Category: Hammer / Classic English

  • FRANKENSTEIN MUST BE DESTROYED

        Frankenstein Must be Destroyed was
    the next-to-last appearance of Peter Cushing as
    Baron Frankenstein.  This movie does have its faults.
      Probably the most serious; you have virtually no reason
    to sympathize with the baron anymore.  He is almost
    overwhelmingly evil.

        But after an undistinguished first half, things
    change radically.  The movie takes a devastating detour,
    turning into a bizarre, tragic love story, as powerful as it is
    unexpected.  You suddenly find yourself in a different
    tale.  Not the baron’s anymore, but that of Dr. Brandt and
    his wife Ella. 

        Imagine being light-years away from the person you
    loved most.  Then years later, you are back in the same
    house, close enough to watch them sleep.  Yet you know this
    is as close to them as you can ever get. 

        Many reasons for this.  But the strongest
    one: you really aren’t you anymore.  It is a
    startling idea, especially in a movie made in the late
    ‘60’s. 

        Much of the story up till then has gone in a
    different direction.  You watch the baron, feeling regret,
    but much more, feeling disgust.   His positive feelings
    have been bled out of him.  He does violence without
    regret. 

         As the movie opens, a well-dressed man walks
    down a street.  Suddenly another figure emerges from the
    shadows, a scythe in his hand.  In one stroke, he slices off
    the first man’s head, and calmly places it into a box he
    brought for this purpose.  This is your re- introduction to
    the new, savagely embittered Baron  Frankenstein.

        How has he become so cruel, so lacking in
    feeling?  Without excusing him, the movie gives you
    an explanation.   

      The baron sees himself as a man of vision, someone able to
    see past the limits of the scientific establishment. 
    For years, he has waited, relishing his opportunity to show them
    his greatness and their small-mindedness. 

         But despite his brilliance and imagination, he
    has seen frustration after frustration.  Is it God, or
    fate, or luck, or karma or Murphy’s Law?  The baron, a
    materialist through and through, is only sure it is
    not God… because God does not exist.   He is
    only sure of his ever-growing fury and ruthlessness,
    as though he is at war with the Universe.

          Baron Frankenstein tries to start fresh in a
    new town with a new identity, Mr. Fenner.  (He
    is careful not to call himself “Doctor.”)     In no
    time, his beautiful landlady, Anna, and her fiancé, Dr. Karl
    Holst, have become his blackmail victims.  (Anna’s mother
    lives in an expensive hospice, and Karl has been stealing
    cocaine from the medical facility and selling it, to pay for her
    stay.)

           The Baron does not need their help for
    a new creation.  He has something more urgent in mind. 
    It turns out that the Baron’s former research colleague, Dr.
    Brandt is an inmate at the hospital for the insane where Karl
    works.

        It is Dr. Brandt’s help that the Baron needs. 
    Brandt has made progress where the Baron was unsuccessful.
      Baron Frankenstein is obsessed with finding out Brandt’s
    discoveries.

        However the medical staff is sure that Brandt is
    unreachable.  His devoted wife Ella continues to
    visit him, never giving up hope that he will recover.  
    He shows no response to her.  To the doctors,
    he alternates between long stretches of total apathy and
    short bursts of  violence.

       Yet the baron believes he can cure Brandt’s
    insanity.  He can see only one way to solve this problem.
    Brandt must literally be kidnapped out of the
    hospital.    With Karl’s help the baron is able
    to do this.  Amazingly, he is also able to cure Brandt’s
    insanity through surgery.  imageThe surgery transferring Brandt’s brain turns out to be the
    easy part 

        But fate continues to plague Baron
    Frankenstein.  In getting free, Brandt has suffered a heart
    attack.  The baron knows Brandt has only days to live. 
    Frankenstein’s solution is grim but simple; he kills
    a respected surgeon, Dr. Richter, and places Brandt’s brain
    in Richter’s body.

       Again his gift for surgery serves the baron
    well.  And again fate betrays him; Brandt’s wife
    sees Frankenstein on the street, and believing she recognizes
    him, follows him home.

        The baron greets her warmly, and deceives her with a
    brilliant mix of truth, lies, and omissions.  He admits
    he is Frankenstein, and explains that kidnapping her husband was
    necessary to restore his sanity.  Then he tells her she
    may see her husband, though she may have trouble
    recognizing him, covered with bandages.  Doing this
    allows him not to tell her that her husband’s brain is
    now in Richter’s body.

         Unable to speak yet, Brandt is able to
    communicate with hand movements.  In addition,
    he recognizes his wife’s voice and can tell her this. 
    The baron’s plan is working to perfection.  He convinces
    Mrs. Brandt that her husband needs rest.   But she is welcome
    anytime to see him.  The minute she is gone, he turns to
    Karl and says, “Pack.  We’re leaving.”

        Frankenstein, Karl, Anna and Dr. Brandt (in Dr.
    Richter’s body) find refuge in a deserted estate.  In
    the next few minutes you start to realize: this is not
    Frankenstein’s story anymore.  It is Brandt’s story
    now; his desperate try at returning home, in every sense of
    the word.  

