments while he looks at photos of Harker’s beautiful fiancée Lucy.

       But you learn how false this mask is.  That night Harker walks downstairs and meets a woman begging him forhelp.  She tells him that Dracula is keeping her prisoner.

       Harker is unsure whether to believe her.  But when he later wanders downstairs, he accepts her word for everything.  Again the same embrace but this time with a savage difference; she turns her mouth to his neck and bares her teeth to bite him.

       What follows is probably the most intense scene in director Fisher’s career.  You see Dracula at the top of the staircase, face in close-up, eyes bright red.  In an instant he is down the stairs, throwing the woman to the floor.  She hisses back at him in pure fury.

    .image

    The savagery behind the polite shell

    .

    The two of them literally snarl at one another, hungry cats fighting over a scrap of food.

        Or maybe; two junkies fighting over just enough dope to get one of them off.  You feel a sense of viciousness, rarely experienced onscreen 70 years ago.  It shows another side of Dracula, one that stays with you.  A truth about him that makes Lucy and Mina’s craving for him more unsettling.    You have already seen his animal side.

    image

    Harker abruptly realizes what he is dealing with 

    Harker is soon dead, a victim of his own bad judgment in trying to
    stake Dracula. But Harker’s work is taken up by a new vampire
    hunter—Dr. Van Helsing.  An insightful, intelligent, imaginative, articulate, courageous man.  Someone who’s able to deal with vampires, but with others too:  Superstitious peasants in Transylvania, terrified of strangers.  Members of the Victorian-era middle class with just enough scientific knowledge to reject anything they believe is superstition. (The movie is set in Germany but its characters seem much more English than German.)

       Worst, a middle class that puts down its women, ignoring both their intellect and their sexuality.  The men, mostly pompous, self-satisfied, know-it-alls.   The women’s lives empty and boring.  It’s no great surprise these women are ready to follow a figure as charismatic as Dracula.

        Van Helsing knows all this and knows he must deal with these things alone.

       As he moves from each closed world to another, Van Helsing must deal with the peasants’ mistrust, and the  Holmwoods’ (Jonathan’s close friends) lack of belief. His job is especially difficult with this family.  Van Helsing needs to respectfully, yet forcefully convince them their rational, scientific outlook is accurate… but limited. Vampires still exist, and modern science is helpless against them.

       Most of all Van Helsing understands vampires; their craving for blood, a craving that inevitably strips away all humanity.  A craving more potent than friendship, love, even the taboos against harming a child.  He knows what Harker did not; how to use the weapons he has.image

    Dr. Van Helsing–great personal courage 

         When the scene shifts from Transylvania to middle-class Germany, Van Helsing has the difficult job of telling Harker’s friends that Jonathan is dead.    With great tact, Van Helsing wins over Mr. Holmwood.

        At this same moment, Van Helsing faces a new crisis.  Lucy, Harker’s fiancée, has been suffering anemia without explanation.  Lucy is a kindhearted but naive woman, over-protected all her life.  Her future already determined: wife and mother in the privileged class.

       Slowly but surely you sense a change in Lucy. As much as any British movie at that time could show, you feel her yearning, then lusting, for an unknown force to possess her. Watch her reaction to the garlic placed at her window for protection (no, it’s not the smell that makes her uneasy.) Watch her lie down in bed and open her nightgown to expose her throat.   Then watch her look of quiet
    expectation as the wind swirls the leaves outside her window.

    image

     Lucy waits for the Count; subtle images yet nearly censored in 1957

        She waits for someone, the opposite of the gracious but utterly bland Jonathan.  Someone with no hesitation about taking what he wants.   The count has left his castle and descended upon a  society with no defense against him.  Gasoline and matches.

       Lucy dies from loss of blood.  She is buried, yet Tania, a servant’s young child, has seen her at night, in the garden.  Van Helsing knows what must be done.

        Already, Lucy has asked Tania to go walking with her.  Without showing any violence, the movie makes it clear; though Lucy has known Tania for years, the girl is nothing to her now.  Only an easy  blood-meal.  You are light-years away here from the little girl in
    Interview with the Vampire.