       Perhaps Brandt realizes right away that he and his
    wife can never regain what they have lost. 
    He has access to all his former consciousness, but the wrong
    body; the old one is dead.  His wife will only see him
    as another face, hear him as another voice.  

        And if she could ever accept him this way,
    it is too late now.   She has been shocked, traumatized
    too many times.  Already she has lived through his
    plunge into insanity, followed by years in the
    hospital. Years he was unable to even give her a smile of
    recognition.  The kidnapping.  Her joy at the
    baron telling her, her husband has returned and is sane
    now.  Then both her husband and the baron disappearing.

         And the final stab, the police showing her,
    her dead husband’s body.

        A brilliant, resourceful man, Brandt must realize
    too that Baron Frankenstein will never leave them in peace
    again.   The baron is a force of nature, dead set on finding
    out Brandt’s conclusions.  At the risk of stretching
    things a little, Frankenstein reminds me of Hannibal Lecter—he
    never stops coming at you.

        Brandt escapes from the baron and heads straight
    home.  Already he can sense just how poor the odds are
    that he and his wife can start a second life together.  Life
    has hurt her too much for her to accept him.  Second,
    Frankenstein will stop at nothing to get to his (Brandt’s)
    research conclusions. The baron would even kill Ella; her
    life means nothing to him.

       Brandt gets home.  He knows how much he needs to
    do before Frankenstein gets there.  Time is precious
    beyond belief.  He yearns to speak to Ella after so long.
      Yet he realizes full well how difficult it will be; to
    explain all that’s happened.  The music is poignant as he
    stands there a moment, watching her as she sleeps, but afraid
    to wake her.

       The best he can do is leave her a note, hope she
    reads it next morning, and speak to her then.

         Next day he is there when she wakes. 
    Ella reacts with even more pain than Brandt expected. 
    Perhaps he never realized that after his disappearance, his
    wife was told he was dead.

        He can only try to explain (in another man’s voice)
    all that has taken place.  He quickly realizes that she
    cannot take all this in.  Life has already dealt her one too
    many grim surprises.

        He speaks to her from behind a screen, afraid
    of the added shock of her seeing him.  When Ella finally
    does,  she faints.  She regains consciousness but the
    couple is past the point of ever communicating:

        “Don’t touch me.”

        “I wouldn’t harm you, Ella.  I’m your husband.”

        “You’re not anything….human.”

        Veteran director, Terence Fisher described this
    movie as the love story he had wanted to create. 
    He ultimately succeeded… although of course it is a tragic
    one.  Ella is faithful to her husband’s memory for
    years, while his mind was imprisoned.  And when he finally
    can return, he can’t reach Ella.  

         Give credit too, to a powerful script from
    Bert Batt, an assistant director who was never able to
    sell another screenplay.  And to Fisher, for a unique,
    powerful love story, taking place under
    bizarre circumstances.

        Peter Cushing as always, is excellent as the
    baron.  Maxine Audley is effective too, in the difficult
    role of Ella Brandt.  And Freddie Jones, so powerful as
    the cruel carnival owner in The Elephant Man,
    has probably never been better as the tormented
    Brandt/Richter.     

  • HORRROR OF DRACULA

         Horror of Dracula was an eye-opener when it was first released (in 1957).  In his great book of short reviewsThe Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film, Michael Weldon calls it “The best vampire film ever made.”  I think he’s absolutely right.

         Its studio, Hammer, had a small budget to work with.   Much less freedom to use special effects likethose, for example in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, years later.  Hammer had to leave out several parts of the novel requiring special effects.

       Still the stripped-down plot taken from Bram Stoker’sgreat 1897 novel is focused and absorbing; scenes and images will
    stay with you.  Screenwriter Jimmy Sangster and director
    Terence Fisher got what they wanted.

      They believed that, to tell the story right, their
    movie needed two elements.   First, to spill blood like
    never before.   Second, the freedom to show women
    lusting for Count Dracula.  It meant pushing the censors
    (even stricter in the United Kingdom than in the USA) to new
    limits.  Remember, 1957 was still the era of Doris Day/Rock
    Hudson comedies.

       Horror of Dracula did not share much with the 1931 Universal Studios Dracula.But surprisingly, this was a good thing.   Most of that movie had been based on a Broadway play; the longer it goes on, the more stage-y it feels. The new Count Dracula, Christopher Lee,had never seen the Universal movie.   Instead, he reread
    the novel many times for his inspiration.

    image

    Christopher Lee–Dracula

       The opening scenes succeed in translating much of the
    book’s atmosphere.  The count is polite and speaks good
    English.   You don’t immediately feel anything sinister
    about him.  But all this is just a mask; you learn real fast
    that things are wrong here.

       Jonathan Harker has come to Castle Dracula in the
    disguise of librarian, his real mission to destroy Dracula.
    The count gives Harker a brief, but warm welcome.  He says
    little except for his compliments while he looks at photos of
    Harker’s beautiful fiancée Lucy.

       But you learn how false this mask is.  That night Harker walks downstairs and meets a woman begging him forhelp.  She tells him that Dracula is keeping her prisoner.