       Van Helsing, not a pious man, is described by critics as a man with an intimate knowledge of sacred objects as weapons
    in his arsenal.  He uses a cross to stop Lucy in her tracks
    by placing it against her forehead, burning her deeply.  She
    flees back to her crypt.  Tania watches, one small step from
    hysteria.  Her plea, “I want to go home,” only hints at how
    close she is to chaos.

      But Van Helsing stays in control.  “And so you shall,” he tells her, his words symbolizing the calm presence he brings.  Very quietly, very assuredly he asks Tania to wait for him.

       Van Helsing must convince Holmwood that their only way to save Lucy’s soul is to drive a stake through her heart.  (In the novel, they must also cut her head off.)

        Blood gushes, but Van Helsing finishes his work.  Afterwards, his wisdom is clearly shown by the transformed expression on Lucy’s face, the sweetness, the innocence of the old Lucy.

         The violence that Fisher believed he needed to show is essential.  Lucy’s demonic urges must be purged from her to restore her to purity.  To understand, to taste for yourself the transformation from Lucy to vampire, then back to Lucy, you need to see the cancer cut out of her.

         Critics at the time, especially in England, criticized Fisher’s onscreen violence.  He believed that storytellers of magical tales needed to portray the struggle between good and evil graphically.  Suggestion was not enough.  His goal was not the ambiguity Val
    Lewton aimed for, and achieved so well, in Cat People and
    The Seventh Victim.  Instead Fisher strived for something closer to the horror of Germanic folk tales and legends.  The ones before well-meaning people created tamer versions, believing these tales must be made suitable for children.

        Sadly, time and budget limits meant that many of the novel’s characters had to be minimized or left out completely.  Stoker’s theme of a group of brothers and a sister united by common blood against a sinister foe is gone.  Van Helsing must face Dracula alone.

          In every way, he is up to the task. Horror of Dracula becomes a pure action movie after the count begins his flight back to the castle and Transylvania.  And it may be Hammer’s best action movie ever.  A fight to the death between two figures, both larger
    than life.  Peter Cushing, with a style of acting once described as “fussy” proves himself not just scholarly, but tough.

       Hammer’s peak years lasted until about 1962. The studio never could top what they achieved in this movie. Only one vampire movie The Brides of Dracula, even comes close, along with a scattering of others.  Hammer tried to ride the wave of freedom to show more sex, nudity, and violence in the late 60’s but it was too late.  Horror of Dracula remains their best, the real deal, especially when you imagine how it must have felt to people accustomed to Rock Hudson/Doris Day.  Don’t miss this one.

  • THE BRIDES OF DRACULA

          After the great success of. Horror of Dracula, Hammer studios wanted badly to make a sequel.

         However, Christopher Lee, so effective as the count in Horror, refused to star.  Lee was afraid of being typecast forever as Dracula.

       Hammer’s answer was to use a misleading title and then state in a prologue that Dracula is dead, but his many disciples live on.  Brides of Dracula is the story of one disciple, Baron Meinster.   You get a sense throughout this movie that Hammer did not want to change a successful formula.  They used the same director,
    Terence Fisher, writer Jimmy Sangster (along with two other
    screenwriters) and the other star of Horror, Peter Cushing, again playing  Dr. Van Helsing.

       What they got was the same intensity, possibly more.  The music tended to be melodramatic, over-the-top at times.  But it adds to the atmosphere.  And you feel a sizzling tension between the vampire, Baron Meinster, and his mother, who has kept him prisoner for years.

    In Brides, you feel right away that the countryside is a dangerous place, especially after sunset. Everywhere is mist, but it has a foul appearance to it, especially where it hangs over ponds and swamps. (In Horror of Dracula, Jonathan Harker notices the silence surrounding Dracula’s castle:  No birds sang.)

       Even at the inn, the atmosphere is tense.  The student-teacher, Marianne feels like an outsider the minute she enters.

       As thunder crashes, the tension increases with the
    arrival of a strange, severe-looking, aristocratic old woman
    dressed all in red and black.  She speaks one word to the old
    couple, “Wine.”  She is the Baroness Meinster, and immediately invites Marianne to share a drink, then to spend the night in her castle.  The landlord and his wife are clearly shaken and abruptly offer Marianne the chance to stay at the inn.  But Marianne has already accepted the baroness’ hospitality.