       Harker is unsure whether to believe her.  But when he later wanders downstairs, he accepts her word for everything.  Again the same embrace but this time with a savage difference; she turns her mouth to his neck and bares herteeth to bite him.

       What follows is probably the most intense scene in
    director Fisher’s career.  You see Dracula at the top of the
    staircase, face in close-up, eyes bright red.  In an instant
    he is down the stairs, throwing the woman to the floor.  She
    hisses back at him in pure fury.image

    The savagery behind the polite shell  

         The two of them literally snarl at
    one another, hungry cats fighting over a scrap of food.

        Or maybe; two junkies fighting over just enough
    dope to get one of them off.  You feel a sense of
    viciousness, rarely experienced onscreen 50 years ago.  It
    shows another side of Dracula, one that stays with you.  A
    truth about him that makes Lucy and Mina’s craving for him more
    unsettling.    You have already seen his
    animal side.

    image

    Harker abruptly realizes what he is dealing
    with 

    Harker is soon dead, a victim of his own bad judgment in trying to
    stake Dracula. But Harker’s work is taken up by a new vampire
    hunter—Dr. Van Helsing.  An insightful, intelligent,
    imaginative, articulate, courageous man.  Someone who’s able
    to deal with vampires, but with others too:  Superstitious
    peasants in Transylvania, terrified of strangers.  Members of
    the Victorian-era middle class with just enough scientific
    knowledge to reject anything they believe is superstition.
    (The movie is set in Germany but its characters seem much more
    English than German.)

       Worst, a middle class that puts down its women,
    ignoring both their intellect and their sexuality.  The men,
    mostly pompous, self-satisfied, know-it-alls.   The
    women’s lives empty and boring.  It’s no great surprise these
    women are ready to follow a figure as charismatic as Dracula.

        Van Helsing knows all this and knows he must
    deal with these things alone.

       As he moves from each closed world to another, Van
    Helsing must deal with the peasants’ mistrust, and the
    Holmwoods’(Jonathan’s close friends) lack of belief.
    His job is especially difficult with this family.  Van
    Helsing needs to respectfully, yet forcefully convince them their
    rational, scientific outlook is accurate… but limited.
    Vampires still exist, and modern science is helpless against them.

       Most of all Van Helsing understands vampires; their
    craving for blood, a craving that inevitably strips away all
    humanity.  A craving more potent than friendship, love, even
    the taboos against harming a child.  He knows what Harker did
    not; how to use the weapons he has.image

    Dr. Van Helsing–great personal courage 

         When the scene shifts from Transylvania to
    middle-class Germany, Van Helsing has the difficult job of telling
    Harker’s friends that Jonathan is dead.    With
    great tact, Van Helsing wins over Mr. Holmwood.

        At this same moment, Van Helsing faces a new
    crisis.  Lucy, Harker’s fiancée, has been suffering anemia
    without explanation.  Lucy is a kindhearted but naive woman,
    over-protected all her life.  Her future already determined:
    wife and mother in the privileged class.

       Slowly but surely you sense a change in Lucy.
    As much as any British movie at that time could show, you feel her
    yearning, then lusting, for an unknown force to possess her.
    Watch her reaction to the garlic placed at her window for
    protection (no, it’s not the smell that makes her uneasy.)
    Watch her lie down in bed and open her nightgown to
    expose her throat.   Then watch her look of quiet
    expectation as the wind swirls the leaves outside her
    window. image

     Lucy waits for the Count; subtle images yet nearly censored in 1957

        She waits for someone, the opposite of the gracious
    but utterly bland Jonathan.  Someone with no hesitation about
    taking what he wants.   The count has left his castle
    and descended upon a  society with no defense against
    him.  Gasoline and matches.

       Lucy dies from loss of blood.  She is buried,
    yet Tania, a servant’s young child, has seen her at night, in the
    garden.  Van Helsing knows what must be done.

        Already, Lucy has asked Tania to go walking
    with her.  Without showing any violence, the movie makes it
    clear; though Lucy has known Tania for years, the girl is nothing
    to her now.  Only an easy  blood-meal.  You are
    light-years away here from the little girl in
    Interview with the Vampire.

       Van Helsing, not a pious man, is described by critics
    as a man with an intimate knowledge of sacred objects as weapons
    in his arsenal.  He uses a cross to stop Lucy in her tracks
    by placing it against her forehead, burning her deeply.  She
    flees back to her crypt.  Tania watches, one small step from
    hysteria.  Her plea, “I want to go home,” only hints at how
    close she is to chaos.

      But Van Helsing stays in control.  “And so you shall,”
    he tells her, his words symbolizing the calm presence he
    brings.  Very quietly, very assuredly he asks Tania to wait
    for him.

       Van Helsing must convince Holmwood that their only
    way to save Lucy’s soul is to drive a stake through her
    heart.  (In the novel, they must also cut her head off.)

        Blood gushes, but Van Helsing finishes his
    work.  Afterwards, his wisdom is clearly shown by the
    transformed expression on Lucy’s face, the sweetness, the
    innocence of the old Lucy.