       You first see the castle in a low-angle shot, showing
    it perched on a mountainsideInside, it is exquisitely decorated, suggesting a great family. fortune.  Yet somehow Marianne still appears to be in danger.  Greta, the baroness’ one servant, gives off suspicious, controlling vibes; you get the impression that
    she will bully anyone who lets her.  For a moment, Marianne
    steps onto her balcony.  From there she can see a man standing outside in another wing of the castle.

       Instead of denying what Marianne saw, or trying to avoid it, the baroness speaks freely about the man, her son.  “My son is ill,” she says.   When Mariann asks if he is ill in his mind, the baroness does not deny it.  She says that he has caused her endless pain.  Once the castle was a place of grand parties and gatherings, but those days are long-gone, because of her son.  You canl hear a mix of great sadness, regret, and bitterness in her words.  She has not seen him or spoken to him in years, she says; he is fully in Greta’s care.

       Marianne goes to sleep then wakes suddenly, her mind on the man she glimpsed before.  She finds her way to his room.  For a long time he does not step out of the shadows.  He asks Marianne to come closer, explaining that he cannot come to her.  It is then that Marianne sees he is held prisoner by a long silver chain.

       The baron says that his mother has kept him chained
    and told people that he is dead; that she is motivated to
    keep the fortune, land, and castle that would be his inheritance.  As Marianne does, you wonder now if the baroness is the insane one, the monster.  Marianne agrees to find the key to the chain.  As Marianne walks from the baroness’ room back to the baron, his mother seems to stalk Marianne, the lighting on the baroness’ face making her look truly evil.  But Marianne is able to throw the baron the key.

       As Marianne finds the baron, his mother condemns her, “You little fool, you don’t know what you’ve done.”

      The baron speaks with quiet assurance, “She can’t harm you
    now.”  Then,” Mother, come here.  Now mother, come along with me.”

       Like Marianne, you can only guess what happens next.   But you get a clear enough idea when Marianne speaks to Greta, now hysterical.  Greta tells her that the countess is dead. “He’s free, the cunning devil… She’s dead and he’s free.”

    image

    Baron Meinster (David Peel)  

    Marianne leaves. Greta, still hysterical, speaks a long while to
    the dead baroness.  She is able to sum up her twenty years with the family into a few minutes of monologue.

       Keep in mind this movie was made in 1960, with many limitations in effect on what movies could not show, not mention, only hint at.  I think any aspiring screenwriter could do a lot worse than to listen to Greta’s words, for the way they hint at family dysfunction, with so many suggestions, implications, so much between the
    lines.  “Twenty years…You encouraged him.  You drank with him and his friends, laughed at their wicked games…brought women to him…”

        Critics have read many suggestions in these words:  Bisexuality, procuring victims after the baron became a vampire, just for starters.  But the more subtle suggestion: an incestuous relationship between mother and son (in all senses of the word).  Whatever the relationship was like once, it degenerated into hatred and a vicious struggle for power, stalemated for years until Marianne’s arrival.  The contempt the Baron feels for his mother is
    obvious in his voice.  Their years of separation have only made the situation uglier.

       Next morning, Marianne is found unconscious on the road by Dr. Van Helsing.  The story now takes a new turn: Van Helsing matching wits with Baron Meinster.  As in Horror of Dracula, Van Helsing is a man of great courage, knowledge, and dedication.  In absolute contrast, Baron Meinster is ruled by his passions.

       But you soon learn that he has an ally; Greta’s devotion to the Meinster’s is unchanged, even after the baron has turned his own mother into a vampire.

      After the baron kills a woman from the village, she is buried in the churchyard.  In a truly chilling scene, the undead woman struggles to get out of her coffin and through the soil above it.  Greta stands above her, and like a sinister midwife, urges her to push herself free.  Even Van Helsing’s eyes open wide.