         The violence that Fisher believed he
    needed to show is essential.  Lucy’s demonic urges must be
    purged from her to restore her to purity.  To
    understand, to taste for yourself the transformation from
    Lucy to vampire, then back to Lucy, you need to see the
    cancer cut out of her.

         Critics at the time, especially in
    England, criticized Fisher’s onscreen violence.  He believed
    that storytellers of magical tales needed to portray the struggle
    between good and evil graphically.  Suggestion was not
    enough.  His goal was not the ambiguity Val
    Lewton aimed for, and achieved so well, in
    Cat People and
    The Seventh Victim.  Instead Fisher strived
    for something closer to the horror of Germanic folk tales and
    legends.  The ones before well-meaning people created tamer
    versions, believing these tales must be made suitable for
    children.

        Sadly, time and budget limits meant that many
    of the novel’s characters had to be minimized or left out
    completely.  Stoker’s theme of a group of brothers and a
    sister united by common blood against a sinister foe is
    gone.  Van Helsing must face Dracula alone.

       In every way, he is up to the task.
    Horror of Dracula becomes a pure action movie
    after the count begins his flight back to the castle and
    Transylvania.  And it may be Hammer’s best action movie
    ever.  A fight to the death between two figures, both larger
    than life.  Peter Cushing, with a style of acting once
    described as “fussy” proves himself not just scholarly, but
    tough.

       Hammer’s peak years lasted until about 1962.
    The studio never could top what they achieved in this movie.
    Only one vampire movie The Brides of Dracula,
    even comes close, along with a scattering of others.  Hammer
    tried to ride the wave of freedom to show more sex, nudity, and
    violence in the late 60’s but it was too late.  Horror of Dracula
    remains their best, the real deal, especially when you imagine how
    it must have felt to people accustomed to Rock Hudson/Doris
    Day.  Don’t miss this one.

  • THE BRIDES OF DRACULA

          After the great success of
    Horror of Dracula, Hammer studios wanted badly to
    make a sequel.

         However, Christopher Lee, so effective as the
    count in Horror, refused to star.  Lee was
    afraid of being typecast forever as Dracula.

       Hammer’s answer was to use a misleading title and
    then state in a prologue that Dracula is dead, but his many
    disciples live on.  Brides of Dracula is the
    story of one disciple, Baron Meinster.   You get a sense
    throughout this movie that Hammer did not want to change a
    successful formula.  They used the same director,
    Terence Fisher, writer Jimmy Sangster (along with two other
    screenwriters) and the other star of Horror,
    Peter Cushing, again playing  Dr. Van Helsing.

       What they got was the same intensity, possibly
    more.  The music tended to be melodramatic, over-the-top at
    times.  But it adds to the atmosphere.  And you feel a
    sizzling tension between the vampire, Baron Meinster, and his
    mother, who has kept him prisoner for years.

    In Brides, you feel right away that the
    countryside is a dangerous place, especially after sunset.

       Everywhere is mist, but it has a foul appearance to
    it, especially where it hangs over ponds and swamps.
     (In Horror of Dracula, Jonathan Harker
    notices the silence surrounding Dracula’s castle:  No
    birds sang.)

       Even at the inn, the atmosphere is tense.  The
    student-teacher, Marianne feels like an outsider the minute
    she enters.

       As thunder crashes, the tension increases with the
    arrival of a strange, severe-looking, aristocratic old woman
    dressed all in red and black.  She speaks one word to the old
    couple, “Wine.”  She is the Baroness Meinster, and
     immediately invites Marianne to share a drink, then to spend
    the night in her castle.  The landlord and his wife are
    clearly shaken and abruptly offer Marianne the chance to stay
    at the inn.  But Marianne has already accepted the baroness’
    hospitality.

       You first see the castle in a low-angle shot, showing
    it perched on a mountainsideInside, it
    is exquisitely decorated, suggesting a great family
    fortune.  Yet somehow Marianne still appears to be
    in danger.  Greta, the baroness’ one servant, gives off
    suspicious, controlling vibes; you get the impression that
    she will bully anyone who lets her.  For a moment, Marianne
    steps onto her balcony.  From there she can see a man
    standing outside in another wing of the castle.

       Instead of denying what Marianne saw, or trying to
    avoid it, the baroness speaks freely about the man, her
    son.  “My son is ill,” she says.   When Marianne
    asks if he is ill in his mind, the baroness does not deny
    it.  She says that he has caused her endless pain.  Once
    the castle was a place of grand parties and gatherings, but
    those days are long-gone, because of her son.  You can
    hear a mix of great sadness, regret, and bitterness in her
    words.  She has not seen him or spoken to him in years,
    she says; he is fully in Greta’s care.

       Marianne goes to sleep then wakes suddenly, her mind
    on the man she glimpsed before.  She finds her way to
    his room.  For a long time he does not step out of the
    shadows.  He asks Marianne to come closer, explaining
    that he cannot come to her.  It is then that Marianne sees he
    is held prisoner by a long silver chain.