       As in Horror, Van Helsing is dedicated (some would say, fanatically) to wiping out the plague of vampirism.  Though not a particularly pious man, he sees this struggle as one between absolute good and absolute evil.  He calls staking the dead village woman, “an act of healing.”  When he meets the baroness, now a vampire herself, she asks Van Helsing if he knows who she is. “I know who you were,” he tells her calmly.image

    Van Helsing–again, the only one to offer protection from
    the Undead

    She has become a tragic figure, telling Van Helsing she now must
    do all the wicked things her son tells her to do; there is no
    salvation for her.  Again, Van Helsing tells her salvation is still possible.

    image

    Marianne sees Meinster’s powers–former friend, now a
    vampire 

    In the end, Van Helsing must face the baron, along with Greta and
    two other vampires: the woman from the village, and Gina, another student-teacher at Marianne’s school.  Van Helsing
    shows true courage after Baron Meinster bites his neck, cauterizing the wound with a red-hot iron, then cooling it
    with Holy Water.

       At least one critic has called Brides of Dracula the best movie Hammer ever produced.  I wouldn’t quite go that far, but the
    direction, acting, and especially the screenwriting are all excellent.  As big a Hammer fan as I am, I seldom remember much of their dialogue.

         Here, there are some memorable lines.   Marianne says good night to the baroness, adding, “God bless you.”

        “If only He could,” the Baroness replies.

       David Peel, better known on-stage than in movies, is excellent in a demanding role, requiring (among other things): charm, vengefulness, pleading, gloating, bloodlust, pain, viciousness, even vulnerability.  Terence Fisher’s direction underlines Marianne’s struggle to find the truth behind the family’s masks.  Marianne is trusting, probably too much so, and her ability to judge from intuition is limited. Fisher shows you the anguish in her confused search to find the truth.

       It’s hard to believe now, but at the time, the director Fisher, and Hammer films were widely attacked forthe violence they showed onscreen, the sexual innuendo they hinted at.  Years later, Fisher, and screenwriter Jimmy Sangster’s work was put into clearer perspective, and many critics began to praise them.

        Both Sangster and Fisher wanted to show just how corrupt and foul vampirism was.  Here, the evils of vampirism are often overshadowed by the festering illness of the the Meinster family.  In Brides, you get the feeling this illness must be disinfected, or cut out like a cancer.

    . image

                                       Baron Meinster’s disciples   

    Fisher made a point of showing what that surgery was like, without much subtlety.  He believed that suggestion cannot show this visceral ripping, this tearing out.  Long before TV had er, Fisher and Sangster showed you the operating room, up close and personal.  Ultimately this is what Van Helsing meant when he tells the dead girl’s ( bitten by the Baron) father that unearthing her body and staking her will be “an act of healing.”

  • THE REVENGE OF FRANKENSTEIN

         The Revenge of Frankenstein was the second of seven movies that Hammer Studios produced featuring Baron Frankenstein and his many creations.  Six of them starred the remarkable Peter Cushing as the baron.  The baron turned out to be one of the most memorable characters not only in Hammer history but in movie history.  Revenge shows you many of his multiple facets, his contradictions as a human.

       The Curse of Frankenstein, the first of the series, was a major money-maker in Britain, the USA, and in several other countries.  The money it earned gave Hammer a great deal of freedom to explore their vision. This was especially true for one director, Terence Fisher, previously unknown except in Britain.

       In general, Curse got terrible reviews from movie critics, who were horrified, scornful, contemptuous.  Looking back, this is no big surprise. Horror movies, like rock and roll and comic books, were treated like an embarrassment by the mainstream; as if they
    deserved no place in culture.  Probably the most appropriate word for their status would be “marginalized.”

       Remember too, that in 1956 people were a lot more frightened by other things.  Atomic bombs had been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki just 11 years before.  Not only the USA but the Soviet Union too, now had nuclear capability.  Movies like The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms and Them!  had a strong emotional pull on
    audiences frightened about bombs being tested, possibly used in
    war.  A wave of “giant” movies followed: giant wasps, grasshoppers, a praying mantis, spiders, a scorpion, a Gila
    monster, even crabs and lots lots more.  Never had Frankenstein or Dracula seemed so irrelevant.

       But Hammer had the insight to realize that they had something worth sticking with, in the character of Baron Frankenstein.  His contradictions kept you from judging him guilty—just when you were sure he had committed the unforgivable, he had the capability to make you change your mind…or at least reserve your judgment.  You never doubted his superior intelligence or his skills as a doctor. Often you admired his lack of pretense, his no-bullshit
    attitude that few characters around him shared.