       The baron says that his mother has kept him chained
    and told people that he is dead; that she is motivated to
    keep the fortune, land, and castle that would be his
    inheritance.  As Marianne does, you wonder now if the
    baroness is the insane one, the monster.  Marianne agrees to
    find the key to the chain.  As Marianne walks from the
    baroness’ room back to the baron, his mother seems to
    stalk Marianne, the lighting on the baroness’ face making her
    look truly evil.  But Marianne is able to throw the
    baron the key.

       As Marianne finds the baron, his mother condemns her,
    “You little fool, you don’t know what you’ve done.”

      The baron speaks with quiet assurance, “She can’t harm you
    now.”  Then,” Mother, come here.  Now mother, come
    along with me.”

       Like Marianne, you can only guess what happens
    next.   But you get a clear enough idea
      when Marianne speaks to Greta, now
    hysterical.  Greta tells her that the countess is dead.
    “He’s free, the cunning devil… She’s dead and he’s free.”image

    Baron Meinster (David Peel)  

    Marianne leaves. Greta, still hysterical, speaks a long while to
    the dead baroness.  She is able to sum up her twenty
    years with the family into a few minutes of monologue.

       Keep in mind this movie was made in 1960, with many
    limitations in effect on what movies could not show, not
    mention, only hint at.  I think any aspiring screenwriter
    could do a lot worse than to listen to Greta’s words, for the
    way they hint at family dysfunction, with so many
    suggestions, implications, so much between the
    lines.

       “Twenty years…You encouraged him.  You drank
    with him and his friends, laughed at their
    wicked games…brought women to him…”

        Critics have read many suggestions in these
    words:  Bisexuality, procuring victims after the
    baron became a vampire, just for starters.  But the more
    subtle suggestion: an incestuous relationship between mother
    and son (in all senses of the word).  Whatever the
    relationship was like once, it degenerated into hatred and a
    vicious struggle for power, stalemated for years until Marianne’s
    arrival.  The contempt the Baron feels for his mother is
    obvious in his voice.  Their years of separation have
    only made the situation uglier.

       Next morning, Marianne is found unconscious on the
    road by Dr. Van Helsing.  The story now takes a new
    turn: Van Helsing matching wits with Baron Meinster.  As in
    Horror of Dracula, Van Helsing is a man of
    great courage, knowledge, and dedication.  In absolute
    contrast, Baron Meinster is ruled by his passions.

       But you soon learn that he has an ally; Greta’s
    devotion to the Meinster’s is unchanged, even after the baron
    has turned his own mother into a vampire.

      After the baron kills a woman from the village, she is
    buried in the churchyard.  In a truly chilling scene,
    the undead woman struggles to get out of her coffin and through
    the soil above it.  Greta stands above her, and like a
    sinister midwife, urges her to push herself free.  Even Van
    Helsing’s eyes open wide.

       As in Horror, Van Helsing is
    dedicated (some would say, fanatically) to wiping out the plague
    of vampirism.  Though not a particularly pious man, he
    sees this struggle as one between absolute good and absolute
    evil.  He calls staking the dead village woman, “an act of
    healing.”  When he meets the baroness, now a vampire
    herself, she asks Van Helsing if he knows who she is. “I know who
    you were,” he tells her calmly.image

    Van Helsing–again, the only one to offer protection from
    the Undead

    She has become a tragic figure, telling Van Helsing she now must
    do all the wicked things her son tells her to do; there is no
    salvation for her.  Again, Van Helsing tells her salvation is
    still possible.image

    Marianne sees Meinster’s powers–former friend, now a
    vampire 

    In the end, Van Helsing must face the baron, along with Greta and
    two other vampires: the woman from the village, and Gina,
    another student-teacher at Marianne’s school.  Van Helsing
    shows true courage after Baron Meinster bites his neck,
    cauterizing the wound with a red-hot iron, then cooling it
    with Holy Water.

       At least one critic has called
    Brides of Dracula the best movie Hammer ever
    produced.  I couldn’t quite go that far, but the
    direction, acting, and especially the screenwriting are all
    excellent.  As big a Hammer fan as I am, I seldom
    remember much of their dialogue.

         Here, there are some memorable
    lines.   Marianne says good-night to the baroness,
    adding, “God bless you.”

        “If only He could,” the Baroness replies.

       David Peel, better known on-stage than in movies, is
    excellent in a demanding role, requiring (among other
    things): charm, vengefulness, pleading, gloating, bloodlust, pain,
    viciousness, even vulnerability.  Terence Fisher’s
    direction underlines Marianne’s struggle to find the truth behind
    the family’s masks.  Marianne is trusting, probably too much
    so, and her ability to judge from intuition is limited.
    Fisher shows you the anguish in her confused search to find the
    truth.

       It’s hard to believe now, but at the time, the
    director Fisher, and Hammer films were widely attacked for
    the violence they showed onscreen, the sexual innuendo they hinted
    at.  Years later, Fisher, and screenwriter Jimmy
    Sangster’s work was put into clearer perspective, and many critics
    began to praise them.

        Both Sangster and Fisher wanted to show just
    how corrupt and foul vampirism was.  Here, the evils
    of vampirism are often overshadowed by the festering illness
    of the the Meinster family.  In Brides,
    you get the feeling this illness must be disinfected, or cut out
    like a cancer. image

    Baron Meinster’s disciples   

    Fisher made a point of showing what that surgery was like, without
    much subtlety.  He believed that suggestion
    cannot show this visceral ripping, this tearing
    out.  Long before TV had ER, Fisher
    and Sangster showed you the operating room, up close and
    personal.  Ultimately this is what Van Helsing meant
    when he tells the dead girl’s ( bitten by the Baron) father that
    unearthing her body and staking her will be “an act of
    healing.”

  • THE REVENGE OF FRANKENSTEIN

         The Revenge of Frankenstein
    was the second of seven movies that Hammer Studios
    produced featuring Baron Frankenstein and his many
    creations.  Six of them starred the remarkable Peter Cushing
    as the baron.  The baron turned out to be one of the most
    memorable characters not only in Hammer history but in movie
    history.  Revenge shows you many of his
    multiple facets, his contradictions as a human.

       The Curse of Frankenstein, the first
    of the series, was a major money-maker in Britain, the USA, and
    in several other countries.  The money it earned gave
    Hammer a great deal of freedom to explore their vision. 
    This was especially true for one director, Terence Fisher,
    previously unknown except in Britain. 

       In general, Curse got terrible
    reviews from movie critics, who were horrified, scornful,
    contemptuous.  Looking back, this is no big surprise. 
    Horror movies, like rock and roll and comic books, were
    treated like an embarrassment by the mainstream; as if they
    deserved no place in culture.  Probably the
    most appropriate word for their status would be
    “marginalized.”

       Remember too, that in 1956 people were a lot more
    frightened by other things.  Atomic bombs had been
    dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki just 11 years before.  Not
    only the USA but the Soviet Union too, now had nuclear
    capability.  Movies like
    The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms and
    Them!  had a strong emotional pull on
    audiences frightened about bombs being tested, possibly used in
    war.  A wave of “giant” movies followed: giant wasps,
    grasshoppers, a praying mantis, spiders, a scorpion, a Gila
    monster, even crabs and lots lots more.  Never had
    Frankenstein or Dracula seemed so irrelevant.

       But Hammer had the insight to realize that they had
    something worth sticking with, in the character of Baron
    Frankenstein.  His contradictions kept you from judging him
    guilty—just when you were sure he had committed the
    unforgivable, he had the capability to make you change your
    mind…or at least reserve your judgment.  You never
    doubted his superior intelligence or his skills as a doctor. 
    Often you admired his lack of pretense, his no-bullshit
    attitude that few characters around him shared.

       Yet none of that could blind you to his arrogance,
    his self-centered motives.  He was more than willing to
    use people, then throw them away with no regret.  He viewed
    his personal success as more important than the lives of the
    unenlightened.  And for the baron, “the unenlightened “was
    a group that included practically everyone.

       The Curse of Frankenstein ends with
    the baron checkmated, condemned to death for the killing
    his monster did.  Revenge picks up the
    story soon afterward, with him awaiting execution.  But you
    notice a new character along with the priest and the
    executioner.  A man with a paralyzed, contorted arm
    and leg but something in his expression revealing native
    intelligence and calm under stress.  This is Karl, a man
    the Baron has gotten to know well in prison.  Karl’s eyes
    meet those of the executioner; you hear sounds of a
    struggle.  Soon afterward, you find the baron healthy and
    free.

       Months later, the baron, now calling himself Dr.
    Stein has re-invented himself, far better than anyone could
    have imagined.  Not only has he become the most respected
    (and best-paid) doctor in his town, he has established a
    clinic for the poor which allows him to cover a multitude of
    sins.  The charity work makes him a teflon man; it is
    impossible to criticize a humanitarian like Stein.  Other
    doctors in town are jealous of his money and reputation, but
    have no way to bring him down.

       The truth is far more ambiguous.  Though Dr.
    Stein is dedicated to his moneyless patients, these
    same patients serve as organ banks for the new creation he
    intends to show the world.  He dreams of the glory that
    awaits him for his achievement.  But he is obsessed too, with
    all who have condemned him in the past.  Almost as
    important as the admiration of fellow scientists is the fantasy of
    shoving his creation in the faces of everyone who have ever
    called him arrogant, crazy, or blasphemous.  “I will
    have my revenge,” he predicts.

       Karl has dreams too.  For long stretches of
    Revenge, they overshadow Dr. Stein’s plans and
    schemes.  Karl is someone you relate to—you feel for him
    a lot.

         Not that the idea of putting someone’s
    brain in a new body was anything original.  This theme
    was used several times in the Universal
    Frankenstein series of the 30’s and 40’s. 
    But I cannot recall any scene from Universal with the power
    of this one in Revenge: the contorted Karl looks
    upward, longingly, at the body he dreams of inhabiting. It’s
    not a long scene, but you find it sticks in your
    consciousness. 

    image

    The body Karl dreams of inhabiting

         Anyone who has ever felt a dislike or hatred
    about the way they look can understand what is in
    Karl’s heart.  You find this theme in
    The Glass Menagerie, Cyrano de Bergerac, Mask, the Ray Bradbury short story The Dwarf, even the Springsteen song
    Dancing in the Dark (“I wanna change my clothes,
    my hair, my face.”) and countless others.