       Yet none of that could blind you to his arrogance, his self-centered motives.  He was more than willing to use people, then throw them away with no regret.  He viewed his personal success as more important than the lives of the unenlightened.  And for the baron, “the unenlightened “was a group that included practically everyone.

       The Curse of Frankenstein ends with the baron checkmated, condemned to death for the killing his monster did.  Revenge picks up the story soon afterward, with him awaiting execution.  But you notice a new character along with the priest and the executioner.  A man with a paralyzed, contorted arm and leg but something in his expression revealing native intelligence and calm under stress.  This is Karl, a man the Baron has gotten to know well in prison.  Karl’s eyes meet those of the executioner; you hear sounds of a struggle.  Soon afterward, you find the baron healthy and free.

       Months later, the baron, now calling himself Dr. Stein has re-invented himself, far better than anyone could have imagined.  Not only has he become the most respected (and best-paid) doctor in his town, he has established a clinic for the poor which allows him to cover a multitude of sins.  The charity work makes him a teflon man; it is impossible to criticize a humanitarian like Stein.  Other doctors in town are jealous of his money and reputation, but have no way to bring him down.

       The truth is far more ambiguous.  Though Dr. Stein is dedicated to his moneyless patients, these same patients serve as organ banks for the new creation he intends to show the world.  He dreams of the glory that awaits him for his achievement.  But he is obsessed too, with all who have condemned him in the past.  Almost as important as the admiration of fellow scientists is the fantasy of shoving his creation in the faces of everyone who have ever called him arrogant, crazy, or blasphemous.  “I will
    have my revenge,” he predicts.

       Karl has dreams too.  For long stretches of
    Revenge, they overshadow Dr. Stein’s plans and
    schemes.  Karl is someone you relate to—you feel for him
    a lot.

         Not that the idea of putting someone’s brain in a new body was anything original.  This theme was used several times in the Universal Frankenstein series of the 30’s and 40’s. But I cannot recall any scene from Universal with the power of this one in Revenge: the contorted Karl looks upward, longingly, at the body he dreams of inhabiting. It’s not a long scene, but you find it sticks in your consciousness.

     

    image

    The body Karl dreams of inhabiting

         Anyone who has ever felt a dislike or hatred about the way they look can understand what is in Karl’s heart.  You find this theme in
    The Glass Menagerie, Cyrano de Bergerac, Mask, the Ray Bradbury short story The Dwarf, even the Springsteen song Dancing in the Dark (“I wanna change my clothes, my hair, my face.”) and countless others.

       To Stein, his plan seems simple enough: remove Karl’s brain, place it into the new body he has constructed, wait for Karl to recover from surgery, and receive his due credit from the world’s scientific community.  But outside forces will take this quest in a different, horrible direction.  It is as if the world means to stop him cold.  As brilliant as Stein is, he is helpless to control all the variables in his complicated world.

       Margaret, a beautiful woman of much wealth, insists on volunteering at Stein’s clinic.  Stein, afraid of alienating her powerful father, allows her to do this, within his limits.

       But Margaret’s presence sets off a deadly chain-reaction.  A sneaky, manipulating servant at the clinic (Richard Wordsworth, so powerful in Curse of the Werewolf) tries to impress her.  He tells her Stein is doing surgery in secret on clinic patients, and shows Karl to her, in his new body.  To complicate things more:  Stein’s assistant, Dr. Kleve, talks to Karl about how famous he (Karl) will be as a result of Stein’s scientific triumph.

       Karl had met Margaret once before, in the days when he thought of himself a cripple and nothing more. Immediately he felt a strong infatuation.  Now, the chance he has for a real relationship blinds him to every other possibility.  He is genuinely afraid that Stein will use him, like a personal trophy, in the victory celebration for his
    achievements.  A basically shy man, Karl has no desire to show off his new body (“I’ve been stared at all my life.“)

     

    image

    Karl–His surgery goes according to plan–but complications he
    never planned on

         Without much advance warning, Stein finds everything he worked for slipping away.  You feel his disappointment, then your own guilt for feeling that disappointment.  But the real loser is Karl, who kept his end of the bargain (saving Frankenstein/Stein from the executioner) and finds that his new body fails him
    painfully.