       To Stein, his plan seems simple enough: remove Karl’s
    brain, place it into the new body he has constructed, wait
    for Karl to recover from surgery, and receive his due credit from
    the world’s scientific community.  But outside forces
    will take this quest in a different, horrible direction.  It
    is as if the world means to stop him cold.  As brilliant
    as Stein is, he is helpless to control all the variables
    in his complicated world.

       Margaret, a beautiful woman of much wealth, insists
    on volunteering at Stein’s clinic.  Stein, afraid
    of alienating her powerful father, allows her to do this,
    within his limits. 

       But Margaret’s presence sets off a deadly
    chain-reaction.  A sneaky, manipulating servant at the
    clinic (Richard Wordsworth, so powerful in
    Curse of the Werewolf) tries to impress
    her.  He tells her Stein is doing surgery in secret on
    clinic patients, and shows Karl to her, in his new body.  To
    complicate things more:  Stein’s assistant, Dr. Kleve,
    talks to Karl about how famous he (Karl) will be as a result of
    Stein’s scientific triumph.

       Karl had met Margaret once before, in the days when
    he thought of himself a cripple and nothing more. Immediately
    he felt a strong infatuation.  Now, the chance he has for a
    real relationship blinds him to every other
    possibility.  He is genuinely afraid that Stein will use him,
    like a personal trophy, in the victory celebration for his
    achievements.  A basically shy man, Karl has no desire to
    show off his new body (“I’ve been stared at all my
    life.“)

    image

    Karl–His surgery goes according to plan–but complications he
    never planned on

         Without much advance warning, Stein finds
    everything he worked for slipping away.  You feel
    his disappointment, then your own guilt for feeling that
    disappointment.  But the real loser is Karl, who
    kept his end of the bargain (saving Frankenstein/Stein from
    the executioner) and finds that his new body fails him
    painfully. 

    image

    The aristocrats’ world abruptly stunned; Karl’s plea for help
    exposes Frankenstein

       

         It’s not a surprise that the Baron’s failures
    make him more bitter as he ages. 
    Frankenstein Must be Destroyed and
    Frankenstein and the Monster From Hell show him
    as meaner, less caring, even more of a user.  But part of us
    somehow continues to root for him.  At least one critic has
    written about the scene in Psycho where
    Norman waits desperately for Marian’s car to sink into the
    swamp.  Suddenly there we are, like Norman hoping that
    it sinks too.  At its best, Hammer’s
    Frankenstein series has a similar effect.

  • CURSE OF THE WEREWOLF

          How can our search for love, and a violent
    outcome, be chained together so intensely?  

         How many of us can remember and regret,
    hurtful things we’ve said to the person we love most?  

         Why do Frankenstein and
    Bride of Frankenstein move us, sometimes to
    tears?

         Probably because we feel two enormous forces
    at war inside ourselves: 

         First, our search for love; someone we can
    love, someone to love us.

         Second, our inner beast—trampling over our
    loved one, and over ourselves.

         At one time or another, how many of us have
    wished we could take out a knife and physically cut
    out the beast in ourselves?

         The credit sequence of
    Curse of the Werewolf achieves something rare,
    especially in 1960.   It shows you the
    beast—crying  actual tears.   He looks back on his life
    and realizes what might have been.  His story will
    spatter you, shower you with a mix of tears and blood.

         Curse is basically a story of
    good and evil.  Its director, Terence Fisher was not
    interested much in current psychology, for example: cycles of
    abuse, dysfunctional families,
    subconscious motivations.  (Although you can watch the
    movie on that level, and get plenty of insights.)

         Fisher wanted more to tell a story about an
    evil legacy; how so much evil can find its focus on one truly
    gentle man, Leon.

         To understand Leon’s heritage, you need to
    know the story of the Marquis’ wedding day.  A beggar
    (Richard Wordsworth) enters a small town and hears bells
    announcing a wedding.  But no one he meets feels any joy
    for the Marquis;  a cruel man who abuses his power.  For
    some reason the villagers tell the beggar to go to the
    Marquis’ castle if he is looking for food.

         When the beggar reaches the castle, the
    wedding feast is in full swing.  Right away the
    doorman warns him, “Go away before he sees you.”  He
    knows the Marquis; too much drinking is about to turn the
    celebration ugly.  

         The Marquis does his best to turn the beggar
    into a cruel joke, offering him to his bride as “her pet,”making
    him dance for food but giving him only wine first.   Then
    throwing food to him like a dog.

         As the Marquis and the bride get up to leave,
    the beggar offers the mildest of off-color remarks. 
    For this, the Marquis imprisons him in the castle dungeon.

         The narrator tells you the beggar was
    forgotten.   But “forgotten” only hints at what he suffered.
     He loses his freedom, and all that goes with it: 
    laughter, conversation, the chance of love, the sight of a
    beautiful sunset, a road to walk on.   Everything is lost to
    him but the smile of a little mute girl who feeds him scraps.