     

    image

    The aristocrats’ world abruptly stunned; Karl’s plea for help
    exposes Frankenstein

         It’s not a surprise that the Baron’s failures make him more bitter as he ages.Frankenstein Must be Destroyed and
    Frankenstein and the Monster From Hell show him as meaner, less caring, even more of a user.  But part of us somehow continues to root for him.  At least one critic has written about the scene in Psycho where Norman waits desperately for Marian’s car to sink into the swamp.  Suddenly there we are, like Norman hoping that it sinks too.  At its best, Hammer’s Frankenstein series has a similar effect.

  • CURSE OF THE WEREWOLF

          How can our search for love, and a violent
    outcome, be chained together so intensely?  

         How many of us can remember and regret,
    hurtful things we’ve said to the person we love most?  

         Why do Frankenstein and
    Bride of Frankenstein move us, sometimes to
    tears?

         Probably because we feel two enormous forces
    at war inside ourselves: 

         First, our search for love; someone we can
    love, someone to love us.

         Second, our inner beast—trampling over our
    loved one, and over ourselves.

         At one time or another, how many of us have
    wished we could take out a knife and physically cut
    out the beast in ourselves?

         The credit sequence of
    Curse of the Werewolf achieves something rare,
    especially in 1960.   It shows you the
    beast—crying  actual tears.   He looks back on his life
    and realizes what might have been.  His story will
    spatter you, shower you with a mix of tears and blood.

         Curse is basically a story of
    good and evil.  Its director, Terence Fisher was not
    interested much in current psychology, for example: cycles of
    abuse, dysfunctional families,
    subconscious motivations.  (Although you can watch the
    movie on that level, and get plenty of insights.)

         Fisher wanted more to tell a story about an
    evil legacy; how so much evil can find its focus on one truly
    gentle man, Leon.

         To understand Leon’s heritage, you need to
    know the story of the Marquis’ wedding day.  A beggar
    (Richard Wordsworth) enters a small town and hears bells
    announcing a wedding.  But no one he meets feels any joy
    for the Marquis;  a cruel man who abuses his power.  For
    some reason the villagers tell the beggar to go to the
    Marquis’ castle if he is looking for food.

         When the beggar reaches the castle, the
    wedding feast is in full swing.  Right away the
    doorman warns him, “Go away before he sees you.”  He
    knows the Marquis; too much drinking is about to turn the
    celebration ugly.  

         The Marquis does his best to turn the beggar
    into a cruel joke, offering him to his bride as “her pet,”making
    him dance for food but giving him only wine first.   Then
    throwing food to him like a dog.

         As the Marquis and the bride get up to leave,
    the beggar offers the mildest of off-color remarks. 
    For this, the Marquis imprisons him in the castle dungeon.

         The narrator tells you the beggar was
    forgotten.   But “forgotten” only hints at what he suffered.
     He loses his freedom, and all that goes with it: 
    laughter, conversation, the chance of love, the sight of a
    beautiful sunset, a road to walk on.   Everything is lost to
    him but the smile of a little mute girl who feeds him scraps.

         Years pass.  The Marquis’ wife dies.
      The little girl grows into a beautiful
    woman.  The beggar is still forgotten.  The
    Marquis looks just like the monster he is inside. When he
    tries to drag the serving woman into his bed, she bites his
    hand.  The Marquis orders his men to throw her into
    the dungeon with the old beggar.

         The horror of his imprisonment has turned the
    beggar into a monster too.  All hefeels for the
    serving woman is lust.  He rapes her, but she stabs him
    to death the first chance she gets.   She is brought
    back to the Marquis who is sure she has learned her
    lesson.  He is wrong.  She stabs him to death too,
    then runs away.

         Sometime later, the serving woman (you never
    find out her name) is found, near death.  The man who
    saves her, Don Alfredo, and his servant, Teresa are clearly two
    compassionate people.  The nameless woman is pregnant
    and dies giving birth to a son, Leon.

        Even before Leon is born, you sense the battle
    beginning for his soul.  On one side his savage father,
    and the man who brought out the beast in him, the Marquis. 
    On the opposite side, Don Alfredo,Teresa, and the village priest.
     

         Teresa is afraid that Leon will be born on
    Christmas Day, a traditional omen of misfortune.  She
    hires a folk-healer who tries her best to prevent this.
      But she is unsuccessful.  The day Leon is baptized
    the sky suddenly turns dark, and the water in the font begins
    to boil.

        Leon grows into a goodhearted, sensitive boy. 
    He is too young to explain hiscomplicated, opposing impulses
    but they’re tragically clear.  Leon describes his only
    experience with hunting to Don Alfredo.  

        He shot a squirrel, and seeing it dead, tried to
    kiss it back to life.  But he tasted blood for the
    first time, and has loved the taste ever since.  When
    the moon turns full, goats outside the village begin to turn
    up dead, their throats ripped out.  Leon’s kitten dies the
    same way.  

       Don Alfredo and Teresa find a trail of evidence
    leading back to Leon.  They decide the only answer is to
    fit Leon’s windows with metal bars.  Their fears are correct,
    but the bars do the job.  The next scene is the most
    terrifying in the movie.  Leon, his face contorted
    with animal lust, grips the bars and struggles against them,
    shaking insanely. Justin Walters, the young
    actor playing Leon is superb here.  Terence Fisher’s
    direction is as usual, excellent.   But I don’t want to
    forget the script too.  Anthony Hinds was a high-level
    executive at Hammer Films during their most creative period.
      He wrote several fair-to-average screenplays and a few very
    good ones; probably he came up with his all-time best in
    Curse.

    More than 45 minutes pass before you meet the adult Leon (Oliver
    Reed), venturing out for the first time.  Don Alfredo
    and Teresa understood that they can only protect him for so
    long.  Leon has the same gentle, caring nature, but he’ll
    soon find that the outside world is not a safe place. 
    Most people he meets are not as evil as the Marquis or as kind as
    Don Alfredo.  But they are people trapped by tradition
    and class boundaries.   Closed-minded people, knowing only
    what they were brought up with. 

       The winery owner who hires Leon refuses to shake his
    hand; that is a privilege saved for fellow aristocrats. 
    All he cares about are his business, his finances, and a suitable
    match for his daughter, Christina.  Christina’s fiancé
    is a greedy man with no real feelings.  Only Christina has
    the heart and the insight to see what is inside Leon. 
    Soon, they are in love.

       A great deal has been written already about the way
    Fisher sees the world.  Fisher does not view it as
    an evil place.   Much of the time, people with true
    faith can overcome evil.  But the world can be uncaring,
    a constant struggle for someone like Leon.  To
    Christina’s father, Leon is just another peasant.  End
    of discussion.  

       Sadder still, Christina’s love is able to save Leon
    for a while.  With the moon full and the curse at
    work, Leon spends an entire night with his head in
    Christina’s lap, immune to the werewolf.  But
    stronger forces soon keep them apart.

       Many critics have pointed out how little time the
    werewolf is onscreen.  But what you do see is effective;
    Roy Ashton’s excellent make-up lets you see Leon’s agony and
    anger.  This is not a beast who takes pleasure in
    killing.  On the contrary, he is screaming in pain.  
           imageLeon–beginning to transform

    You don’t know the adult Leon in detail, but you do know he is the
    same good-hearted man he was a child.  He desperately
    wants to do the right thing. 

        Work hard, learn a trade, save his money, read all
    he can. Most of all, marry Christina.  The thought of
    spending his life chained up in a monastery makes
    himfurious.  Christina’s love is his only path to
    salvation and he knows it.  When he realizes her father means
    to keep them apart, Leon wants only death.

        It is the characters and their struggle against fate
    that make this movie so powerful. 

        You will most likely remember Leon’s pain and
    yearning more vividly than the killing he does.  Oliver
    Reed (Women in Love, The Devils, The Brood, Gladiator) is powerful as the adult Leon.  Anthony Dawson as the
    degenerate Marquis is also excellent.  His scenes as an old
    man are some of the scariest in the movie.imageThe beast–screaming in pain