         Years pass.  The Marquis’ wife dies.
      The little girl grows into a beautiful
    woman.  The beggar is still forgotten.  The
    Marquis looks just like the monster he is inside. When he
    tries to drag the serving woman into his bed, she bites his
    hand.  The Marquis orders his men to throw her into
    the dungeon with the old beggar.

         The horror of his imprisonment has turned the
    beggar into a monster too.  All hefeels for the
    serving woman is lust.  He rapes her, but she stabs him
    to death the first chance she gets.   She is brought
    back to the Marquis who is sure she has learned her
    lesson.  He is wrong.  She stabs him to death too,
    then runs away.

         Sometime later, the serving woman (you never
    find out her name) is found, near death.  The man who
    saves her, Don Alfredo, and his servant, Teresa are clearly two
    compassionate people.  The nameless woman is pregnant
    and dies giving birth to a son, Leon.

        Even before Leon is born, you sense the battle
    beginning for his soul.  On one side his savage father,
    and the man who brought out the beast in him, the Marquis. 
    On the opposite side, Don Alfredo,Teresa, and the village priest.
     

         Teresa is afraid that Leon will be born on
    Christmas Day, a traditional omen of misfortune.  She
    hires a folk-healer who tries her best to prevent this.
      But she is unsuccessful.  The day Leon is baptized
    the sky suddenly turns dark, and the water in the font begins
    to boil.

        Leon grows into a goodhearted, sensitive boy. 
    He is too young to explain hiscomplicated, opposing impulses
    but they’re tragically clear.  Leon describes his only
    experience with hunting to Don Alfredo.  

        He shot a squirrel, and seeing it dead, tried to
    kiss it back to life.  But he tasted blood for the
    first time, and has loved the taste ever since.  When
    the moon turns full, goats outside the village begin to turn
    up dead, their throats ripped out.  Leon’s kitten dies the
    same way.  

       Don Alfredo and Teresa find a trail of evidence
    leading back to Leon.  They decide the only answer is to
    fit Leon’s windows with metal bars.  Their fears are correct,
    but the bars do the job.  The next scene is the most
    terrifying in the movie.  Leon, his face contorted
    with animal lust, grips the bars and struggles against them,
    shaking insanely. Justin Walters, the young
    actor playing Leon is superb here.  Terence Fisher’s
    direction is as usual, excellent.   But I don’t want to
    forget the script too.  Anthony Hinds was a high-level
    executive at Hammer Films during their most creative period.
      He wrote several fair-to-average screenplays and a few very
    good ones; probably he came up with his all-time best in
    Curse.

    More than 45 minutes pass before you meet the adult Leon (Oliver
    Reed), venturing out for the first time.  Don Alfredo
    and Teresa understood that they can only protect him for so
    long.  Leon has the same gentle, caring nature, but he’ll
    soon find that the outside world is not a safe place. 
    Most people he meets are not as evil as the Marquis or as kind as
    Don Alfredo.  But they are people trapped by tradition
    and class boundaries.   Closed-minded people, knowing only
    what they were brought up with. 

       The winery owner who hires Leon refuses to shake his
    hand; that is a privilege saved for fellow aristocrats. 
    All he cares about are his business, his finances, and a suitable
    match for his daughter, Christina.  Christina’s fiancé
    is a greedy man with no real feelings.  Only Christina has
    the heart and the insight to see what is inside Leon. 
    Soon, they are in love.

       A great deal has been written already about the way
    Fisher sees the world.  Fisher does not view it as
    an evil place.   Much of the time, people with true
    faith can overcome evil.  But the world can be uncaring,
    a constant struggle for someone like Leon.  To
    Christina’s father, Leon is just another peasant.  End
    of discussion.  

       Sadder still, Christina’s love is able to save Leon
    for a while.  With the moon full and the curse at
    work, Leon spends an entire night with his head in
    Christina’s lap, immune to the werewolf.  But
    stronger forces soon keep them apart.

       Many critics have pointed out how little time the
    werewolf is onscreen.  But what you do see is effective;
    Roy Ashton’s excellent make-up lets you see Leon’s agony and
    anger.  This is not a beast who takes pleasure in
    killing.  On the contrary, he is screaming in pain.  
           imageLeon–beginning to transform

    You don’t know the adult Leon in detail, but you do know he is the
    same good-hearted man he was a child.  He desperately
    wants to do the right thing. 

        Work hard, learn a trade, save his money, read all
    he can. Most of all, marry Christina.  The thought of
    spending his life chained up in a monastery makes
    himfurious.  Christina’s love is his only path to
    salvation and he knows it.  When he realizes her father means
    to keep them apart, Leon wants only death.

        It is the characters and their struggle against fate
    that make this movie so powerful. 

        You will most likely remember Leon’s pain and
    yearning more vividly than the killing he does.  Oliver
    Reed (Women in Love, The Devils, The Brood, Gladiator) is powerful as the adult Leon.  Anthony Dawson as the
    degenerate Marquis is also excellent.  His scenes as an old
    man are some of the scariest in the movie.imageThe beast–screaming in pain